In 2017, UK Labour MP Naz Shah not only “liked,” but retweeted a tweet saying that girls who were victimized by Muslim rape gangs needed to “shut their mouths for the good of diversity.” Rather than face consequences, she was promoted the following year by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to “a frontbench role as Shadow Minister of State for Women and Equalities in his Shadow Cabinet.” Now his successor, Sir Keir Starmer, “has also shown favour to Shah, appointing her to the newly created post of Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion.”
It is ironic that Naz Shah is accepted as an outspoken “anti-hate” activist when she promotes it herself through her disdain for the young white British girls who were raped by Muslim gangs. Shah has accused her government of “failing to stand with minority communities” and of allowing “hatred and bigoted views to become legitimised.” Following the firestorm over her retweet in 2017, she deleted the retweet and “unliked” the post. But she escaped all accountability for her own actions.
Shah has been a key figure in trying to stifle reporting about the Muslim rape gang scandal. Equality and Human Rights Commission chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath stated rightly at the time of the retweet controversy that “We need to keep the victims of these horrific crimes at the heart of the debate and always remember that diversity is not served by silence.”
One would expect better from Labour MP Naz Shah, who suffered a traumatic childhood, including being victimized under oppressive Sharia norms. She was forced into an abusive marriage at the tender age of 15. But that does not matter to the Labour party, nor to the British media. All that matters is identity politics. The Guardian once asked this question about Shah, given her history: “Who, then, could be better qualified than Shah to talk about integration?” Yet Shah is actually highly unqualified to talk about integration, given her protection of Muslim rape gangs who view themselves as entitled to take infidel girls at will, in accordance with their supremacist Islamic beliefs.
Far too many hatemongers such as Naz Shah go from strength to strength via their manipulation of identity politics, and continue to impose their values upon Western societies, which tolerate them in the name of “diversity.”
“Labour’s New Leader Promotes MP Who Shared ‘Abused Girls Need to Shut Their Mouths for Good of Diversity’ Tweet,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, April 11, 2020:
The Labour Party’s new leader has appointed an MP who shared a tweet stating “Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity” as Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion.
Naseem ‘Naz’ Shah, the British-Pakistani Labour MP for Bradford West, sparked outrage when she shared the tweet — which she said was “a genuine accident”, although she also “liked” it — in 2017, with tens of thousands of people signing a petition demanding her resignation.
She did not resign — indeed, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn actually promoted her to a frontbench role as Shadow Minister of State for Women and Equalities in his Shadow Cabinet the following year.
Now Corbyn’s successor Sir Keir Starmer, the devoted anti-Brexiteer hailed by many left-liberals as a “moderate” who can drag Labour back to the so-called “centre ground” of British politics, has also shown favour to Shah, appointing her to the newly created post of Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion.
The decision to promote Shah to a “community cohesion” role may cause consternation among Britain’s Jewish community as well as the thousands of mostly white victims of mostly Muslim grooming gang rapists across the country, given she has also been embroiled in a number of anti-Semitism controversies.
Prior to becoming an MP, she had shared content on Facebook calling for the disestablishment of Israel and the physical “transportation” of Israeli Jews to the United States.
She also once urged her followers to vote in a poll on whether or not Israel was responsible for war crimes, warning them that “the Jews are rallying”.
More recently, Shah marked the death of Nelson Mandela’s widow Winnie Mandela by sharing a picture of her alongside one of her more infamous quotes: “Together, hand in hand, with our matches and our necklaces, we shall liberate this country.”….
Gork says
If this is real, we will all be able to point to this particular event as the knee of the downward curve that bent for British civilization.
I have no other words for this. If it isn’t a sick joke, it is justification of rape.
Boromir's Horn says
What will it take for the world to put forth a concerted effort to “flatten the curve” of Islamic extremism?
John Kendall says
Where r the feminists?
James Lincoln says
Probably marching against white male privilege, John.
Wellington says
Good one, James. Western feminists (there are exceptions of course but not many) reveal, OMG, the female gender can produce fools galore just as much as the male gender can.
P.S. I’m pretty sure this won’t be taught in that bogus major which is Women’s Studies unless it be to castigate conservative women who realize what a farce modern Western feminism has become.
gravenimage says
John Kendall sounds envious about stoning women to death.
gravenimage says
The idea that I am “attacking men” by taking issue with stoning women to death is simply grotesque. I don’t like a lot of the harpies who present themselves as feminists these days, but I don’t think they should be stoned to death–I actually *oppose* this barbarism.
Does John Kendall condemn this savagery himself? Not so he will say.
gravenimage says
John Kendall wrote:
“The idea that I am “attacking men”…”
A feminist leftard.
…………………………
No–opposing stoning women to death does *not* make me a “feminist leftard”.
Decent Anti-Jihadists–in fact, all decent Americans–oppose this. Robert Spencer certainly does.
More:
I am pointing out the reality of our enemy. U (sic), gravenimage, should focus on removing our enemies from our homeland. Small wonder y (sic) we r (sic) in this predicament.
…………………………
Actually, that is not what John Kendall has been doing in his posts on this thread at all.
Moreover, who does he consider to be our enemies? Previously he has refused to say that he would prefer to live next to Anti-Jihadists if they are not white, than Jihadists if they are. So it seems that he considers those like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Jihad Watch’s own Christine Douglas-Williams to be the enemy, rather than ravening Muslims.
More:
Next up u’ll (sic) post ‘yea, but, not all Muslims…’. I don’t care if 1% or 10% or whatever % of Muslims harm our people. Their presence in our country does not benefit US. U (sic), gravenimage, don’t even identify with the “US”.
…………………………
Well, this is ludicrous. I constantly speak out against allowing foolishly Muslim immigration into the West, applaud things like Trumps’s “Muslim ban”, and approve of deporting Muslims starting with the worst Jihadists. I have noted how heartening proposals like this one are:
“Trump administration launches new unit to strip US citizenship from foreign-born terrorists”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/02/trump-administration-launches-new-unit-to-strip-us-citizenship-from-foreign-born-terrorists
So where does John Kendall get his claims about me? He has to make things up, because he has nothing else.
More:
We were fools(even before 9/11) to allow into our country what is not for Our Common Good. If it is not for Our Common Good, then, it’s no good. And, speaking about Our Common Good, here is yer another eg: California Governor wants to also give Our $2+ Trillion package the POTUS signed to illegals! To people who aren’t even supposed to b in our country! Let me spell this out – THIS GOES AGAINST THE CONMON GOOD.
…………………………
This last is also common with John Kendall. He has repeatedly pretended that since I haven’t cravenly abandoned the state of my birth that this means I agree with every foolish and illegal policy here. What rot.
More:
Small wonder y (sic) we r (sic) in this predicament of losing our country. I have identified the problem, &, it is US.
…………………………
John Kendall can pretend that opposing the horrors of stoning is part of the problem, but this simply is not so. Note that he *still* will not condemn it.
gravenimage says
I believe in equal rights for women, and I condemn this vicious apologia for child rape.
Efthimios Seretis says
Why is everyone bowing to Islam. Rape is rape, no matter who does it. It’s a crime. Maybe she should go to a no go zone and allow herself to get raped and be proud to be a victim.
Save Europe says
She wouldn’t (get raped) for several reasons.
The one common denominator which always came up in the vastest majority of these cases – the perpetrators would constantly espouse language such as ‘white b*tch’ and ‘infidel whore’, towards the victims.
Shah is neither white, nor an infidel.
She is, however, a b*tch.
Ramiul says
?? have her put a full length burqa on.. and walk amongst the muslim men in their community while screaming obscenities at them for their raping ways… ? any bets upon how quickly she would be gang raped, throttled and stoned to death? ? Problem solved.
Uer welcome ?
Roland says
The Labour Party is unable to reform itself. Naz Shah has a runaway mouth. Unfortunately both Labour and Conservatives have failed to protect hundreds of thousands of non-Muslim British girls.
Hank Mansfield says
Everything I’ve seen on this nationwide pedophile network lends to a picture of young ethnic British girls (for the most part) being taken out of parental custody and put into group homes. Seems like the Muslim pedophiles would waste no time sending out a ‘Romeo’ offering companionship, which quickly became an introduction to ‘gifts’ of drugs and alcohol and emotional manipulation.
As the mistreatment progressed, there would be additional pedophiles ‘sharing’ these girls among the adult Muslim community, even to the point of transporting them to other towns when they got bored with them.
I hypothesized on these boards once that given the length of time and the geographical extent, there had to have been bribes changing hands. That was quickly shut down.
Absent that, and with this woman’s statement taken into account, could it be that the ongoing abuse of these girls was allowed to take place for the sake of diversity? If a guy like Tommy Robinson really did notice this long before ANY British policeman or public official and risked everything just to make it public knowledge then that’s got to be the worst advertisement for the British governing class possible.
Save Europe says
Not just ethnically British girls, Hank.
I’m not Sikh, myself, but we are also aware – here in the U.K. – that it’s also Sikh British girls. This man, in the link below, has become quite prominent. He’s a great man.
I’d really like to see Robert and/or Jamie Glazov, do a link-up with this fine Gent ?
http://dailysikhupdates.com/sikhs-response-pakistani-muslim-grooming-gangs/
gravenimage says
Yes–all are fair game, so long at they are Infidels.
Keys says
Should I shut up ?
“Me too ?”
Hank Mansfield says
First time ever a comment of mine went to moderation, hope it’s just because I use more than one form of sign-in.
If it’s because I used the words ‘bribes’ and ‘public officials’ in the same sentence I’ll try not to do that anymore.
n says
Agree with HM. Bribery is a hallowed part of Islam, since it was the sacred example of Mohammed. I believe that British MPs are being bribed by groups connected to the Muslim Brotherhood and national governments.
Hank Mansfield says
I think it was a sign-in problem. Other submissions are going through now.
gravenimage says
Hank, this just has to do with your sign-in, not the content of your posts.
Y Iamu says
The Ilhan Omar of British politics.
The destruction of western culture is the aim.
Peter WF says
I love the way diversity is trumped up to be soooo good.
It is soooo good that if a diverse person is violent to you you should be quiet – NO NOT LIKELY.
Since the landing on the moon diversity has become soooo important. Yet when since 1969 has anything as daring and successful as the moon landings happened? Diversity, inclusion etc. are tripe.
Diversity is one marketing term that promotes migration to the affluent countries. It preys on 2nd and 3rd world countries for their skilled people. In the 1st world countries it makes the job of a polly much easier as migration is a sure way of growing an economy and therefore avoiding recessions. Recessions could cause the polly to loose government.
It also manipulates the employment market. It keep labour costs down and it is the young that are hit the hardest.Is it the only economic market that can legally be manipulated?
Without the skilled people how is the 3rd world going to bring themselves up?
Lets see how India copes with the chinese virus without the doctors etc. that have left for better monied climates! Now that is diversity!
mortimer says
Does anyone think Naz Shah is really concerned about ‘diversity’ or ‘equality’ or ‘harmony’? She just wants the Muslim rapists to get no bad publicity or shaming.
What British rape gang would be allowed to tell their victims to ‘shut up’? Would Naz Shah not be the first to condemn British men who raped Muslim girls? She certainly would.
Let’s apply the rule of ‘the-shoe-on-the-other-foot’. If British nationalists were raping Muslim girls, would Naz Shah tell the Muslim victims to ‘shut up’? Of course not.
That’s how you test ‘equality’.
Hank Mansfield says
Are you British? After all these years of reading about this from across an ocean and taking heat for just hinting that it was going on it escapes me how this pedophile network wasn’t common knowledge.
Tongues would be wagging if an underage female who wasn’t related to me was seen riding in a vehicle with me during daylight.
revereridesagain says
There are pedophile networks here in the States that no one wants to believe exist either. I’ve known cases of traffickers and abusers spared prosecution for reasons of “national security” (as characterized by a military judge). It’s easy to hide things that most people don’t want to know exist. Now that includes Muslim pedophile gangs under the protection of “Islamophobia” taboos.
Safety in Numbers such as "45 ACP" says
I disagree. Many a Muslim girl has been raped in Britain, and often enough by her co-religionists. Why do I say this? Well, consider. If a Muslim girl were to report her rape, even if by a Muslim man, there is the real possibility that her family would kill her for ‘dishonoring’ them. So, Naz Shah may ‘caution’ her Muslim sisters to ‘shut up’ for their own safety.
So, ‘keep silent’ seems to be the Muslim demand regarding ANY type of Muslim Male mistreatment of any woman, not just Kafirs.
I wish Britain had a rule REQUIRING all women to carry a loaded pistol, with fingerprint ID to prevent misuse, and a built-in GPS and shot camera for evidence of proper use. Wouldn’t want any innocent man to be killed.
SRIDHAR says
You are right. Why Muslims are seeking diversity only in Christian or Hindu countries? Why there is no diversity in Muslim countries??
Joseph Dockemeyer says
Exactly. Because muslims don’t tolerate any religion but Islam. Several years ago, I ran across a post regarding a muslMu woman. It may have been Saudu Arabia. She stood up in front of her people and advised the men to take infidel sex slaves. She said it was recommended in Quran.
Carolyn Marlin says
Sir is UK leaders all Kenites ?????????
gravenimage says
What is your obsession with this small Biblical tribe?
mortimer says
MP Naz Shah lies … her words are a contradiction in terms! You don’t even have to work to see the lie.
You can’t have ‘community harmony’ if the largest sector of that community … the native Britons … are being told to ‘shut up’ about a valid grievance that has been proved in court beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a crafty deception … doublespeak … by Naz Shah.
The purported ‘Shadow Minister of State for Women and Equalities’ is not concerned at all about British women who are rape victims nor about equality before the law for the British victims of the crimes. Do British girls not have the right to political representation to defend their rights? Apparently not, for Naz Shah believes raped British girls have no rights. Someone should ask her if British girls have a right to be defended. I am sure Shah’s answer would be a further evasion. Someone should ask her.
Apparently, Naz Shah wants to institute Sharia law by other means … by secular means. For 1400 years, dhimmis have been forced to accept the non-stop Muslim rape of kafirs. Rape is a constant theme in the annals of dhimmis in countries occupied by Muslim empires.
In fact,Sharia law contains no punishment for the rape of a kafir woman. Sharia lets the rapist go scot free. Rape is only a crime in Sharia if the victim is a Muslim woman or a slave girl owned by a Muslim.
Muslims have never been concerned about the feelings of the kafir … never in the previous 1400 years. And not now.
It’s an obvious deception … it’s a form of taqiyya called ‘KITMAN’ … deception by doubletalk … a sacred part of verbal jihad.
Conclusion: Muslims in UK want to control all speech.
Hank Mansfield says
She obviously means that all the Muslim pedophiles that escaped successful prosecutions have sincerely repented and there’s no more industrial-scale abuse happening, so continuously bringing up the subject is counter-productive.
…and then again you may be right about that Shariah via the backdoor.
gravenimage says
From what she says, she doesn’t care if Muslim rapists have repented or stopped raping–just so long as Infidels are not allowed to talk about it.
mortimer says
Bravo to Rebecca Hilsenrath who stated: “We need to keep the victims of these horrific crimes at the heart of the debate and always remember that diversity is not served by silence.”
Indeed.
Silence never helps the victims. Only the perpetrators.
gravenimage says
+1
somehistory says
The devil is in the details. Literally. satan the devil has the world by the throat, proven by this evil being visited on the children in the U.K.
TKF says
When it comes to Islam you can either resist or submit. It’s clear what the UK has decided to do. So now Brits…get you faces in the dirt, your asses in the air and prepare to receive Allah. Linkum!
Save Europe says
Thanks for that!
Sweeping generalisation, excused!
I – and many others – won’t be doing that.
We DO have our asinine, vile, odious, Leftards in the U.K.
You also have Democrats – and soft Republicans in the USA.
Bush Jr – ‘Islam is a religion of Peace.’
Laughing about it, is merely ‘fear transferral.’
Stop being disingenuous, and let’s stick together as like minded people who are horrified at the progression of Islam into the West!
gravenimage says
Yes–we are all in trouble, and we all need to stand together.
Michael Copeland says
“Shah has accused her government …of allowing “hatred and bigoted views to become legitimised.””
Hatred and bigoted views. Dear oh dear!
“love the muslims and hate the kuffaar” – muslimsagainstvoting
“Muslims in the West must have enmity and hatred of kaffirs” – islamqa.com
“hate them, disown them and their religion” – http://www.alminbar
“As a muslim, I must have hatred for everything non-Islam” – Choudary
“Kuffar should be treated with contempt” – A Murad
Something for the Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion to work on?
https://gatesofvienna.net/2020/02/islams-agenda-muslims-speak/
gravenimage says
Thanks for that grim, list, Michael.
Michael Copeland says
Translation
“Community Cohesion”……………..Privilege for muslims
https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/04/a-lexicon-for-politically-correct-multiculturalists/
Wellington says
Yuck.
Jayell says
‘8hah has accused her government of “failing to stand with minority communities” and of allowing “hatred and bigoted views to become legitimised.”…..
Whilst she mouths off her own brand of bigotry…..of the muslim minority kind. And doesn’t realise that she’s doing it!
There isn’t much ‘cohesion’ in.the UK between then majority British and Shah’s kind. Now there’ll be even less.
OTTER says
She should be asked to formally state who committed the rapes and that she is fine with them as a principle. Muslims always have it backward: Don’t report on our evil but how dare you say we committed evil?
I have concluded that the left is irremediable in its support of Islam and will do anything to enable it to flourish. The only thing the left is concerned about is that the ‘right’ should not be seen as being right on anything.
Wellington says
“Muslims always have it backward.”
Pretty much sums up 1400 years of Islam, OTTER. Yes, a few exceptions here and there but this was virtually always IN SPITE OF, NOT BECAUSE OF, Islam.
The two finest Islamic thinkers, Avicenna and Averroes, who were still only second-rate compared to great Christian thinkers like Augustine, Erigena {my personal favorite}, Anselm and Aquinas, and as Bertrand Russell and others have noted, were in big trouble from Islamic clerics because they dared to “think outside the box.” No “thinking outside the box” permitted in Islam, that’s for sure, repressively closed system which it remains to this very day.
Bottom line: Islam is a “fine” recipe for the closing of the mind. Few silly and idiotic ideologies, be they secular or religious, finer—if any.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“No “thinking outside the box” permitted in Islam, that’s for sure, repressively closed system which it remains to this very day.”
I’ve spent decades learning, reasoning, thinking, etc. Sometimes “in the box” sometimes “outside of the box”.
I love “creative thinking” and also the use of “factual evidence-based logic.”
I would be in a horrific mental state if I were forced to have a closed mind.
islam robs both your mind and soul…
Jim Austin says
Limeys readily sacrifice the safety of their women for the sake of diversity.
Save Europe says
Not all. Stop generalising please, ‘Septic Tank.’
gravenimage says
There are still patriotic Britons. Just home there are enough.
gravenimage says
hope there are enough
James Lincoln says
Looks like the UK has finally caught up to Sweden. And as we all know, the Swedish “Stockholm Syndrome” knows no bounds. Here is a link to an article that I had come across:
“Sweden: Feminist Mother Refuses to Report Muslim Refugee After He sexually abused her 12-year-old daughter”
https://www.savemysweden.com/sweden-feminist-refuses-muslim-sexually-abused-daughter/
gravenimage says
Hideous link, James.
gravenimage says
Two more perverse things from that story:
She was also reportedly a vehement supporter of the #MeToo movement against the sexual assault of women, but not presumably if those women are sexually assaulted by migrants.
And:
The Afghan received just 100 hours of community service for the assault and will not be deported.
The response from the state is hopeless dhimmitude, as well.
Save Europe says
Honestly? Yes we have a MAJOR problem here in the U.K., but we are behind – unquestionably Sweden, France, Belgium, then Germany – in that order. Not that it’s any solace….
Malmo – second highest rape capital in the world. Car burning in Sweden.
France – Gaza Strip style rioting/car burning plus an obscenely high Muslim population.
Belgium – Muslim political parties springing up – Islam Party and Sharia 4 Brussels.
Germany – mobs molesting and raping in the OPEN like Cologne.
schwami says
The more and more I look at Muslim elites – politicians, journalists, actors, poets and intellectuals, I am always surprised to note – they have no sense of fairness or justice or impartiality. They are so biased and so have so strong us-versus-them, it is mind boggling. I fail to understand why they hate us so much.. why they are so brazen and why they lie so much..
When I see their work and comments in India, it becomes very difficult for me to trust them. It seems like I am losing trust in them a bit everyday.
Michael Copeland says
They hate because they are instructed to hate.
They lie because they are authorised to lie.
“Us versus them ” – Tariq Ramadan
tim gallagher says
Absolutely unbelievable. What a vile piece of garbage this Naz Shah must be. The assumption behind this is that “diversity” is always good. I think diversity is fine if , say, we are talking about Buddhists and other non-Muslims, but when it comes to evil, totally barbaric Islam (which has nothing good, but only evil garbage to bring to any country) this much vaunted thing, diversity, is evil and is a negative. When it comes to islam, it truly is always them or us. If Islam wins, life will be appalling for all of us, and there’ll be zero diversity, as is the case in all Muslim, totalitarian countries – it is surely huge hypocrisy when any Muslim talks about being in favour of diversity. Islam crushes diversity when it has power. As Robert Spencer often says, “Are we diverse enough yet?” Islam has nothing of worth to bring to any civilised, non-Muslim country? 100% incompatible with our values.
James Lincoln says
tim, I read your post – twice.
100% accurate – how I wish that it were not…
tim gallagher says
It is the hypocrisy of any follower of Islam lying and saying that they support “diversity” that got me, James. In any unfortunate place where islam gains power, you can kiss diversity goodbye, and say hullo to the persecution of any ideology that is not Islamic. But any lie will be used by Muslims if it helps their effort to take over. We just have to get enough people in our societies to wake up and tell the Muslim enemies that we aren’t buying any of their bullshit. As I said up above, I’m quite happy with some degree of diversity, but not where Islam is involved. I don’t want Islam to be involved in our societies in any way whatsoever.
gravenimage says
Yes–Muslims are glad to use any Infidels’ ideas against them.
Rufolino says
A Moslem demanding diversity. For now. But diversity is not her final destination. Diversity today is just her foot in the door. When she reaches her planned destination diversity will not be permitted to exist.
tim gallagher says
That’s it, gravenimage and Rufolino. Islam and diversity are polar opposites. I was thinking how cynical it is (as well as hypocritical) for a Muslim to be rabbiting on about diversity. But they have no morality at all and so they’ll say and do anything to push their rotten cause. And as you say, gravenimage, they are using infidels’ ideas, so they’d be laughing at us as they tell their lies to us.
Keys says
“Democracy is like a train: when you reach your destination, you get off” – Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Guess what the destination is.
Sharia, of course !
Most Muslims desire to live under Sharia. That is a statistic for certain conflict.
A fatal flaw of free Western Democracy:
1. Muslims gain the majority vote.
2. Muslims vote in Sharia law.
3. The Death of free Western Democracy.
Majority rules !
tim gallagher says
Yep, that’s definitely the Muslim agenda, Keys. The only solution is to keep the Muslim enemy out, so they never can get to the point of becoming a majority. If only the population of our countries would wake up to the Muslim agenda and have the door slammed on the Muslim enemy. The majority of Hungarians and a few other countries are awake and vote to keep Muslims out. Majority rules in those sensible, wide awake countries. Muslims and Sharia can go to hell.
Kepha says
This is indeed vile. If there are gangs terrorizing people, people should speak up. Since our “liberated” and “woke” element is supposedly on the side of victimized women and girls, ti should loudly condemn these rape gangs, even if someone’s culture sanctions it. Perhaps the Islamic community might make itself considerably more acceptable if it turned in the members of the rape gangs. Surely someone has to know outside the circle of the gangs themselves and their victims.
somehistory says
They “know” and what is more, they approve. Just as this creepy woman does who said the girls should just “shut up’ about it.
Haven’t we all read about the females who are in favor of young girls, even babies, being mutilated for islam, with many of the mutilators being female? And the isis ‘brides’ who helped control the slaves their terrorist husbands captured or bought?
The male moslims not caught, would never turn in a fellow rapist; the male moslims who haven’t taken part in the “gangs” wouldn’t turn in their fellow moslims; and the wives, sisters, mothers, wouldn’t dare…even if by some chance they wanted to say something to the authorities.
islam is evil through and through, and it produces only evil in those enthralled by it.
b.a. freeman says
” … with our matches and our necklaces … ”
—
this is one of the more disgusting quotes by that bigoted woman (mandela). the “necklaces” were tires doused/filled with gasoline, draped around a victim’s neck, which the “matches” lit. it is a gruesome form of murder, and the b**ch was *not* called to task by the nazis running legacy media. those on the left will claim that it was “only” an over-agressive response to brutal mistreatment, but murder is *M*U*R*D*E*R*, and there is *N*O* f***ing excuse whatsoever for either the act or that comment. it stands to reason that another bigot would echo the sentiment, highlighting once again the utter evil of the poisonous piracy and death cult of islam.
Save Europe says
Totally agreed B.A!
?
gravenimage says
UK’s new Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion: Muslim rape gang victims should “shut up for the good of diversity”
In 2017, UK Labour MP Naz Shah not only “liked,” but retweeted a tweet saying that girls who were victimized by Muslim rape gangs needed to “shut their mouths for the good of diversity.” Rather than face consequences, she was promoted the following year by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to “a frontbench role as Shadow Minister of State for Women and Equalities in his Shadow Cabinet.”
……………………..
What is better for women and their equality than supporting their being gang raped as children? Maybe this:
Now his successor, Sir Keir Starmer, “has also shown favour to Shah, appointing her to the newly created post of Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion.”
……………………..
What is better for “community cohesion” than supporting the members of one part of the “community” to rape those of another part?
This is perverse beyond belief.
More:
More recently, Shah marked the death of Nelson Mandela’s widow Winnie Mandela by sharing a picture of her alongside one of her more infamous quotes: “Together, hand in hand, with our matches and our necklaces, we shall liberate this country.”….
……………………..
For any who do not know, the benign sounding “necklacing” refers to putting tires around victims’s heads, filling them with gasoline, and setting them alight, resulting in one of the most excruciating murders imaginable. This atrocity was typically done to Black South Africans who were deemed insufficiently radical.
That this Muslim thug keeps rising in Britain is just horrifying.
Rufolino says
Agreed. This evil woman’s tolerance by the British Parliament, and her promotion by the new Labour Leader is indeed “horrifying”. There is “something rotten” in the UK State alright, and the thought is turning all right thinkers into Hamlets, dicing with despair.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Rufolino. But I hope decent Britons get righteously angry, not depressed.
Ren says
Is Naz Shah a muslima? No wonder she is stupid.
gravenimage says
Yes, she’s a supremacist Muslim. And unfortunately it is too many Britons who are stupid or in denial.
Battle says
Naz Shah needs Jesus.
Save Europe says
Preferably deportation. Reasoning with people like her and trying to convert them doesn’t work.
Besides, they’re obsessed with trying to convert us. Let’s not do the same thing as them. It gives them ammunition when debating them about their vile ideology.
Merely point out the MASSIVE negative elements of their religion. Simple!
UNCLE VLADDI says
Re: “It is ironic that Naz Shah is accepted as an outspoken “anti-hate” activist when she promotes it herself through her disdain for the young white British girls who were raped by Muslim gangs. Shah has accused her government of “failing to stand with minority communities” and of allowing “hatred and bigoted views to become legitimised.” Following the firestorm over her retweet in 2017, she deleted the retweet and “unliked” the post. But she escaped all accountability for her own actions.”
(Yeah, hypocrites are like that, aren’t they?)!
gravenimage says
I don’t think it is so much that she is a hypocrite–it is more that she will pretend to hold any stance so long as it enables Islam.
Garrett Driscoll says
Ignorance feeds evil. She is a great example.
Badger says
She’s a muslim. What do you expect?
David says
Islam is a problem because governments allow it to be a problem. Hungary doesn’t: NO PROBLEM! Do not tolerate the intolerable!
E T says
Nah Shaw, Ilhan Omar, Iqra Khalid, all Muslims should be removed from office. Shari’ah law does NOT supersede all laws of any land no matter how many manic Muslims tell you it does.
Naz Shaw is a disgrace. She and her peoplekind sicken society.