Remember, in light of Humza Yousaf’s words, that Muslim groups and their Leftist allies have for over two decades now insisted repeatedly that any honest analysis of how Islamic jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify jihad violence and make recruits among peaceful Muslims is “stirring up hatred.” So he is essentially calling for the criminalization even of private conversations that appear to be critical of Islam. If he isn’t roundly criticized and removed from office, it will be another sign of Britain’s imminent demise as a free society.
And remember: most people today carry around a surveillance device with them at all times: a cell phone. Tracking dinner table conversations would be easy.
“Hate crime bill: Hate talk in homes ‘must be prosecuted,’” by Mark McLaughlin, The Times, October 28 2020 (thanks to Eugene Volokh):
Conversations over the dinner table that incite hatred must be prosecuted under Scotland’s hate crime law, the justice secretary has said.
Journalists and theatre directors should also face the courts if their work is deemed to deliberately stoke up prejudice, Humza Yousaf [the Secretary for Justice for Scotland] said.
The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill … will introduce an offence of stirring-up of hatred against people with protected characteristics, including disability, sexual orientation and age….
Mr Yousaf … told the Scottish parliament’s justice committee that children, family and house guests must be protected from hate speech…. “Are we comfortable giving a defence to somebody whose behaviour is threatening or abusive which is intentionally stirring up hatred against, for example, Muslims? Are we saying that that is justified because that is in the home? … If your intention was to stir up hatred against Jews … then I think that deserves criminal sanction.”…
Ecosse1314 says
Maybe he would be more at home with Imran Khan. Maybe he should ask children to inform on their parents. Now when have we heard this before
Stanton Lore says
I think likewise. A recipe for certain disaster.
mortimer says
Yes, send Humza Yousaf Pakistan. Scots should pledge to contribute for his permanent move to Pakistan.
Scotland is submitting to Islamic supremacism. Dump Humza Yousaf before he causes more division.
Jayell says
You have to ask why the likes of Yousaf are in Scotland anyway, let alone doing the job of ‘Justice Secretary’ when he clearly has little or nothing in common with the Scottish people, Scottish history or Scottish culture. To put it bluntly, Yousaf’s behaviour here looks exactly like the sort of thing one would have expected from the kind of commissioner that the Berlin authorities would have installed around the UK to control the behaviour of local populations after a successful Nazi invasion in the 1940’s. In that situation, a Berlin-appointed commissioner would have decreed social surveillance measures to detect evidence of anti-Nazi or ‘nationalist’ sentiment and activity, then deal with ‘offenders’ through ‘persuasion’, ‘re-education’ or (in extreme cases) otherwise disposing of them.
This sort of thing has already been going on in places like Hong Kong (courtesy of the Beijing authorities), but, sadly for UK readers, it’s also been happening to a limited extent nearer to home (a) in London where ‘Mayor’ Khan has set up a special unit of the Met Police to trawl the internet for ‘hate speech’ (i.e., usually anti-islamic dissident activity in this case) and initiate prosecution, and (b) elsewhere in the UK where expression of ‘unacceptable’ views has resulted in loss of employment (e.g., Dr. David Starkey, to name just one) or court proceedings, usually under the dubious application of race relations/equality legislation or (c) in the MSM, through suppression of inconvenient news or diversionary tactics like the clearly-officially-contrived celebrity-character-assassination campaigns to bury news of the now-infamous grooming gangs.
Quite who is behind all this and for whose benefit it’s going on has obviously been kept unclear, but one clue seems to be in the identity of certain ‘unlikely’ characters who have reached high office in the UK. The Third Reich would have been proud of all this, as are no doubt the supporters of a very similar ‘religion’.
LB says
Agreed. I like Scots, they strike me as no-bullshit type of people. But for all their boasting and mocking the English for what’s happening to them, the Scots are in the same boat when it comes to appeasing muslims and bowing down to islam. Just the other week there was this talk about how a notorious Pakistani muslim drug dealer and criminal from Glasgow (forgot his name) is the UK’s George Floyd and was turned into a martyr. Not to mention that Scotland is not without its fair share of muslim pedo rape gangs. So much for Scottish pride…
mortimer says
The Scots are having an epidemic of political correctness while at the same time demanding independence to protect their unique culture.
You can’t have both. Pick one.
Humza Yousaf wants to destroy the uniqueness of Scotland.
Oldschool says
Someone should tack an amendment on his little diktat including anything negative or in any way slighting of “wites”. I’ve heard this insane Muslim basket case in Parliament deploring the fact that everyone serving in public positions is “wite”. This one – “wite”! That one – “wite”! You’d think this nut lived in Subsaharan Africa, not Scotland. Scottish people are, in general, “wite”, Humza. Get over it. It’s not about color except in your case. No one cares whether you are “wite” or not except you, you silly twit.
Check Burry says
Yea agree, I suggest readers find vids of this guy, & let us have your impressions. I see zero Justice in this proposal of a new Law. A disaster. He is a 1984 reality.
Narayan Kumar says
Put him on the Rogues’ Gallery
maria says
the best would be to deport him and his clan from Scotland. How can Scottish people who are heroic people tolerate muslims and give them position in the government
Ecosse1314 says
Sadly votes votes and more votes in mudslime constituencies.
Del says
The amazingly stupid Scottish voters elected this hater. It is all on them and it is up to them to throw him the hell out of the country. Every word out of his face is hate speech.
Bob Myers says
This attitude by political leaders and people of influence in Europe is prevalent across that continent. It has also subtly crept into the unwritten policy/practice of political leaders in the USA. It is absolute evidence that Satan has established himself as the supreme leader of Europe. Any western civilization that patronizes Islam has been overthrown by the devil. I am no prophet, but if a contingent of right-thinking humans survive in 2040, they will confirm this as the world becomes dominated by the devil-inspired and founded “religion” of Islam. Make no mistake, Satan has chosen to use the power of Islamic absolutism to establish a world theocracy in preparation for the rise of the final antichrist representative…the man of sin…the wicked one…the son of perdition (2Thessalonians 2:1-4).
CogitoErgoSum says
No one should be able to tell a man what he can and cannot do or discuss in his own home. Damn this man and his religion too. His arrogance is a million times more offensive than any cartoon could ever be.
Check Burry says
Ive seen him on progs such as Question Time, very mouthy, and seems to not want to hear one word in opposition to his views, it made me dislike, indeed almost hate him, will there be a knock at my door now, not that Im on Scotia, but down the road apiece by 250 miles. I doubt HIS law was in the snp,s manifesto.
CogitoErgoSum says
Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad) goes into further detail about this in a video he posted on his Akkad Daily channel at BitChute. He makes some good points concerning passing laws that are intended to control human emotion. If hate against certain groups of people is bad wouldn’t a law against hating all people make sense? Humza Yousaf could rightly be described as a maniac — but he wants to make saying that, even in the privacy or your own home, a criminal offense. It’s his way to insure maniacs will gain control over the world. If he gets to define what hate is, I want the right to define what a maniac is.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/P2nk_wvdfSY/
Michael Copeland says
He does not mention conversations in mosques discussing Koran 60:4 “between us and you enmity and hatred forever”, or Anjem Choudary’s assurance “As a muslim I must have hatred for anything non-Islam”.
Will you send police observers to mosques, Mr. Yousaf?
Clarino says
It’s not just the sermons in mosques that are a concern. The prejudice and hatred indoctrinating the children in some – not all – muslim families is toxic. That’s where they learn their hatred of all things non-muslim, and in particular of the jews. I have had a conversation with a young muslim who was ranting about ‘the jews’ – but it turned out he had never actually met anyone Jewish. He had never met anyone palestinian either, but he was very vocal in support of them, because they were his ‘muslim brothers’.
I really have no idea what to do about this sort of thing : it reminds me of the sort of blind sectarian loathing that was (and sometimes stll is) seen in Northern Ireland. Education (not just schooling) is probably critical, but that means also stamping down hard on mosques, masjids and anywhere that covert indoctrination is happening.
And we need to stop the woke nonsense of saying ‘all cultures are ‘valid’. Western culture is infinitely superior to any culture which endorses misogyny, FGM, honour killings and rabid intolerance. We should be calling them out, not pretending they are equal – after all we are happy to condemn Nazism, the KKK and totalitarian communism.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Michael.
JamesC. says
That question answers itself ?????
Mount Zion says
I saw a video clip once from a hidden camera showing a 5 year old muslim girl beeing taught how to answer when asked where Jews came from . The answer was that they came from Pigs and apes , and that , out of the mouth of a 5 year old , so yes we should monitor housholds but only muslim onces.
janicevanguilder says
again I ask: what leverage does islam now have over the rest of the world to get the royal treatment?
CogitoErgoSum says
I would say it’s the threat that they will kill you if you don’t submit to their demands.
Clarino says
And, of course, oil.
Oldschool says
But Scotland HAS its own oil. Who needs these creeps? Oh, I guess it gives the Scots an opportunity to feel down on themselves.
tgusa says
“If your intention was to stir up hatred against Jews … then I think that deserves criminal sanction.”
I agree. He is so dumb he doesn’t realize that the criminal sanction finger is pointing right at him.
Dinner conversations are not stirring up hatred he and his islamic cohorts are doing great job of that by themselves..
t. says
Exactly, tgusa. In his eyes it only works in one direction.
What Muslims say around dinner tables, in their own homes, overtly in their own Muslim countries and almost everywhere else around the world, about Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and every other group that doesn’t belong to them, is not hatred and incitement to violence against all of these people.
In addition, the Quran itself is filled with hatred and incitement to violence against the above mentioned groups, parts of which are recited 5 times a day during Muslim prayers.
Crusades Were Right says
“Humza Yousaf [the Secretary for Justice for Scotland]”
Hm. Now try this:
“Angus McDonald [the Secretary for Justice for Pakistan]”
Or how about:
“Siobhan O’Flanagan [the Secretary for Justice for Saudi Arabia]”?
Or:
“Vladimir Dimitrovitch Dostoevsky [the Secretary for Justice for Somalia]”?
If the Western world was REALLY in favour of “equality” then we should be guffawing at the FIRST item on the list just as much as the other three.
JamesC. says
Nice one !
The Clan McYousaf is not, I believe, known to history. I want Scottish politicians in Scotland. If they speak Gaelic, even better.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaelic_road_signs_in_Scotland
Arabia ==/////== Scotland.
R Russell says
JamesC
Yes this in spite of Gaelic never having been the language of the ‘Lallans’ Scots. (Lowlands)
Humza wants Arabic taught in schools in Bute and suggested Urdu be taught in schools with large numbers of children of Pakistani descent.
Remember Glasgow Muslims caused the Glasgow civil rights lawyer Ammer Anwar, to require police protection. When Ahmaddi Muslim Asad Shah, was murdered by Sunni Tanveer Ahmmed – who travelled all the way from England to Glasgow to kill him, Anwar asked for unity among Muslims and tolerance.
He should have known better, but his life was in danger, to the extent he said he rarely attended the mosque as a result. (If he thought that was going to help, I don’t know where his mind was)
We have seen what has/is happening in France because Macron has stood up to Islam. All countries need to become familiar with the 4 stages of Islamic Conquest.
Lesley says
Doesn’t the Isle of Bute have a mosque? There is no stopping the scum.
Ecosse1314 says
Well some parts must have spoken a form of Gaelic as evidenced by the proliferation of place names in the southe.g Glasgow Clackmannan Dumbarton etc etc
R Russell says
Ecosse
The language spoken earlier was a form of Welsh (common Brittonic) and just like we have Viking place names, so we also have Welsh (Brittonic) names.
Ecosse1314 says
Is thatnot a form of Gaelic ?? Exactly what i said.
Ecosse1314 says
In fact RR what language do you think the Scots spoke when they invaded from Ireland. It wasn’t anglo-saxon and it wasn” brythonic gaelic.
Clarence J. Feinour says
This is a prime example of what Muslims want here in America. They already have it in Europe where anything negative said about Islam gets you a fine or possible jail time. Muslims want to impose Sharia law here in America as it is being practice in many European countries. Loss of our freedom of speech is only a few votes from it being taken away.
Peter WF says
Muslims make “ideal migrants”.
Search “world map average IQ”
Search “world map marry first cousins”
Search “world map corruption”
Search “most persecuted religion”
Search “world map muslims”
Is there any correlation with the last search?
Why are “migrants” so desperately wanted by 1st world pollys?
tgusa says
Definition of migrant; a person who moves regularly in order to find work especially in harvesting crops. Moves regularly. They need to keep moving, regularly.
It is also ridiculously misleading when refugee is used. Refugees are fleeing countries where islamic culture has made life unbearable for people to live. What do refugees want when the get to their new destination? Islamic culture that makes life unbearable for people to live.
Quazgaa says
Next, Humza Yousef will want to know if you and your other half talk dirty while doing the deed:
“Are we saying that that is justified because that is in the home? … I think that deserves criminal sanction.”…
Good thing UK supports freedom of speech in France, otherwise I would have been totally confused..
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
Totally beyond parody, of course. It’s impossible to know where to start mocking these people or anyone who voted for them… or anyone who is comfortable with them being in office.
Why does Scotland (and the whole of Britain) still bother with the pretense of being a non-Islamic country any more? If you’re proposing arresting ANYONE who says anything bad about Islam, you may as well be Pakistan, or the (former) Islamic State, or Iran…
Rufolino says
This is as yet just a proposal, but it’s horrifying enough as it is.
Who in the name of God gave this job to this man ?
The Scottish People are some of the most admirable people on earth. If you have a friend in Scotland count yourself fortunate. This ugly man insults the integrity of Scottish men and women.
Check Burry says
Well they cannot be what they were or the snp would not be repeatedly voted in.
Ecosse1314 says
As elsewhere there are very few alternatives as all alternative parties are islamo-panderers as well.
R Russell says
You don’t understand the SNP. They groom the minorities and when they get one into power they can be assured of the votes of the rest of that minority.
They are repeatedly voted back in because of the freebies they give out. The better paid pay more tax in Scotland than their equivalent in England. It wont end well.
See the Tytler cycle
job says
The SNP has changed drastically since I was a member in the 80’s.
Ecosse1314 says
R Russell ..what do you think the Tories and Labour do?
TheNicheActress says
If you want to hear what muslims really think about us behind closed doors, exmuslims spill the beans about their families, and it’s shocking! https://www.reddit.com/r/exmuslim/
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
“Journalists and theatre directors should also face the courts if their work is deemed to deliberately stoke up prejudice”
What does “prejudice” (i.e. the act of judging or dismissing someone without knowing anything about them) have to do with saying the dark truth about Islam? The fact that you use “grand” sounding words without caring for their meaning, shows Brits to be a misguided bunch of sentimentally minded schoolgirls.
JamesC. says
Note also, that the “deeming” is done by the accuser – that the “offender” may be wholly guiltless of malice towards Islam, and may intend only to be strictly truthful and factual about it, apparently goes for nothing.
As with the odious and tyrannical “hate speech”, no injury of any kind need be committed, or even intended. It need only be perceived, to count as a crime.
“Freedom of speech” ? What is that ?
mgoldberg says
But the examination of the meaning and reality of Jihad should be pursued and discussed in peoples homes, such that the homicidal murdering of non muslims by Jihadists is understood for what it is, and what it represents.
Elee says
Hey Scots, are you ready to fight in the streets for your liberties?
Mustapha crap says
It would appear that Ayatollah Hogmany wants to turn Scotland into his own personal dictatorship along with Wee Krankie herself. He needs to be stopped Scotland is already turning into the worst part of Britain to raise children
gravenimage says
Scotland’s justice secretary: Dinner table conversations ‘stirring up hatred against Muslims’ must be prosecuted
……………….
Scotland wants to prosecute what people say *in the privacy of their own homes*? This is utter insanity.
It is also urging people to turn in their own loved one’s for non-violent speech in their own homes. You know where else had laws like this? Nazi Germany…
tgusa says
That is right and way back then in Imperial Japan if you were a Japanese citizen and insulted the Emperor, the military going on, policies, etc, you would be risking immediate death. And in the Soviet Union, well you know what the consequences of that would be.
tgusa says
And insults were not the thresh hold, questioning or disagreement was all that was needed. China is the modern equivalent.
gravenimage says
Yes–there have been other places crushing freedom of speech.
tgusa says
Yes and sadly many places in today’s world. The list of those places is not good company to be associated with.
terry sullivan says
boris is at it now
Salome says
Here in Oz we had a Human Rights Commissioner who said in a speech ‘unfortunately, people can say what they like at the kitchen table’ but edited it to ‘fortunately’ in the transcript, so that lefties have another reason to attack people who quote her as an example of what a Human Rights Commissioner should not be.
Lu says
Why insanity? Isn’t that fully expected as the future of Britannistan/Scottistan? – Short intermezzo of enlightened Western Civilization is coming to its end. There’s no peaceful solution to these trends, policies and attempts short of complete surrender. That’s the final status of Europe.
Mike. says
There are plenty of verses in the Quran to describe the proper Muslim reaction regarding this matter.
AND TELL My servants that they should speak in the most kindly manner [unto those who do not share their beliefs]: verily, Satan is always ready to stir up discord between men – for, verily, Satan is mans open foe! Your Sustainer is fully aware of what you are [and what you deserve]: if He so wills, he will bestow [His] grace upon you and if He so wills, He will chastise you. Hence, We have not sent thee [unto men, O Prophet,] with the power to determine their fate. (Quran 17:53–54)
These will be given their reward twice over, because they are patient, and repel evil with good, and spend (in charity) out of what We have provided them. And when they hear ill speech, they turn away from it and say, “For us are our deeds, and for you are your deeds. Peace will be upon you; we seek not the ignorant.” (Quran 28:54–55).
“…you shall hear many hurtful things from those to whom revelation was granted before your time, as well as from those who have come to ascribe divinity to other beings beside God. But if you remain patient in adversity and conscious of Him – this, behold, is something to set ones heart upon.” (Quran 3:186)
(Among) the worshiper (“ibadi”) of the Beneficent God are those: Who walk gently on the earth and when addressed by the ignorant ones, their only response is, “Peace be with you.” (Quran 25:63)
NOW, whenever thou meet such as indulge in [blasphemous] talk about Our messages, turn thy back upon them until they begin to talk of other things and if Satan should ever cause thee to forget [thyself], remain not, after recollection, in the company of such evildoing folk, (Quran 6:68)
when you hear people disbelieving and mocking God’s revelations, do not sit with them unless they change the subject (Quran 4:140)
And so We have made for every prophet enemies—devilish humans and jinn—whispering to one another with elegant words of deception. Had it been your Lord’s Will, they would not have done such a thing. So leave them and their deceit, (Quran 6:112)
So, beheading someone is not an option, even not anything close to it. According to Quran 25:61–69, for 3 sins punishment will be double in here after (if not repented or repentance is not accepted) including killing a soul unjustly. But it is undoubtedly hurtful to the Muslim population and they have every right to express their feeling in non-violent ways.
I am putting it in another way to show why is it wrong. IMAGINE a Muslim majority country, where in schools teachers constantly ridicule hindu God and Goddess, in front of minority hindu students (doing such things are prohibited in the Quran 6:108). It is not freedom of speech. It is deliberately planting hatred toward a specific population (by saying thay they follow an evil). I don’t like your mother, it doesn’t mean that I should make naked cartoon of your mother and show it to your friends. There should be a line between freedom of speech and offending other people. These things are not very difficult to understand no matter how much you paint it with the colour of secularism.
Mike. says
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have copied the above post from a website where Muslims and others debate.
gravenimage says
“Mike.” wrote:
There are plenty of verses in the Quran to describe the proper Muslim reaction regarding this matter.
AND TELL My servants that they should speak in the most kindly manner [unto those who do not share their beliefs]: verily, Satan is always ready to stir up discord between men – for, verily, Satan is mans open foe! Your Sustainer is fully aware of what you are [and what you deserve]: if He so wills, he will bestow [His] grace upon you and if He so wills, He will chastise you. Hence, We have not sent thee [unto men, O Prophet,] with the power to determine their fate. (Quran 17:53–54)
…………………………………..
Actually, these verses say *nothing* about speaking kindly to Infidels. This is what they actually say:
And tell My servants to say that which is best. Indeed, Satan induces [dissension] among them. Indeed Satan is ever, to mankind, a clear enemy.
Your Lord is most knowing of you. If He wills, He will have mercy upon you; or if He wills, He will punish you. And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], over them as a manager.
https://quran.com/17/53-63?translations=20
Then, Sura 17:58 threatends Infidels with destruction.
More:
These will be given their reward twice over, because they are patient, and repel evil with good, and spend (in charity) out of what We have provided them. And when they hear ill speech, they turn away from it and say, “For us are our deeds, and for you are your deeds. Peace will be upon you; we seek not the ignorant.” (Quran 28:54–55).
…………………………………..
Actually, Qur’an 28:58 threatens Infidels with destruction.
In Islam “good deeds” include slaughtering unbelievers.
More:
“…you shall hear many hurtful things from those to whom revelation was granted before your time, as well as from those who have come to ascribe divinity to other beings beside God. But if you remain patient in adversity and conscious of Him – this, behold, is something to set ones heart upon.” (Quran 3:186)
…………………………………..
Note that this Mohammedan does not mention that the very next verse threatens Jews and Christians for not converting to Islam.
The rest are simlilar. As for the claim that Qur’an 25:61–69 tells Muslims not to behead unbelievers is *quite* false–they say no such thing. In fact, these verses threaten Christians.
Note that “Mike.” does not cite any of the later Medinan verses, which tell Musims to slay the Infidels wherever they find them–that is Qur’an 9:5. There are scores of similar Suras.
Then, the claim that Muslim schools do no insult and abuse Hindus and other non-Muslims is utterly false. Here is just one story:
“India: Children’s Islamic schoolbooks teach hatred of Hindus, Christians, and other non-Muslims”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/india-childrens-islamic-schoolbooks-teach-hatred-of-hindus-christians-and-other-non-muslims
Teaching children that freedom of speech is important is *much* different–and that murdering people for criticizing any belief is wrong–as Muslims slaughtered cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo Magazine.
And no–no one has a guarantee that they will not be offended. What this Mohammedan is demanding is that we enforce Shari’ah law.
SemiDave says
From ths article we see that the jihadist takeover from within is nearly complete in Scotland!
The tolerance from the Scots for Islam and its muslims has been revealed as foolishness.
Time to take a lesson from others’ mistakes and not repeat them elsewhere.
Wellington says
Dinner table conversations?
Eff him.
JamesC. says
Effing is what his co-religionists seem to live, and die, for.
JamesC. says
if Mohammedanism is such a surpassinglly wonderful religion, why oh why oh why are Muslims so terrified of honest inspection of it by “unbelievers” ?
Christianity can and should be thoroughly scrutinised, so that those who are inclined to join with it can have a good idea of exactly what they are letting themselves in for. It is open to anyone to criticise it on any grounds that commend themselves to them. And that is as it should be. A religion that makes the claims it makes, deserves nothing less.
The aversion of Mahometans to scrutiny and criticism of Islam strongly suggests that, far from being a Divinely-given revelation to a prophet of God, it is really an all too human ideology that was made up in order to indulge the basest animal lusts of its adherents. Their unwillingness to allow criticism of it, is a very strong reason to reject their claims for it.
R Russell says
Christianity has been scrutinised for 2,000 years. There are libraries with the evidence. In fact a very easy one is Cold Case Christianity.
Islam cannot be criticised if you want to keep your head.
Kepha says
Anyone who values First Amendment liberties should vote for Trump and a straight GOP ticket on Tuesday. Uncle Kepha and wife voted early, calves butting their heads against the oak of a deep indigo state, to register our unwillingness to live under a regime such as Yousaf would impose.
Salome says
To make it worse, he’s a member of the Scottish National Party.
R Russell says
Salome! haha. Nicola despises him, he would have nothing to do with the SNP. Nicola gave a wonderful eulogy when asked about Sean Connery’s death today. He was a member of the SNP and lived in the Bahamas!!!
dofaust says
Why is there no freedom of speech in Scotland? …apparently not a first-world country for some time…. I suspect that the rest of the first-world can easily do without whatever Scotland produces. I will be certain to never visit, and to spread the word that its now gone Sharia.
Ecosse1314 says
Firstly we have not gone sharia( well no more than any western country). Secondly this is only a ptoposal which has not even been voted by the Scottish Parliament. Thirdly it is opposed by most Scots.
Good luck in avoiding Scottish products. I assume you will not use the television ,the telephone (arguably)or use penicillin just a few things discovered or invented by Scots.
David M says
What the hell is a “Humza Yousaf” muslim who believes in sharia law doing being allowed to be a Scottish justice secretary anyway? That would be like me going to Pakistan & trying to impose western values on them. It doesn’t fit.
terry sullivan says
snp are fascists–moslems are fascists
Ecosse1314 says
The SNP are extreme left wing. What evidence do you have that they are fascist?
Myron J. Poltroonian says
Why is the Bill of Rights important – again? Hello?
Andrew says
I think this muslim fellow was the one that stood up in Parliament a while ago and complained that everybody in the Scottish Parliament are white… in Scotland… and NOBODY called him out on his bullshit… Go figure.
I was born in Glasgow Scotland, left when I was 17, never lived there again, and that was in 1966.
If I tell a muslim fellow that I believe his religion is very violent and he then attacks me very violently for saying this, is he a good muslim for proving my point…
Prabhakar Shetty says
Hatred by Muslims is stirred up every Friday. Stop the manic FACTOPHOBIA.
Withdraw voting rights, and soon you will not find apologists for rape, gang rape, looting, arson , plunder, murder and ethnic swamping.
If Governments don’t act because of ‘Political CORRECTNESS ‘ and FACTOPHOBIA, the people will be compelled to start using their firearms.
somehistory says
Guess he plans to have the children rat out their parents….like the nazis did in German homes.
This is what happens when someone who does not understand freedom of speech and freedom of thought…like this moslim fool.. is given power to decide the fate of the population…based on his own bias and his own ***hatred.***
The poor people of Scotland…esp the children who will be interrogated concerning what their parents talk about at home.
This reminds me of the Bible Proverb that gives warning about the dangers that can come with speaking…and a “little bird might be listening” and carry your words away to your enemy.
Check Burry says
G Orwell had cameras in homes in his version of 1984, coming soon to a Glen near you McDuff.
gravenimage says
Juat what I was thinking, Somehistory.
somehistory says
I can imagine it now: A couple wishes to talk about the recent terror attacks in France and maybe they are worried about what might happen to them or their kids in school…
Do they talk about it, do they ask their kids if they have seen anything that makes them afraid, do they remain silent and just worry themselves sick…how do they even talk about it with each other except in their own bedroom…making sure no kids are near enough to hear them.and fearing/hoping…not knowing if their spouse is a rat fink.
They won’t be able to discuss the Truth of terrorism, who is terrorizing whom, for fear of being turned in by their family members and being prosecuted.
It’s just another way of keeping the Truth about islam from getting to more people. If they can’t even talk about it with their kids…husband, wife, other family members.
It’s so demonic, so evil words do not cover it any more.
I think I’m gonna’ have to take another break soon. I can only handle so much at one time without a tilting overload…like a pinball machine.
somehistory says
And, he didn’t say anything about the hate that is fomented, spoken of, preyed about…in the moslim barracks.
Jut around the dinner table…in the home…they can’t warn their daughters against dating moslims or warn their sons about getting involved with moslims anywhere at any time.
The filth, deceit,etc., of siam shows just how dirty satan works.
Fred van de Bunt says
This guy is head of the mosques CIIA, the Central Islamite Intelligence Service.
The CIIA is a common semi-official department in many Islam countries, and nowadays also in areas in Western Europe, where big Muslim populations stick together. Do not forget that in many Islam countries the civil registrar also registrars your religion, which is helpful for the righteous tasks the CIIA executes.
Naildriver says
The world has come to this. In the USA Islam, and such preposterous demands that come with it, piggy backed in on the civil rights movement and women realizing their political force.
Is this that prophesy that the ‘meek shall inherit the earth’– only to to be snatched back by Islam?
Thinking people even don’t like violence, particularly here, were such reactions to the monstrosities of Islam are cautioned not to suggest violence; yet free speech, if afforded, will necessarily broach such violent posssibilities from time to time against such people as this Muslim guy in Scotland — just because.
Giacomo Latta says
”Conversations over the dinner table that incite hatred must be prosecuted under Scotland’s hate crime law
”
Just the dinner table? How about mosques and muslim proselytizing on various media?
”If your intention was to stir up hatred against Jews … then I think that deserves criminal sanction”
Ever read the koran or hear any muslim quoting it? Then are you waiting for, gentle ‘sshole?
Larry says
Mr. Yousaf, stuff that bill where the sun don’t shine.
James Lincoln says
“A Biting Satire of SNP Justice Minister Humza Yousaf”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57A7IwSrjPE
job says
I was a member off the SNP in the old days. We would never have entertained a shite-bag like him.
Check Burry says
I can hear the hate in every “white” he utters, well I guess thats a start, he can prosecute himself.
Goofy says
Good that he brought it up. If hate crime can be committed around the dinner table what about prosecuting the source of all the hatred relating to Islam by prosecuting the Koran for the many crimes it instructs it’s devout Muslims to commit?
terry sullivan says
koran instructs ALL moslems
terry sullivan says
he should be charged with sedition–unfortunately boris is not on uk side
OLD GUY says
This sounds exactly like a dictatorship, controlling freedom of speech and mind control. Thats ISLAM total mind control.
If HITLER were still alive he would love this “religious” control over the people.
R Russell says
The SNP wanted to set up a Nazi puppet government in Scotland during WW2
job says
How about protecting the people of Scotland from muslim hate speech?
andrew mckendrick says
What`s the tartan tie he is wearing? Clan Mephistophelean maybe?
tom fitzpatrick says
Humza Yousaf is without any shadow of doubt a soldier of the militant wing of the moslem brotherhood who has since a young age been nurtured to infiltrate politics in Scotland-UK by whatever means possible. He is a close ally of Anas Sarwar, son of a former MP Sarwar Snr who bribed his way into power decades ago and was guilty of every kind of criminal and subversive activity including VAT fraud and heroin importation which is what the entire family fortune was built from.
IanB says
This moslem clown is unlikely to be successful in subjecting the descendents of Braveheart to Sharia blasphemy law. He’s been called out :
See – https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18834930.humza-yousafs-hate-crime-home-bill-deranged—opinon-kevin-mckenna/
His future days in Scottish political life are hopefully few.