The ‘mighty’ Robert Spencer and David Wood have exposed something that EVERYONE should hear: THESE ARE VERY BAD TIMES FOR ISLAM. The Koran is being exposed as a hoax and people are seeing that the CARTOON ISSUE is not going away, because it is a SYSTEMIC PROBLEM WITHIN SHARIA LAW.
The MURDER of BLASPHEMERS IS MANDATED BY SHARIA. Sharia cannot be changed or modernized.
A theoretical freedom of speech is USELESS if it is not actually used.
Nakul janasays
In the recent research revelation of total things related to isam as hoax ie Quran, Mohammad, Islam, Hadith, Sunna, Sira, Macca any cartoons of Muhammad is nothing more than a joke . Let the Muslim get their faith corrected and abandon the cooked framework of religion first before talking anything about islam. These ignorant people have no faith which is the base of their faith ie deception
mortimersays
Re Charlie Hebdo…the right to blaspheme includes defending its practice – Jonathan Chait
1) On the one hand, religious extremists should not threaten people who offend their beliefs. But 2) on the other hand, nobody should offend their beliefs. (So), the right to blasphemy should exist but only in theory. (Liberals) do not believe religious extremists should be able to impose censorship by issuing threats, but given the existence of those threats, the rest of us should have the good sense not to risk triggering them.
The line separating these two positions is perilously thin. The Muslim radical argues that the ban on blasphemy is morally right and should be followed; the Western liberal insists it is morally wrong, but should be followed. Theoretical distinctions aside, both positions yield an identical outcome.
The right to blaspheme religion is one of the most elemental exercises of political liberalism. One cannot defend the right without defending the practice.
– Jonathan Chait, Daily Intelligencer, January 7, 2015
Ismail Alisays
But the empty container like Robert Spencer didn’t understand this fact . He derives pleasure in faking Islamic doctrines.. I don’t really know his mission, till recently when I got to know that he has a psychiatric problem.. From his past drug intakes ..
CogitoErgoSumsays
Which Islamic doctrines do you say that Robert Spencer has faked?
FYIsays
Speaking of an ’empty container'{which could be used to describe an islamic ‘scholar’,apologist or troll},given that the islamic ‘holy’ book has recently become Holey{what with all the HOLES in the standard narrative}it seems an apposite visual metaphor for the koran is a ..colander[sieve].
The holey koran’s knowledge holds true as effectively as a colander holds water.
Samsays
Just the use of the term “jihad” is a nonsensical false use because it’s used to promote islamophobia,
I have asked a question, but no answer yet, so, here is my question again and again….
What’s the meaning and/or the definition of the Arabic”term” JIHAD in English? Please be as clear and as easy as you can, and if I may, let me repeat another question that I asked but no answer was given to me, here it is:-
Who are the biblical MEN OF RENOWN ?what happened to them and where are they now?
Thanks.
gravenimagesays
The idea that it is Robert Spencer who invented the term Jihad is absurd. Pious Muslims have been waging violent Jihad against unbelievers for 1400 years now.
As for the rest, “Sam” has claimed that all Jewish prophets are bad people–something that not even Islam claims. Doesn’t he know that his own coreligionists would violently target him for this?
And “Sam” claimed that he couldn’t properly make clear his love for Hitler, and that he would be explaining it all but had somehow been held back by using a phone. Still waiting…
Ade Fegansays
Go do some fact checking and go sit on the naughty step Ismael
(or quit with the taqqiya)
You may actually be saying is that Islamic doctrines
are big time bad and you don’t like them !
Samsays
Taqqya is just a politeness way of debating, nothing to hide or to lie about, just debate polite management… start to learn more so you won’t stay as stupid and as hateful as you are<<<< I'm not a Muslim, so I m not using taqqya, so I call you whatever I feel you are, this is ok sometimes, not good sometimes ?
gravenimagesays
Taqiyya is lying about Islam, to lull the Infidels into a false sense of security while Muslims plot violent Jihad. Characterizing lying as “a politeness way of debating” is just grotesque.
And “Sam’s” constant claims that he is not Muslim–while now whitewashing Taqiyya–makes this less plausible all the time.
Lynettesays
But you have been brainwashed all your life into believing all the b/s. Why not say what islamic doctrines he has faked? Remember you believe the islamic “right” of deceit, liars and more of the same ilk. You are the one with a Problem, a HUGE PROBLEM!!
gravenimagesays
Ismail Ali, like all pious Muslims, has no understanding of freedom of speech.
Pettersays
+1
mortimersays
Heckler’s Veto Definition: -“A heckler’s veto is an IMPERMISSIBLE content-based RESTRICTION on speech where the speech is prohibited due to an ANTICIPATED DISORDERLY or VIOLENT reaction of the audience.” – Justice Dolores Sloviter
-The ‘heckler’s veto’ is nothing but vigilante law or the law of a mob. No group attempting to administer a self-made law which vetoes the freedom of expression of others should be tolerated. The heckler’s veto is a crime against the majesty of the law which is the supreme dominant authority controlling the conduct of everyone, however exalted or high his power. The heckler’s veto is an attempt to overthrow free speech which is the law of the land, and in its place to set up mob law, lynch law, and to substitute lawlessness for the law enforcement which obtains in civilized countries.
– Heckler’s Veto Definition: A controversial legal position taken by law enforcement officers based on an alleged right to restrict freedom of speech where such expression may create disorder or provoke violence.
Michigan State University professor of political science William B. Allen has used the phrase “VERBAL TERRORISM” to refer to the same phenomenon (HECKLER’S VETO), defining it as…
… “calculated assault characterized by loud side-conversations, shouted interruptions, JABBERED FALSE FACTS, THREATS and PERSONAL INSULTS”
Free speech full of lies and hatreds from the. Pit of hell.
revereridesagainsays
Keep proving us right, Ali, keep proving us right. You are lunatics in thrall to an irrational, intolerant, hostile, violent fantasy and reality is your most feared and hated enemy.
CogitoErgoSumsays
It is true that sometimes free speech does contain lies and hate but, on the other hand, the best way to expose those lies and hate is through free speech for everyone and not just for some. Without freedom of speech for every human being the lies and hate of the tyrant go unexposed and unchallenged so that enslavement of both the body and mind of the many by the few becomes the rule of law upon the planet. My opinion is that God’s intention is for men to live as equals who may speak freely among themselves with their only fear being of not speaking the truth.
Separating lies from the truth requires freedom of speech as the success of the greatest of lies depends upon the failure of those who know the truth to speak out because they fear that speaking the truth will cost them much suffering and pain. Since God is Truth those who fear freedom of speech and that the truth will not ultimately overcome all lies demonstrate a lack of faith in the goodness of God. To be sure, freedom of speech is something that is not allowed in the dark pit of Hell … nor in Islam.
CogitoErgoSumsays
And as Monty Python used to say, now for something completely different:
(?)
Do not aim for the wrong target, and expose the lies.
Ade Fegansays
Truth over religious fervour and PC BS
Could it be that everyone here knows your religion better than you do ?
How could you be so foolish ?
jimjfoxsays
Ali, you don’t realise that you are a victim of Islam, as are ALL muslims. Indoctrinated & brain dead as required by your “religion”.
Giacomo Lattasays
Such as yours.
gravenimagesays
*Of course* Ismail Ali hates freedom of speech–especially when it honestly exposes the horrors of Islam.
Martinsays
SEPTEMBER 06 2020 – Pakistan: Thousands rally against reprinting of Charlie Hebdo Prophet Muhammad cartoons in Peshawar
[…]to condemn French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo for the republishing of cartoons mocking Prophet Muhammad earlier this week.
JI leaders were seen addressing a “‘Finality of Prophethood” rally at Peshawar’s historical Khyber Bazar.
“We must find the reason why the honour of our kind prophet and his companions is being attacked,” said JI leader Siraj ul Haq while addressing protesters.
An earlier Jihadwatch article also mentioned that Pamela Geller draw a picture of Muhammad cartoon contest on May 3, 2015 which incited to jihad minded Muslims to drive to Garland, Texas with the intention to kill the “disbelievers” who insulted the prophet and founder of Islam. Still the main topic of that article subject is January 15,2015 Islamic terror attack-n Paris,France when two brothers who were devote jihad -minded Muslims actually carried succeeded in their murderous massacre because they felt that their prophet was disrespected of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
In both cases in Garland and Paris it’s seen that those Muslims took up firearms in defense of their prophet because, it’s very obvious , the god of that prophet ,Muhammad, the god of Islam,Allah, ,must be a weak powerless god, ,even a nothing god ., For this Allah needs Muslims to act violence for him because he is such a weak god that he needs his followers to help him out in striking down dead “disbelievers.”
In great contrast the God of the Bible doesn’t need the “help’” of Christians if someone makes a cartoon drawing making fun of Jesus. This is because the God of Christianity is able to handle a situation of disrespect to Jesus by Himself .
As the Bible informs its reader “Do not be deceived , God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.” Galatians 6:7. [N.K.J.V.]
Otissays
I think satire can help reveal too much rot in Islam.The way Muslims handle criticism should at least wake up those still day dreaming that Islam is just a religion like others to wake up from their slumber.
FYIsays
Satire is a very,very, powerful tool and religions should not be exempted.
Of course islam tries to use the threat of violence and bullying,in the mistaken belief that will stop satire but it won’t.There should be more of it.
muslims complain about cartoons ridiculing muhammed but what about muhammed flying about the clouds on Buraq,his winged flying donkey with a woman’s face?
Like,THAT wouldn’t ridicule muhammed?
Flying from mecca to Jerusalem{c 769+ miles} on an imaginary flying donkey{koran 17.1}
If he didn’t travel via buraq then how else did he get there?
The islamic ‘scholars’ don’t know how to answer that:it all depends on whether or not you believe a flying winged donkey with a woman’s face could exist:many muslims believe buraq is real.But is obviously fabricated and we know muhammed like to fabricate things like the fact he was.. a prophet
“I have fabricated things against God and imputed to him things he has not said”
Al tabari 6:111
{If you are going to make up being a prophet then how much easier is it to make up a flying donkey?}
Other religions can cope with it.
mormons were pretty Ok with the musical ‘the Book of Mormon’
If musicals came back…
“504 houris for 7 Jihadi Brothers”..”the Life of Brian Muhammed”{the story of Brian,who accidently converts to islam after mistakenly thinking it was a religion of peace as the dawah folk had told him}
gravenimagesays
Yes–satire is a *very* important tool.
Otissays
The way one handles criticism and tense moments can reveal alot about the personality of that individual. Islamic adherents have shown how weak emotionally they’re.If Islam is true let it defend itself from the scriptural sources.It’s so dangerous to protest on behalf of something that is indefensible.
gravenimagesays
Spot on, Otis.
Vipekasays
Islam is a rotten thing. You get angry because humamed is put in pictures… don’t judge. If you really believe in God than violence…..God will take care of it…..
Agostino Armo Pellegrinisays
I’m just an American. I don’t think there’s anything in particular that is unusual or out of the ordinary about what I do. I’m working in the defense of the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, the idea of equality and rights of all people before the law…~ Robert Spencer
I had to laugh at your humility, Mr. Spencer. There’s nothing ordinary about what you do, Sir, you are educating about a life and death issue, your work is a bulwark against a dangerous ideology that provokes mass murder and suffering. How many people can say they do as much? You are like a one man army, Spencer, with your books, your lectures, your YT channel, and JW, they’re all a godsend for those who care about islamic JIHAD and the dangers it brings. People like you and David are far and few between. You are both true heroes against the evils of islam in a world of cowards, and the fact that you’re so humble about all that makes you just that more likeable.
It’s insane because you’d think of all issues that everyone could just be united on, hey, let’s not be violently subjugated… we do not want to be forced to adhere to the commands of an illiterate 7th century caravan robber.~David Wood
David’s wit and style has always appealed to me, with his brilliant lucidity, his moral underpinning, and the fact that he substantiates his claims with facts and sound reasoning. In short, he’s smart. He’s what I’d like to be if I had a brain, lol. I felt inspired the first video I watched of him and I’ve never stopped being inspired. He’s one of the chosen ones whose job is to save lives through education and to make the world a better place. The testimonies of those who thank him are good examples of what I’m talking about. He’s like Spencer in that they’re both in the trenches telling the hard truths that transforms lives. They’re the ones taking the hits and insults, living with the added danger of speaking the truth about islam. If that’s being “ordinary” then I’d like to know their concept of “extraordinary.”
I’ve never said “I love you” to any other man in my life, not even my father. But I love both of you guys for what you stand for and the work you do. If a good god truly exists then I hope he blesses you both with the courage and good fortune to continue on.
Thanks X’s a million! 🙂
gravenimagesays
Hear, hear, Agostino!
OLD GUYsays
Islam seems to have a problem with defending its violent reaction to simple questions about the prophet Muhammad and many of the questionable sharia laws that are less than humane.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Ade Fegan says
Thank you gentlemen
mortimer says
The ‘mighty’ Robert Spencer and David Wood have exposed something that EVERYONE should hear: THESE ARE VERY BAD TIMES FOR ISLAM. The Koran is being exposed as a hoax and people are seeing that the CARTOON ISSUE is not going away, because it is a SYSTEMIC PROBLEM WITHIN SHARIA LAW.
The MURDER of BLASPHEMERS IS MANDATED BY SHARIA. Sharia cannot be changed or modernized.
A theoretical freedom of speech is USELESS if it is not actually used.
Nakul jana says
In the recent research revelation of total things related to isam as hoax ie Quran, Mohammad, Islam, Hadith, Sunna, Sira, Macca any cartoons of Muhammad is nothing more than a joke . Let the Muslim get their faith corrected and abandon the cooked framework of religion first before talking anything about islam. These ignorant people have no faith which is the base of their faith ie deception
mortimer says
Re Charlie Hebdo…the right to blaspheme includes defending its practice – Jonathan Chait
1) On the one hand, religious extremists should not threaten people who offend their beliefs. But 2) on the other hand, nobody should offend their beliefs. (So), the right to blasphemy should exist but only in theory. (Liberals) do not believe religious extremists should be able to impose censorship by issuing threats, but given the existence of those threats, the rest of us should have the good sense not to risk triggering them.
The line separating these two positions is perilously thin. The Muslim radical argues that the ban on blasphemy is morally right and should be followed; the Western liberal insists it is morally wrong, but should be followed. Theoretical distinctions aside, both positions yield an identical outcome.
The right to blaspheme religion is one of the most elemental exercises of political liberalism. One cannot defend the right without defending the practice.
– Jonathan Chait, Daily Intelligencer, January 7, 2015
Ismail Ali says
But the empty container like Robert Spencer didn’t understand this fact . He derives pleasure in faking Islamic doctrines.. I don’t really know his mission, till recently when I got to know that he has a psychiatric problem.. From his past drug intakes ..
CogitoErgoSum says
Which Islamic doctrines do you say that Robert Spencer has faked?
FYI says
Speaking of an ’empty container'{which could be used to describe an islamic ‘scholar’,apologist or troll},given that the islamic ‘holy’ book has recently become Holey{what with all the HOLES in the standard narrative}it seems an apposite visual metaphor for the koran is a ..colander[sieve].
The holey koran’s knowledge holds true as effectively as a colander holds water.
Sam says
Just the use of the term “jihad” is a nonsensical false use because it’s used to promote islamophobia,
I have asked a question, but no answer yet, so, here is my question again and again….
What’s the meaning and/or the definition of the Arabic”term” JIHAD in English? Please be as clear and as easy as you can, and if I may, let me repeat another question that I asked but no answer was given to me, here it is:-
Who are the biblical MEN OF RENOWN ?what happened to them and where are they now?
Thanks.
gravenimage says
The idea that it is Robert Spencer who invented the term Jihad is absurd. Pious Muslims have been waging violent Jihad against unbelievers for 1400 years now.
As for the rest, “Sam” has claimed that all Jewish prophets are bad people–something that not even Islam claims. Doesn’t he know that his own coreligionists would violently target him for this?
And “Sam” claimed that he couldn’t properly make clear his love for Hitler, and that he would be explaining it all but had somehow been held back by using a phone. Still waiting…
Ade Fegan says
Go do some fact checking and go sit on the naughty step Ismael
(or quit with the taqqiya)
You may actually be saying is that Islamic doctrines
are big time bad and you don’t like them !
Sam says
Taqqya is just a politeness way of debating, nothing to hide or to lie about, just debate polite management… start to learn more so you won’t stay as stupid and as hateful as you are<<<< I'm not a Muslim, so I m not using taqqya, so I call you whatever I feel you are, this is ok sometimes, not good sometimes ?
gravenimage says
Taqiyya is lying about Islam, to lull the Infidels into a false sense of security while Muslims plot violent Jihad. Characterizing lying as “a politeness way of debating” is just grotesque.
And “Sam’s” constant claims that he is not Muslim–while now whitewashing Taqiyya–makes this less plausible all the time.
Lynette says
But you have been brainwashed all your life into believing all the b/s. Why not say what islamic doctrines he has faked? Remember you believe the islamic “right” of deceit, liars and more of the same ilk. You are the one with a Problem, a HUGE PROBLEM!!
gravenimage says
Ismail Ali, like all pious Muslims, has no understanding of freedom of speech.
Petter says
+1
mortimer says
Heckler’s Veto Definition: -“A heckler’s veto is an IMPERMISSIBLE content-based RESTRICTION on speech where the speech is prohibited due to an ANTICIPATED DISORDERLY or VIOLENT reaction of the audience.” – Justice Dolores Sloviter
-The ‘heckler’s veto’ is nothing but vigilante law or the law of a mob. No group attempting to administer a self-made law which vetoes the freedom of expression of others should be tolerated. The heckler’s veto is a crime against the majesty of the law which is the supreme dominant authority controlling the conduct of everyone, however exalted or high his power. The heckler’s veto is an attempt to overthrow free speech which is the law of the land, and in its place to set up mob law, lynch law, and to substitute lawlessness for the law enforcement which obtains in civilized countries.
– Heckler’s Veto Definition: A controversial legal position taken by law enforcement officers based on an alleged right to restrict freedom of speech where such expression may create disorder or provoke violence.
-Heckler’s Veto Defined as Verbal Terrorism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler%27s_veto
Michigan State University professor of political science William B. Allen has used the phrase “VERBAL TERRORISM” to refer to the same phenomenon (HECKLER’S VETO), defining it as…
… “calculated assault characterized by loud side-conversations, shouted interruptions, JABBERED FALSE FACTS, THREATS and PERSONAL INSULTS”
– Danny Ayalon has suggested that the tactic of ‘heckler’s veto’ be combated by videotaping the shouters.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/offensive-speech-and-the-danger-of-granting-the-hecklers-veto/262434/
gravenimage says
Viva free speech!
Ismail Ali says
Free speech full of lies and hatreds from the. Pit of hell.
revereridesagain says
Keep proving us right, Ali, keep proving us right. You are lunatics in thrall to an irrational, intolerant, hostile, violent fantasy and reality is your most feared and hated enemy.
CogitoErgoSum says
It is true that sometimes free speech does contain lies and hate but, on the other hand, the best way to expose those lies and hate is through free speech for everyone and not just for some. Without freedom of speech for every human being the lies and hate of the tyrant go unexposed and unchallenged so that enslavement of both the body and mind of the many by the few becomes the rule of law upon the planet. My opinion is that God’s intention is for men to live as equals who may speak freely among themselves with their only fear being of not speaking the truth.
Separating lies from the truth requires freedom of speech as the success of the greatest of lies depends upon the failure of those who know the truth to speak out because they fear that speaking the truth will cost them much suffering and pain. Since God is Truth those who fear freedom of speech and that the truth will not ultimately overcome all lies demonstrate a lack of faith in the goodness of God. To be sure, freedom of speech is something that is not allowed in the dark pit of Hell … nor in Islam.
CogitoErgoSum says
And as Monty Python used to say, now for something completely different:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6YTtS9klHQ
I still love watching YouTube.
Lavéritétriomphera says
@Ismail Ali,
(?)
Do not aim for the wrong target, and expose the lies.
Ade Fegan says
Truth over religious fervour and PC BS
Could it be that everyone here knows your religion better than you do ?
How could you be so foolish ?
jimjfox says
Ali, you don’t realise that you are a victim of Islam, as are ALL muslims. Indoctrinated & brain dead as required by your “religion”.
Giacomo Latta says
Such as yours.
gravenimage says
*Of course* Ismail Ali hates freedom of speech–especially when it honestly exposes the horrors of Islam.
Martin says
SEPTEMBER 06 2020 – Pakistan: Thousands rally against reprinting of Charlie Hebdo Prophet Muhammad cartoons in Peshawar
[…]to condemn French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo for the republishing of cartoons mocking Prophet Muhammad earlier this week.
JI leaders were seen addressing a “‘Finality of Prophethood” rally at Peshawar’s historical Khyber Bazar.
“We must find the reason why the honour of our kind prophet and his companions is being attacked,” said JI leader Siraj ul Haq while addressing protesters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuxlFCIHWsk
Martin says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulhF5GBb1vA
Martin says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIYHsLJS-So
Walter Sieruk says
An earlier Jihadwatch article also mentioned that Pamela Geller draw a picture of Muhammad cartoon contest on May 3, 2015 which incited to jihad minded Muslims to drive to Garland, Texas with the intention to kill the “disbelievers” who insulted the prophet and founder of Islam. Still the main topic of that article subject is January 15,2015 Islamic terror attack-n Paris,France when two brothers who were devote jihad -minded Muslims actually carried succeeded in their murderous massacre because they felt that their prophet was disrespected of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
In both cases in Garland and Paris it’s seen that those Muslims took up firearms in defense of their prophet because, it’s very obvious , the god of that prophet ,Muhammad, the god of Islam,Allah, ,must be a weak powerless god, ,even a nothing god ., For this Allah needs Muslims to act violence for him because he is such a weak god that he needs his followers to help him out in striking down dead “disbelievers.”
In great contrast the God of the Bible doesn’t need the “help’” of Christians if someone makes a cartoon drawing making fun of Jesus. This is because the God of Christianity is able to handle a situation of disrespect to Jesus by Himself .
As the Bible informs its reader “Do not be deceived , God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.” Galatians 6:7. [N.K.J.V.]
Otis says
I think satire can help reveal too much rot in Islam.The way Muslims handle criticism should at least wake up those still day dreaming that Islam is just a religion like others to wake up from their slumber.
FYI says
Satire is a very,very, powerful tool and religions should not be exempted.
Of course islam tries to use the threat of violence and bullying,in the mistaken belief that will stop satire but it won’t.There should be more of it.
muslims complain about cartoons ridiculing muhammed but what about muhammed flying about the clouds on Buraq,his winged flying donkey with a woman’s face?
Like,THAT wouldn’t ridicule muhammed?
Flying from mecca to Jerusalem{c 769+ miles} on an imaginary flying donkey{koran 17.1}
If he didn’t travel via buraq then how else did he get there?
The islamic ‘scholars’ don’t know how to answer that:it all depends on whether or not you believe a flying winged donkey with a woman’s face could exist:many muslims believe buraq is real.But is obviously fabricated and we know muhammed like to fabricate things like the fact he was.. a prophet
“I have fabricated things against God and imputed to him things he has not said”
Al tabari 6:111
{If you are going to make up being a prophet then how much easier is it to make up a flying donkey?}
Other religions can cope with it.
mormons were pretty Ok with the musical ‘the Book of Mormon’
If musicals came back…
“504 houris for 7 Jihadi Brothers”..”the Life of Brian Muhammed”{the story of Brian,who accidently converts to islam after mistakenly thinking it was a religion of peace as the dawah folk had told him}
gravenimage says
Yes–satire is a *very* important tool.
Otis says
The way one handles criticism and tense moments can reveal alot about the personality of that individual. Islamic adherents have shown how weak emotionally they’re.If Islam is true let it defend itself from the scriptural sources.It’s so dangerous to protest on behalf of something that is indefensible.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Otis.
Vipeka says
Islam is a rotten thing. You get angry because humamed is put in pictures… don’t judge. If you really believe in God than violence…..God will take care of it…..
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
I’m just an American. I don’t think there’s anything in particular that is unusual or out of the ordinary about what I do. I’m working in the defense of the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, the idea of equality and rights of all people before the law…~ Robert Spencer
I had to laugh at your humility, Mr. Spencer. There’s nothing ordinary about what you do, Sir, you are educating about a life and death issue, your work is a bulwark against a dangerous ideology that provokes mass murder and suffering. How many people can say they do as much? You are like a one man army, Spencer, with your books, your lectures, your YT channel, and JW, they’re all a godsend for those who care about islamic JIHAD and the dangers it brings. People like you and David are far and few between. You are both true heroes against the evils of islam in a world of cowards, and the fact that you’re so humble about all that makes you just that more likeable.
It’s insane because you’d think of all issues that everyone could just be united on, hey, let’s not be violently subjugated… we do not want to be forced to adhere to the commands of an illiterate 7th century caravan robber.~David Wood
David’s wit and style has always appealed to me, with his brilliant lucidity, his moral underpinning, and the fact that he substantiates his claims with facts and sound reasoning. In short, he’s smart. He’s what I’d like to be if I had a brain, lol. I felt inspired the first video I watched of him and I’ve never stopped being inspired. He’s one of the chosen ones whose job is to save lives through education and to make the world a better place. The testimonies of those who thank him are good examples of what I’m talking about. He’s like Spencer in that they’re both in the trenches telling the hard truths that transforms lives. They’re the ones taking the hits and insults, living with the added danger of speaking the truth about islam. If that’s being “ordinary” then I’d like to know their concept of “extraordinary.”
I’ve never said “I love you” to any other man in my life, not even my father. But I love both of you guys for what you stand for and the work you do. If a good god truly exists then I hope he blesses you both with the courage and good fortune to continue on.
Thanks X’s a million! 🙂
gravenimage says
Hear, hear, Agostino!
OLD GUY says
Islam seems to have a problem with defending its violent reaction to simple questions about the prophet Muhammad and many of the questionable sharia laws that are less than humane.