My latest in PJ Media:
A Muslim rape gang – yet another – was just charged with 196 counts of rape, sex with a child, trafficking and false imprisonment. But let’s be frank: there are more serious crimes being committed these days in Britain, and the Yorkshire Evening Post has the skinny on some of the most outrageous of them. It seems that the imam at Makkah Mosque in Leeds, Qari Asim MBE (yes, MBE, just like the Beatles), who is also a “government adviser on Islamophobia,” claims that “hate speech” has “left scars” on members of his congregation. Yes, it’s true: The poor lambs have been called rude names on the street. You thought you had it bad.
The Post informs us that “Leeds City Council research shows that Muslim people are more likely to be targeted by religiously-motivated hate crime than any other community in the city.” That hate crime apparently includes not just insults on the street, but on the interwebs as well: “And online abuse can have an equally devastating impact on Muslims in Leeds, Imam Asim said, creating a sense of fear and dividing communities.”
Imam Asim solemnly informed the world that “I have personally experienced online abuse on a regular basis.” Even worse, “Many of my congregation members have experienced anti-Muslim hatred: being called ‘Bin Ladens’, ‘ISIS supporters’, told to ‘go back home’.” The noble Yorkshire Evening Post details the devastation this causes: “Such anti-Muslim abuse has left scars on people and created a sense of fear not only for the victims but also families and friends.”
There is much more. Read the rest here.
nicholas tesdorf says
Keep up the good work you Kuffar Islamophobes.
Jana says
What about their calling non-muslims “apes, pigs, and dogs”!!!
Jayell says
Yeah, well, OK, that’s not really calling them rude names is it, because they are, aren’t they, I mean, it’s what Mohammed says, and he’s a Prophet, and he says the muslims are the best of people so they can do that, can’t they, and you mustn’t upset them cos that’s islamophobia, innit, know what I mean?
RichardL says
I don’t know why he bothers: the UK has long ago adopted sharia. It was a lovely country when I studied there. Now it is a shithole full of dhimmies
James Lincoln says
According to the feature article:
Imam Asim stated “Many of my congregation members have experienced anti-Muslim hatred”…
Is it wrong to hate people devoted to the mafia?
Is it wrong to hate people devoted to the Nazi-ism?
Is it wrong to hate people devoted to islam?
gravenimage says
+1
Michael Copeland says
“As a muslim I must have hatred for anything non-Islam” – Anjem Choudary
“Muslims …must have … enmity and hatred of …kaffirs” – islamqa.com
and more…..
https://gatesofvienna.net/2020/02/islams-agenda-muslims-speak/
gravenimage says
Yes–hatred of non-Muslims and the non-Islamic is a core tenet of Islam. Thanks for the link to your important work, Michael.
Westman says
We should have some sympathy for the many Muslims who were indoctrinated since birth and yet attempt to live a productive and non-violent life with their families.
It was Muhammad who failed them by not abrogating the violent Quranic invectives that were permanent, not just for a period, during his lifetime. Judaism had a similar problem with some Old Testament writings that were later rectified from a tooth-for-a-tooth to “Love you neighbor as yourself” by Jesus. Imagine any Christian nation operating with the Old Testament as its law-giver. Pork, anyone? Mixed fabrics? Wrong crops in the same field?
Islam had a reform, Baha’i, which it rejected. Mainstream Islam is stuck between violence and non-violence, both allowed by the Quran, and an inescapable apartheid against unbelievers.
In effect, Islam says, “we hate you”, to the unbelieving world and then expects no critique. That just isn’t consistent with reality and human nature. You can have your own exclusive Islamic hating club until it wants to rule the world. Then Islam has a problem and can expect the criticism and opposition to be permanent.
Boycott Turkey says
That’s strange most of the hate I see on the inter web is hatred from Muslim Turks Pakistanis advocating and celebrating the recent genocide on Armenians in Artaksh especially in comment sections of Al Jazeera and TRT also they celebrated the beheading of Samuel Pati the French teacher who was beheaded. it is not islamophobia that’s the problem it’s Christophobia from the Koran that’s the real issue also didn’t the ex pagan turned false prophet muhammed called Christians and Jews rude names like pigs and monkeys and say we where the vilest of creatures ?
gravenimage says
Here’s Your Islamophobia: Imam Says His Congregation Has Been Called Rude Names
…………………
Oh, the humanity! sarc/off
Peter WF says
Rude names? Here’s a reality check – search “world map average IQ” and check the results for the muslim countries.
Shambhu Singh says
You mentioned IQ. Let us get into the reasons for the reason. As per Shari’a there is something called ”Taqlid” which basically means you as a Muslim cannot use your ”aql” or reason under the Orinciple of taqlid.Application of Reason is confined to be excersised only by the authorsied Clerics, called Mustahaddi or Mujaddid, or usually designated as Muftis or high clerics authirised to issue “Fatwas”. So these are the worthies operating ev erywhere, not allowing room to any thinkinming Muslim. It has become a partof their mitochondria now. In Islam jihad means inviting people to join Islam and to fight those who do not accept it.so, the issue here is whether a non mslim or even a Muslim accepts this kind of Sharia or not. Naturally, a Muslim will be scared of not accepting lest he be called a blasphmemor, but Jihad has many facets, religious jihad, love jihad, land jihad, cultural jihad and what we now call postmodernism where jihad and leftism converge. Donot want to go any further but hope the writers on this forum take it further as there is a definite left wing tilt there, despite tne two being antagonistic. else you wold not have a Germany getting screwed by the Turks and an England by the Pakis.
gravenimage says
This is all true–Islam rejects reason.
Ade Fegan says
“Moderate peaceful” muslims are complicit and provide a smokescreen for their devout brothers
Both are partners in the same set of problems that always accompanies islam
john smith says
Totally agree with you Ade that the moderates do provide a smokescreen for their devout brothers. The only difference being is the moderates don’t want to kill us, they just want the radicals to kill us, and that’s the only difference.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Ade and John.
Kathleen Walsh says
They violate and rape white children, plying them with drugs and alcohol. And think nothing of it.? And cry over a few names. Let’s hope the gobshites are deported soon as
OLD GUY says
Just tell that imam I have a few more to add and if it makes him and his animalistic islamic followers feel bad so be it. When you act like an animal and preach hate and violence you deserve to be called bad things and should be severely punished both by man and god.
Come on man you can’t really believe that god finds it ok for you to rape children and murder them in his name.
gravenimage says
That’s *exactly* what pious Muslims believe.
Dawn says
Been called rude names ,oh really while some Muslims kill Christians .
tim gallagher says
Muslims quite obviously treat all non-Muslims like shit in any country where they have power. They murder non-Muslims in terrorist attacks, they have their rape gangs in most countries that they are allowed into, and yet, for some bizarre reason that I just can’t understand, they expect that the non-Muslims will like them and treat them with respect and not even upset them by calling them rude names. How dumb would you have to be to treat such nasty people, our enemy, with respect. This Muslim mentality is completely insane. Muslims, if they want to be liked and not called rude names, should either start treating non-Muslims well (which would be unislamic because the koran is full of hate for non-Muslims) or they should pack up and leave the evil religious ideology they belong to and join the better part, the non-Muslim part, of the human race. I can’t believe how this Muslim can whinge about some “rude” words when Muslims, all over the world, continually treat non-Muslims like crap.
Crusades Were Right says
Brits telling Muslims of foreign extraction to “Go home!” … forbidden.
Brits telling Muslims of foreign extraction “Welcome!” … permitted.
If only Brits who welcome Muslim migrants are allowed to express themselves on this issue, then Muslim migrants will be MISLED into believing they are universally welcomed by Brits.
I believe polling shows that in fact MOST Brits oppose migration in general to the UK. Goodness knows what the percentage is who oppose MUSLIM migration!
Is it right to DECEIVE Muslim migrants into believing they universally welcome in the UK when there might well be a huge majority opposed to their admission and residence there?
Crusades Were Right says
In other words, if one is allowed to publicly express a certain opinion on an issue of national concern, then surely, in fairness, one must also be allowed to express the OPPOSING opinion.
Imagine if only ANTI-Brexit folk had been permitted to express themselves in the public arena, but not PRO-Brexit folk. Just not cricket, old chap!
job says
‘Qari Asim MBE’? Is that Muslim Bomb Expert?
infidel says
In any Khafir democracy, observe that these worms are always standing first in line to vote.. with 4 wives and 10 children.. Voting never for any development.. But voting out of hatred of Khaifirs so that they can never come to power.. At the same time, if Khafirs come to power, suck dry to last drop all benefits of the Khaifr Govt.. Once again first in line for that.. but still playing victim card and abusing Khafir leaders.