All over the world, we see it on virtually a daily basis: Islamic supremacists use intimidation as a weapon to paralyze their foes and get what they want, in matters large and small, professional and personal. And here we are again.
“Tariq Ramadan case: the psychiatric report that afflicts him,” translated from “Affaire Tariq Ramadan : le rapport psychiatrique qui l’accable,” Valeurs Actuelles, May 20, 2020:
According to an expert opinion consulted by Le Figaro, the theologian used “contempt, lies and manipulation on his victims”.
Having decided to focus his defense on the racism and Islamophobia of which he claims to be a victim, Tariq Ramadan will have to consult, in the case between him and several complainants, with experts to say the least compromising thing: according to this document, consulted by Le Figaro, the preacher is said to have heavily tried, psychologically and sexually, the women who accuse him of rape.
“A mixture of extreme violence”
The psychological report was drawn up by Dr Daniel Zagury on behalf of the three investigating judges in charge of the case. The doctor met with all of the French complainants, including “Christelle” (an assumed name) and Henda Ayari. Objective: to determine the nature of their relationship with Tariq Ramadan. The result is a “massive idealization for a known, respected and admired person”, a “submission”, or even “a set of mechanisms which allow a psyche to exercise all power over another psyche, for its sole benefit and without consideration for the desire of the other ”.
The expert distinguishes several phases, one of which consists of “intense romantic feelings” which led the two women mentioned above “to consent to sexual intercourse”. However, these complainants did not consent to the acts mentioned “as a mixture of extreme violence”. According to Henda Ayari’s lawyer, Jonas Haddad, “two conditions must be met to be able to characterize rape”, including the sexual act. The latter was “recognized by Tariq Ramadan,” said the lawyer. He adds that the other condition “was the absence of Ms. Ayari’s consent. “The qualification of right-of-way clearly answers this,” he said.
“Lack of consent”
As for “Christelle”, she seems to have lived her relationship with the preacher, notes the psychiatrist, in “a mixture of disbelief, intense satisfaction and narcissistic restoration, against a background of emotional deficiency in childhood”. Therefore, “the facts are recounted as a traumatic event dominated by surprise, violence and the absence of consent for imposed practices”, as can be read in the report.
RichardL says
He took the Martin Luther too seriously: he is a disgusting, foulmouthed Jew-hater like Luther was.
RichardL says
Martin Luther of islam comparison. Got carried away… I know too many Muslim “academics’ just like him and they are almost all frauds fawned on by leftards in academia
Jack Holan says
Who knows for a privileged one from Oxford in France, grandson of the Founder of the Muslim Brotherhood whether he will be found guilty in this alleged Hall of Justice; for three women brutalized by a thug with a silver tongue and genteel clothes. Don’t forget a few years ago a Muslim Anti-Semite who taunted a elderly Holocaust widow ran up 3 flights stabbed her and through her out the window. He was exonerated. The, before her there was a Jewish man her was picked up by terrorists and tortured. Had the police acted on intelligenve he might have been saved. We’ll await the verdict and sentence in this case.
mortimer says
Psychiatrist Dr Daniel Zagury is describing the personality of MOHAMMED that we see in the hadiths and Sira.
He might consider how it is that practically ALL Muslim dictators have the same personality flaws.
gravenimage says
France: Report on accused rapist Tariq Ramadan says he used “contempt, lies and manipulation on his victims”
……………….
No surprise here…
mortimer says
Response to RichardL : the equivalent of Martin Luther in Islam would be Sheikh Muhammad Bin Wahhab.
In the 18th Century, Sheikh Muhammad Bin Wahhab led a ‘back-to-basics’ religious reform of Islam. He was a religious thinker who was adopted by the tribal leaders who later became the Saudi Royal Family. His ideas, which are a revival of the general principles of the Hanbali mahab (school) of Sharia (i.e. Muslim law) jurisprudence, hold that sharia law is based exclusively on the Koran and the Haddith (i.e. sayings of the prophet Mohamet). These ideas are commonly referred to as Wahhabism, although a more accurate description would be Salafism (following the path of the pioneers).
At that time in the 18th Century, the Saudis launched a jihad, inspired by Wahhab, to
conquer the whole Arabian Peninsula. They declared that any of their fellow Sunni Muslims
who did not adhere to Wahhabism were in fact infidels, and should be killed. They would send a messenger into townships carrying a Koran in one hand, and a sword in the other.
The choices were clear: the Book or the Blade – either surrender to the Saudis and become
Wahhabis, or be put to death as infidels.