The Cambridge Dictionary defines the term “in situ” as “in the original place, or the place where something should be,” or, alternatively, “in the original place instead of being moved to another place.” In the world of archaeology, there is nothing more valuable than finding an object “in situ” as it gives the ancient room, building and town where the object was found, important context in both time and purpose. Unfortunately, due to ancient sites being raided for centuries, most historical finds are traded in the black market, destroying the ability to accurately relay the provenance of the object and the story of the place from which it was taken.
However, last week the world was blessed by two remarkable discoveries in the City of David, just south of the Old City of Jerusalem’s external walls, of ancient Jewish objects found in situ.
In the ruins of what is currently thought to be a large municipal building dating back to the 6th or 7th century BCE, was a clay seal bearing the inscription “LeNathan-Melech Eved HaMelech – which translates to “[belonging] to Nathan-Melech, Servant of the King.” Such servant to the king is mentioned in the Hebrew Bible in 2 Kings 23:11.
The second item is a blue agate seal saying “LeIkar Ben Matanyahu” – “(belonging) to Ikar son of Matanyahu.”
Finding these two items in their original location is a blessing and curse for many. For those people who enjoy learning about history, these ancient Jewish finds in what is believed to be the original capital of the unified kingdom of Israel under King David is considered an important piece of the puzzle to understanding the location and way of life of the Jewish people in Jerusalem thousands of years ago. However, for those people who want to see modern Jews evicted from Jerusalem in favor of Arabs, the findings present an obstacle in convincing Jews that they should abandon their history and religion.
Like the finding of the seal of King Hezkiah in Jerusalem in December 2015, and the burnt remains of a Torah scroll found in a synagogue in Ein Gedi, these findings attest to the long history of Jews living throughout the area east of the Green Line. Arab news sites like Al Jazeera refuse to print any of these stories, in an effort to continue to lie to its readership about the history of the Jews in the holy land which predates Islam by thousands of years.
The incredible discoveries makes one consider the two alternative definitions for “in situ” described above: the ancient Jewish finds in Jerusalem were located “in the original place instead of being moved to another place,” while the modern Israeli Jews themselves and the capital of the Jewish State are “in the original place, or the place where something should be,” in Jerusalem.
Related First.One.Through articles:
The New York Times will Keep on Telling You: Jews are not Native to Israel
Subscribe YouTube channel: FirstOneThrough
Join Facebook group: FirstOne Through Israel Analysis and FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The Remarkable Tel Jerusalem | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The New York Times All Out Assault on Jewish Jerusalem | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Is Columbia University Promoting Violence Against Israel and Jews? | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Ramat Shlomo, Jerusalem and Joe Biden | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Trump’s “eastern Jerusalem” and Biden’s “East Jerusalem” | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The Green Line Through Jerusalem | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Bad Education: Al Jazeera | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: NY Times Manufactures “Palestinian East Jerusalem” Narrative | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Jerusalem, Israel. One and Only | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Pros And Cons Of Muslims Considering Jewish Holy Sites As Sacred Also | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: New York Times Recycles Story To Slam Israel While The Country Mourns Its Dead | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Jews In Jerusalem Still Fighting For ‘Social Justice’ | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The Year 2023: Entry To The Holy Land | FirstOneThrough