Here is yet another indication of the overall laxity of the BoJo government with regard to immigration:
Immigration could easily spin out of control as it did under Labour. The only way to avoid a crisis is to put a cap on the numbers and then adjust as necessary.
The report below is based on a “so-called Australian-style point-based immigration system” which “leaves Britain open to around 660 million migrant workers, as it has no cap on overall numbers.” Johnson, “despite being by turns hailed and vilified by many Conservative voters as a migration hawk at the head of a ‘hard right’ Cabinet, has never displayed any serious opposition to mass migration.”
The UK government’s laxity on illegal migration, if not ended, will lead to a major shift in the demographics of the UK, and with it, government policy, which will be enforced in favor of globalists and Islamic supremacists. Of course, these shifts have been in evidence for quite some time. Many had hoped Johnson’s government would change the country’s course. That does not look likely now.
The UK should be implementing policy to preserve its cultural heritage and the rule of law. This is clearly not being done.
“Think Tank Warns BoJo’s Uncapped Migration System Leaves UK Open to 660 Million Migrants,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, July 30, 2020:
Migration Watch UK has warned that Boris Johnson’s so-called Australian-style point-based immigration system leaves Britain open to around 660 million migrant workers, as it has no cap on overall numbers.
Migration Watch has calculated the number of people beyond the European Union who would be eligible to apply for visas under the new system “to be at least 590 million”, according to an analysis sent to Breitbart London.
The think tank estimates that, on top of this, “the likely pool of EU nationals will be 77 million” — leaving employers “able to draw on a worldwide pool of more than 667 million.”
Migration Watch, Farage Warn Boris Immigration Bill May INCREASE Migrant Influx https://t.co/QXoxLz32cn
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) May 19, 2020
Migration Watch UK has long warned that the fabled “Australian-style points-based immigration system” long advocated by Nigel Farage, first as UKIP leader and then as Brexit Party leader, before it was taken up by Boris Johnson during his time as frontman for the Vote Leave campaign during the 2016 EU referendum, could actually increase net immigration if points are too easy to come by and there is no fixed annual cap on incomers.
Johnson, despite being by turns hailed and vilified by many Conservative voters as a migration hawk at the head of a “hard right” Cabinet, has never displayed any serious opposition to mass migration, and even campaigned for potentially millions of illegal aliens to be given an amnesty as Mayor of London and Foreign Secretary — and one of his first acts as Prime Minister was to scrap the Conservatives’ long-standing (if empty) pledge to reduce annual net immigration “from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands”.
Flashback: ‘Amnesty Boris’ on Illegals, Open Borders to Turkey, Migration Caps https://t.co/J3fr111BRH
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) July 23, 2019
Migration Watch UK is particularly concerned that the Government has “just ploughed on” with its new immigration system despite the fact it was drawn up before the onset of the Chinese coronavirus pandemic, which has put many local people out work — “As they have done before, employers will go for cheaper, non-unionised overseas labour,” the think tank warned….
james c.a. reid says
What do you mean? BoJo has an Immigration Policy! Certainly not being implemented. He makes former PM Neville Chamberlain look effective!!
Roger Woodhouse says
Bojo reached the pinacle of his career by becoming PM ,hes not going to spoil his short term in office by being ‘radical’.He will just do the bare minimum while he bides his time parading as PM..Immigration is far too touchy a subject to get involved with so he will pass the buck (as they all do)
RichardL says
he was born into the ruling class. I was shocked when people said he was different from the others. Last PM that was good was Thatcher. Then the UK was sold to islam
Templer says
So is the ?? usa
CogitoErgoSum says
Instead of paying foreigners to come work in your country, why not pay your own citizens to have children who will help build and maintain your country?
Daniel Triplett says
…As long as such pro-natalist policy and financial incentives are offered only to non-Muslim citizens, otherwise it’s destructive, not productive. Therein lies the foundation of the whole problem, both with pro-natalist incentives and immigration — how and for what reason do we exclude Muslims?
Is there something criminal about Islam or Muslims? If not, then why exclude them? And if there is something criminal with Islam and Muslims, then how do we justify denying natalist incentives and immigration, but allowing the Muslims already internal to our borders to continue practicing Islam and using dawah and womb jihad to expand Islam from within?
The way I see it, the whole problem must be addressed altogether — Islam is a Criminal Conspiracy pursuing our enslavement and extermination, and we’re not going to tolerate it, anywhere. Unless and until we make this collective decision, we’ll continue losing the war.
curious says
+1
Britain does have a pro-natalist policy for Muslims only: Britain subsidizes polygamous Muslim families, while prosecuting polygamous non-Muslims.
“Even though bigamy is a crime in Britain, the decision by ministers means that polygamous marriages can now be recognised formally by the state, so long as the weddings took place in countries where the arrangement is legal.
The outcome will chiefly benefit Muslim men with more than one wife, as is permitted under Islamic law.
***
Income support for all of the wives may be paid directly into the husband’s bank account, if the family so choose. Under the deal agreed by ministers, a husband with multiple wives may also be eligible for additional housing benefit and council tax benefit to reflect the larger property needed for his family.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/1577395/Multiple-wives-will-mean-multiple-benefits.html
curious says
P.S. For anyone who might not read the linked article, it is from 2008. Britain decided to recognize polygamy, for Muslims only, in 2008.
gravenimage says
Just disgusting.
Daniel Triplett says
That’s awful. Exhibit #1 about how pro-natalist policy can go off the rails real quick if the underlying problem isn’t honestly addressed.
Like a fireman aiming his water stream through the flames, without aiming it at the source of the fire below. Firemen aren’t that stupid, nor should we be.
NH Storbeck says
This surely is a scandal and its racist and its discriminatory against whites and Christians.
NH Storbeck says
Well summed up Daniel Triplett.
Roger Woodhouse says
Ignorance is bliss seems to be the mantra.The masses know nothing about Islam and its real threat to their way of lifeand our government is also playing a very dangerous game by allowing this ignorance to cintinue.TheArch bishop of Canterbury is a total failure in office.I hold him responsible for the demise of our Christian heritage due to his unwillingness to face up to Islam.
Reziac says
Exactly. Otherwise … well, one might dub it Pathological Equality: the notion that all men are equally capable of sustaining a culture the rest of us want to live in.
The only real solution is to wholly ban Islam, and to thereby ban Muslims, and harden our hearts to the good grass among them, for that grass hides too many snakes.
CogitoErgoSum says
Tax the mosques and collect a head tax on all who attend them. The Islamic god and the results Islam has produced in the countries where it dominates provide the example for the way to control and eliminate an unwanted religion.
CogitoErgoSum says
I just came across a news story about leftist “protestors” burning stacks of Bibles in Portland, Oregon. I assume those are Bibles that Christians gave to them to read or which, even more likely, they stole. However, if the Bibles are ones they purchased I say let them go ahead and burn their own money. Now, if they had ever bothered to purchase and read the books of Karl Marx they would be burning Korans also, but I am sure they are too stupid to understand Marx and too cowardly to burn the Koran.
J Morgan says
https://twitter.com/ericmetaxas/status/1289530040955187201
gravenimage says
Here’s this disgusting story, CogitoErgoSum:
https://thepostmillennial.com/left-wing-activists-burn-bibles-in-portland-anti-police-riot
Not sure who the Bibles belonged to.
Here in Oakland, rioters set fire to the Alameda County Courthouse, and scrawled “Kill the Police!”, “Kill All Judges!”, and “Blue Lives Don’t Matter!” on the building.
\Mayor Libby Schaaf *did* chide them–but only because rioting like this might lead Trump to send in Federal troops to protect the courthouse. And she is actually one of the saner leftist mayors…at least she is acting to stop “Defund the Police” here.
CogitoErgoSum says
People who write the F-word everywhere and on everything do not impress me as being of even average intelligence. I was just looking for a live stream of the Portland protests and when I clicked on one the first word I heard was, you guessed it, the F-word to be followed by its use four more times in the next two sentences spoken by a female “protestor.” I could not hear what the other people were saying but they were all just milling about aimlessly – no doubt the story of their lives. These people in the streets are NOT the best and brightest the U.S. has to offer.
Reziac says
Or more likely, Muslim Brotherhood operatives among them decided now was a good time to burn Bibles, and so they did, given that any suggestion suffices to get rioters to step up to new destructions.
Reziac says
“Rioters started a large fire in downtown Portland at the peaceful protest.”
Okay, now we know: every time we see the words “peaceful protest” we can swap ’em out for “riot” without changing the meaning one whit.
gravenimage says
Yes–now violent rioting and arson are “peaceful”…
NH Storbeck says
They are already paying them to have children, about £86 a month each kid.
Zé Manel Tonto says
That is a good idea, but it takes around 20 years for the newborns to get into the workforce.
40 years of low birthrates will not be fixed that way, as there are already more immigrants in the UK than there were unemployed British workers (pre lockdown job destruction).
There are not enough British workers to do all the jobs and I am not even going into skills and/or willingness to do them.
The question is not whether Western countries need immigrants, it is the background culture of those immigrants. But selecting based on that would be waycist…
Ecosse1314 says
Nothing new there. Tories have been as irresponsible with immigration as Labour. Figures seem very close to 666….wonder if there is a connection
J Morgan says
660 million migrant, “workers.” That is nearly double the population of the United States and there are only 66.65 million in the UK as it is. That is more than replacement population. Considering the migrants they are letting in: the most backward 7th century thinking, non working violent tyrants, it is suicidal. Boris must be stopped!
gravenimage says
Terrifying.
LB says
The population replacement (native extermination) plan in the UK (and the entire West in general) should be obvious to everyone by now. This has nothing to do with Boris; he is just a sock puppet following his puppeteers’ instructions, as did everyone else before him and as would anyone else who would become PM in his stead. Replacing him would achieve nothing. Replacing the entire UK governing body and all political elites on the other hand just might work. But such a thing will never happen without massive uprising French revolution style. Therefore, the UK is finished.
James Lincoln says
The only hope that the UK had was in 2019:
UKIP’s Gerard Batten, with the help of Tommy Robinson and Lord Pearson.
Of course, it didn’t happen – and the UK continues its downward trajectory.
Boris Johnson is proving to be a complete failure…
CogitoErgoSum says
Well, just look at the man. Look at him.
curious says
Anne Marie Waters founded For Britain, the only British party that stands for liberty and against Islam:
https://www.forbritain.uk/
Merri-joy says
Britain First are heroes – staning up for Britain and being persecuted for it!
Maureen Chaloner says
I support these activists and Tommy,so do millions more of us-but many wont tell you that for fear of losing their jobs! ….We still have hope for our country.
Phil Copson says
“I support these activists and Tommy,so do millions more of us – but many won’t tell you that for fear of losing their jobs! …”
——————————————————————————————–
The great thing about not having a job, being self-employed, or retired, is that losing it is not a concern….
I’ve contributed on multiple occasions to Tommy Robinson and Britain First and will continue to do do so. I’m not shy of telling people that I do either. Tommy Robinson is a decent working-class bloke who has been pushed too far and decided to stand up and do something about it.
Others should have his courage.
gravenimage says
Boris Johnson’s migration policy could leave Britain open to 660 million migrants
……………….
This is over *ten times* the entire population of Britain. Suicidal madness.
curious says
+1
Similar results could theoretically happen here. The Constitution says in Article 1, section 8:
“The Congress shall have Power…To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization….”
Congress can delegate some discretion to the President to execute the immigration laws within statutory parameters, but the power resides in the Congress. If 2/3 of each house of Congress voted to naturalize uniformly all applicants from Indonesia, Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh, then the USA could end up with a Muslim majority, and the President would not have power to stop them. If the President assented, then Congress would only need a majority vote in each house to do it.
If that sounds implausible, consider the recent vote to protect Islam in China:
“Trump signs bill pressuring China over Uighur Muslim crackdown
***
The bill, which Congress passed with only one “no” vote [Representative Thomas Massie, R-KY], was intended to send China a strong message on human rights by mandating sanctions against those responsible for oppression of members of China’s Muslim minority.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-xinjiang-idUSKBN23O3EW
As long as George W Bush and others insist on calling Islam a religion of peace, vulnerability to Islam persists. Mohamad took over Yathrib by sending Muslim “refugees” to foment internal dissent, and to advocate inviting Mohamad as a peacemaker. Within 5 years of his arrival, he had killed, enslaved, or exiled the entire population of Yathrib, which is now called Medina and reserved for Muslims only. Congress can vote to make Americans pay to import any number of Muslims, and exercising that Congressional power becomes even easier when the President cooperates, as most recent Presidents have done.
I do not consider such rapid replacement likely, but it is possible. Already, more than 10% of Americans were born in foreign countries. The Constitution grants Congress enough power theoretically to replace a majority of the electorate within a relatively short time, and recent votes have shown both major parties almost wholly corrupted by Nixon’s Petrodollar deals with KSA.
Following the Constitutional convention, “A lady asked [Ben] Franklin, “Well Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” “A republic,” replied the Doctor, “if you can keep it.” Indeed we have a republic and not a monarchy, but whether we can keep the Republic might depend on whether people continue to believe Prince George W Bush’s false claim about Islam.
James Lincoln says
Curious,
A very chilling post.
If Joe Biden wins the presidency, and the Democrats take over the Senate, anything is possible.
Super PACs are spending incredible amounts of money to take back Senate seats. For example, Sen. Susan Collins from Maine is very vulnerable.
I am very worried…
curious george says
curious
+1
………………………
Sadly, the handwriting is on the wall, the USA is circling the drain. The “global elite” have made massive strides in their quest for a One World Government. The USA is the last bastion of freedom and the enemy is marshaling all of its forces to bring it down. The question isn’t if it will happen but when.
gravenimage says
Muslim troll “Brian Hoff” (“DefenderofIslam”) has already said that Muslims will destroy the Constitution when they gain enough power.
Daniel Triplett says
Insightful post. Disturbing, but good nonetheless.
I was mistaken in believing the POTUS had more control over immigration. The Democrats will do a whole lot of damage as they gain power, just on demographics alone
And I knew we were in trouble when there was such near unanimous bi-partisan support for the Uighur Muslims. The Uighurs ignored the One Child policy, while the rest of the Chinese complied. The Uighurs have also been demanding their own territorial sovereignty, and they have waged jihad strikes upon the rest of the Chinese.
While civilized people may disagree with the methods with which the CCP is defending its sovereignty (organ harvesting, forced abortions, etc), our defending the Uighurs sets a dangerous precedent when it comes time to confront Islam ourselves. Are we trying to say the Uighurs deserve full freedoms to exercise their “religious” freedoms as they see fit? Or are we just disagreeing with the barbarics?
Seems to me like we’re giving Islam a free pass altogether, and it’s going to take a whole lot of effort to change the US national perspective on Islam.
Mike says
well when ever Muslim shows up to take over England
the English can go to the country fled
because the Muslims will destroy England just like they destroyed the land they are coming from
E T says
“When Muslims are in the minority they are very concerned with minority rights, when they are in the majority there are no minority rights”. Winston Churchill
Islam appeasers are totally brainwashed by left indoctrination, they are complacent and apathetic.
The Muslim Brotherhood hoods will tell you “The House of War is every land where Muslims do not yet rule – – – and where Islamists will FIGHT until they prevail, no matter how long it takes”.
PLAN:
1. Procreation – 4 wives, each producing children.
2. MEDIA – Political correct, anti Christian rhetoric.
3. Education – revising History, re-writing widely used textbooks. (Education City -Muslim’s investing over 400 million dollars to Universities.)
4. Economic- mass destruction of property.
5. Physical – MIGRATION, mass murder, rapes and terrorism.
6. Legal – Predatory lawsuits ( CAIR specializes in tearing people’s lives apart), demand for “Islamic Rights”.
7. Humanitarian – Charity for Muslims only – let non-Muslims starve. Darfur.
8. Political – SUBVERSION OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS— Nihad Awad working tirelessly to elect as many Muslims as possible in the up coming election. — more of the likes of Omar, Thalib, Ellison……….School boards, councils, mayors, appointing judges, anyone who will suppress FREEDOM of expression and Religion.
2:91. “Fight and kill unbelievers until “religion is Allah’s”. Islam rules ALL societies.
Daniel Triplett says
Yes, the Ummah has a long and patient strategy for victory. They are winning — we are losing. “Sword” jihad isn’t even the most effective tactic. All the other forms are, as you well catalogued. Just by hijra and womb jihad alone they will win over the next several hundred years, not to mention their sword tactics and nuke weapon strikes which are coming if we do nothing. 10 or 100 or 500 or 1000 years from now, it will happen if we do nothing and pretend this isn’t happening.
We haven’t even identified our enemy yet, much less developed a strategy to defeat it.
Peter35 says
660 million on top of the 68 million who already live there? Britain would be one colossal city, and the attendant problems with water, sewage, food, electric power and….
Forget it.
JoBo says
The Australian system has kept most of the scum out of Australia for 20 years.
gravenimage says
Still lots of Jihadists in Australia, I’m afraid.
Blunt bu honest says
Folks, Australia’s system has caps, notwithstanding they should be less (200K p.a. pre COVID19) now about 40K and falling. But there is a cap. So if the UK is to follow the Aussie policy, then there will be a cap. What that is ….. that’s an entirely different but related discussion…. if not, then it’s not the Aussie policy…. just sayin’
Jack Cade says
Zero: the ideal number of Muslims in a civilized (Western) country.
James Lincoln says
To your point, Jack:
“Dominik Tarczynski- ZERO immigrants will enter Poland illegally”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrA9rcF49LY
curious george says
+1
Khushi says
UK has a death wish.
E T says
I am beginning to understand why Obama’s education seditionists removed 19 History books from all libraries, one being The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire!
Don Ameche says
So much for BREXIT…. and so much for Boris being the British Trump !!!
OLD GUY says
NOT A GOOD IDEA BORIS. The problem is if Biden is elected he will open Americas borders to the same Muslim migration invasion taking place in Europe.
infidel says
What has even legal immigration achieved for the West…? ZILCH ZERO NOTHING except endless heartache and loss of its original culture. I’ve said it b4 repeatedly and say it again. The West would have done fine even without immigration.
And that being said, immigration to ur lands has robbed my own lands of its finest brains. It has cut both ways. But more damage has been done to U.
gravenimage says
Depends who you are talking about. There were a lot of immigrants from the 19th and 20th centuries who have become good patriotic Americans.
Muslims and MS-13 members, not so much…