Ever the victim. In reality, Shamima Begum effectively renounced her citizenship when she joined the Islamic State, an entity that was and is avowedly at war with Britain. Britain owes her nothing. The establishment media in Britain as well as in the U.S., however, has contempt for the people of the country, and is determined to pursue its narrative even to the point of exposing them to genuine threats.
“‘Nonsensical Shamima Begum ruling says if you are brown you are not really British,'” by Anila Baig, Mirror, February 26, 2021:
Wow, just wow. Shamima Begum, the notorious schoolgirl who fled the country at 15 to join IS can’t come back to the UK to face justice.
The Supreme Court has ruled that she cannot set foot on British soil to fight for reinstatement of her passport.
I’m not a hand-wringing liberal who sees the good in everyone, far from it.
Like the majority of people, my knee jerk reaction when I first heard about the runaway schoolgirl was to demand her head.
“She was old enough to know what she was doing, she admitted she wasn’t fazed by decapitated heads in the bin, she makes the rest of us moderate Muslims guilty by association, she is evil through and through.
“Good riddance to bad rubbish.”
But we don’t revoke the citizenship of other criminals, no matter how heinous their atrocities.
We respect the law and try them in court….
terry sullivan says
is she brown?
Jayell says
Yes, sort of.
Hone C Allen says
No she is more white than brown, I am more brown with a tan, than she is, and this is not about ethnicity, it’s about culture, a very vile one at that
David Everitt says
The WW2 traitor Lord Haw Haw was white, and he was awarded the noose.
Crusades Were Right says
[… can’t come back to the UK to face justice]
I thought exile was supposed to BE the bloody justice, Anila!
(In which case she’s getting off extremely lightly! Remember Lord Hawhaw? Seems execution for treason is “white privilege”! lol)
PRCS says
“I thought exile was supposed to BE the bloody justice, Anila!”
Yes.
gravenimage says
Spot on.
william carr says
I have never read the Mirror as I always consider it a trash ‘newspaper’
william carr says
Not only are there ‘brown’ lords sitting the House of Lords (when they choose to turn up)
but also several knights of the realm. You cannot get more British than that.
Those who reject the country which came them safety, free health care and education to join a ‘state’ of murder, rape and massacre and slink away like criminals, whatever their colour, do not deserve to be called British any more.
mortimer says
What determines ‘Britishness’ is loyalty to the monarch, since there are six or seven distinct nationalities in the UK. Britons are united ‘at the top’ through loyalty. Just because you live in UK is no guarantee of Britishness.
gravenimage says
It goes further than that, Mortimer. Being British means embracing civilized British values–being a member of the Islamic State could not be a greater rejection of those values.
David Everitt says
She cannot expect to run with the foxes, or ISIS scumdogs, and afterwards hunt with the hounds. Those that lie down with ISIS scumdogs must expect to get up with fleas.
Makes me laugh, she dresses up for the interviews looking like the regulation muslim black garbage bag with the gun slit and off camera when caught she’s in western garb.
PRCS says
Both the article’s author, Anila Baig, and Dear Ms. Begum are British born Muslims of Pakistani descent.
Their respective skin pigmentations are the typical ‘brown/brownish’ color one generally associates with the British term ‘Asian’.
PRCS says
Both the article’s author, Anila Baig, and Dear Ms. Begum are British born Muslims of Pakistani descent.
Their respective skin pigmentations are the typical ‘brown/brownish’ color one generally associates with the British term ‘Asian’.
citoyen says
Begum was born in England. Her father was from Bangladesh but he has returned to live in Bangladesh where is more “at home”. She dare not turn up in Bangladesh because they have threatened her with the death penalty.
The simplest way she can cause more mayhem in the world is simply to arrive in Britain in a dingy on a moonlit Dover beach . Then what would the authorities do with her? Once arrived in the the UK they simply could not get rid of her.
Perhaps they they could drop her on Skellig Michael in the Irish Sea with occasional visits from Nicola Sturgeon loaded with Poverty Women’s Essentials and the traditional Haggis: a sheep’s stomach sewn up with offal of guts and a Kelpie’s head soaked in third class whisky. Boiled.
Yum. She’d like that.
Gill says
shamima begum is actually Bengali
gravenimage says
She is of Bengali descent, but was born in Britain.
toomanyhobbies says
no if you are a terrorist loving POS then you are not British…
gravenimage says
+1
tgusa says
“if you are brown you are not really British,’” by Anila Baig”
She calls her brown isis.
THX 1138 says
Somehow at this point I have no problem with an all-white Great Britain .
Hey Anila move to Pakistan and make Pakistan great for once and take Shamima with you.
We know you Muslims make everything beautiful and modern everywhere you go. C’mon Muslimas we know you can make Pakistan and Bangladesh great for once!
BlackSabbath says
Please take Sadiq Khan with you Shamima Begum and make Pakistan great again. Have 25 children with him and other jihadis.
gravenimage says
Islam is not a race. I don’t like Jihadists of *any* ethnicity.
Hindu American says
So, what are your thoughts on Britons of Hindu and Sikh heritage? Would they be “included” in your vision of an all-white Great Britain? I have a 66 year old second cousin who was born in London and lives in Wales. He even sounds Welsh. Should he leave?
PRCS says
+1
mortimer says
England and Scotland have established churches, but only a few people need to join them as part of their job description.
libertyORdeath says
Great point. If the counter-jihad devolves into racism then we have already lost.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Hindu American. Most Hindus and Skihs make fine loyal Britons (and Americans).
As always, this is not about race.
Ecosse1314 says
Going by the Daily Mirror comments section the vast majority of their readers disagree strongly with their idiot columnist.
gravenimage says
Good to hear, Ecosse–thanks.
Terry Gain says
If this traitor was white no one would be claiming she has a right to return. The Mirror columnist is racist. And he’s a fool who thinks supporting treason is virtuous.
James Lincoln says
Correct analysis, Terry…
mortimer says
It’s a complicated legal matter. No country wants her. The UK government contended that Begum (though born of Bangladeshi parents in UK) was eligible for citizenship in Bangladesh and was not left stateless.
The Government of Bangladesh, however, stated that Begum does not currently hold Bangladeshi citizenship and would not be allowed to enter the country.
Begum said that she might consider applying for Dutch citizenship. Yago Riedijk, her ISIL husband, was interviewed in a Kurdish detention centre in Syria by the BBC and claimed that he wishes to return to the Netherlands with Begum.
The Dutch government stated that they do not plan to help repatriate him or reunite his family.
Begum probably burned her UK passport and abjured UK citizenship as part of joining ISIS.
gravenimage says
It should not be Britain’s concern if this embrace of Jihad terror has rendered this thug stateless.
PRCS says
Well, the article’s author can’t be a ‘racist’, as only white people can be so labeled–we’re told.
Wellington says
Evil regularly deflects the truth. Evil also often poses as an eternal victim. On the 88th anniversary of the Reichstag fire, which allowed the Nazis to pass the Enabling Act the following month to formally install Hitler’s dictatorship, it is a good day to reflect on the many machinations iniquity engages in to establish its complete control—and yes, all the while posing as a victim.
Mankind as a whole never learns. Some individuals do of course, even a society here and there temporarily does, but mankind as a whole does not. A plethora of examples could be provided validating this sad reality.
For instance, a continuing and horrible authoritarian Chinese regime (so much for the “wisdom of the East” mantra), the rise of the newest totalitarian ideology, i.e., Western Leftism, and, of course, Islam throughout its miserable 1400 years of oppression. Regarding this last “mistake,” Islam perennially seeks victim status as it has continued to crush non-Muslims (and Muslims too) with a zeitgeist which is the antithesis of the zeitgeist of the ancient Greeks and the ancient Jews, the latter two forming the intellectual cornerstones of Western Civilization and which an ever authoritarian China, a Russia which never learns, a Latin America which functions in permanent dysfunctional mode, Western Leftism and Islam also of course, among so many other “mistakes” of man, wish to eradicate once and for all for sundry reasons—none of them good.
Most of the world is both a phony and an error. Start from this premise and so much will begin to make sense. Guaranteed. I for one proceed from this premise and it has never let me down. Never.
john smith says
Excellent post Wellington.
Keith O says
The last time the world was at war, anyone who tore up their passport and joined the enemy were considered traitors and when caught were dealt with accordingly.
This idiot who left the UK to become a mudslime brood mare should be left in the hell she helped to create.
She’s no longer a British citizen so not the problem of the British people.
Jack Holan says
For treason during war on the field of battle summary judgment is all that is needed to hang her. She should feel lucky she doesn’t live during WW2. Many American traitors came back and faced the electric chair. She made her choice in life, live it.
gravenimage says
I cannot find any instances of this, Jack–citations?
Some German sabateurs *were* executed during the war, but this is a different matter.
Jack Holan says
NewsGuard you are beginning to irritate me since you are presenting an opinion not fact. Disappear.
Infidel says
Where are you getting NewsGuard from? I don’t see it even when I use Edge – the crappy Chromium version that MS made
Infidel says
Whenever courts make, or are expected to make, ridiculous rulings that would cost the government tons of cash, it’s they – the courts that should be expected to come out w/ that cash, not the government. That would make them more conscuous of the financial repercussions of their decisions
In this case, the court in question made the right decision. If Anila Baig thinks that Shamima should have been brought back to UK and then tried, she should be the one paying to bring Shamima back and then producing her before the court, and paying for her maintenance until the court came to a decision. Otherwise, it’s fine for the court to say that Shamima has bo right to come back to the UK, and that she should just settle down wherever she is. In fact, since she’s so good at renting out her womb to anyone, why doesn’t she just move to Turkey, marry a Turk (she can claim to them that she’s a descendant of Turkish conquerors of Bangadesh in medieval times) and keep pooping out as many babies as he wants, just like she did for ISIS
Sylvi Clark says
Anila Baig, traditional English name….. I think not …. this in itself speaks volumes.
VictorMc says
Utter rot DM which is why I don’t read your rag.
tim gallagher says
If the UK don’t want to take back this scumbag who chose to go and join in with ISIS, probably in the hope of enjoying carrying out some of the satanic atrocities they were carrying out, then that would be the reason they don’t want to take such an evil creature back, not because of the colour of her skin. What a load of bullshit for this reporter to write and how dumb people would have to be to buy such rubbish. It is Sunday morning here in Australia and I watch the “Outsiders’ program on Sky TV out here. They showed a short clip from TV show in Kuwait where four women (dressed in modern western style, not the islamic type of garb) discussing honour killings. I’m sure people here at Jihad Watch would find it interesting. I thought it might be on youtube so I googled “women on kuwaiti TV show talk about honour killings youtube” and it is there. It says it is from January 31, 2021. It is ashort clip and worth seeing. In my opinion Islam is full of barbaric crap that should no longer exist and this video clip shows some of this garbage. The video was introduced by Rita Panahi, one of the three hosts, who was brought up as a Muslim and lived in Iran for a while as a child, is now an atheist, and as she said, it is alarming to see a young woman, wearing a modern type of T-shirt, expressing primitive, disgusting views. Sorry I can’t upload the clip but I am a complete dinosaur when it comes to technology and probably always will be.
James Lincoln says
Here it is, tim – and thanks for the tip…
The young woman with the modern type of T-shirt states at 1:03
“Some girls deserve to be killed, honestly…”
Her justification is that these girls bring “shame” upon their family.
Apparently, the subsequent “honor killing” is not something to be ashamed of…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3xwXv9IdxI
Terry Gain says
Thanks James
Well at least they are arguing about whether killing is right. This is progress.
tim gallagher says
Thanks, James, for uploading it. I am clueless about such stuff. I remember you put up the video clip from the British TV show “Scot Squad” as well where the police chief kept insulting some other group every time he tried to apologise for having previously offended a group of people, which I found very funny. I suppose the viewers alert the hosts of “Outsiders” to video clips they have seen. As Terry says, at least there are some women there who are saying that honour killings are never justified. They might be able to make a little progress, however, to me, as I said, I find that so much of the content of Islam is disgusting and barbaric and my main response is to think, well, don’t let people who actually believe such evil, backward crap near our countries. The mentality of too many of them is sickening. On the “Outsiders” program, they showed a very short clip but it did seem a bit different, as I’m sure that one of the women said that a father could beat up his daughter if she stepped out of line. Rita Panahi made the point that seeing a woman wearing a shirt (a jumper not a T shirt – my mistake) with a Bugs Bunny face on it and defending honour killing was alarming. I guess I’m very intolerant but I couldn’t even be bothered listening to the whole clip – you know, listening to their bullshit.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that appalling link, James.
One bizarre thing is that both the young women who condone beating and even “Honor Killing” women who “shame” their families are both unveiled, wearing make-up and Western dress, and are sounding off on film for public consumption–in other words, both these women would *themselves* be candidates for “Honor Killing” by many pious Muslims.
James Lincoln says
gravenimage says,
“…both these women would *themselves* be candidates for “Honor Killing” by many pious Muslims.”
Yes, spot-on. No hijabs, etc.
Something like: “On that basis, the way that we are currently presenting ourselves, perhaps we – ourselves – are dishonoring our families.”
I was hoping that a similar question would be asked by one of the women who is in opposition to honor killings, but that may have hit a little too close to home – don’t want to give anybody any ideas…
tim gallagher says
I was thinking that too, gravenimage and James. Wearing the western style clothing probably would put them in the firing line for many Muslims. The main thing that I took from this video though was that you can have a Muslim woman dressed in western clothing (almost a disguise making you think, well, she might have a fairly civilised view of life) but then she believes that honour killings are fine and dandy. Islam produces primitive, evil monsters. I have said before that I have met Muslim women, who, superficially, seem pleasant, though I don’t trust them, but, like the woman in this video, they probably believe in filth like honour killing, etc. I agree with the point you make, john, debating whether murder is OK or not shows the barbarity of Islam. Islam’s evil garbage has to go. I believe that it all should have disappeared ages ago.
gravenimage says
Agreed, James and Tim.
And it is quite correct that a Muslim wearing Western dress is no guarantee of their embracing civilized values.
Note that even those who don’t endorse “Honor Killing” are unable to come up with any real argument as to why Muslims should not be able to murder women who “dishonor” them. I’m sure they realize that there is no Islamic argument against this savagery.
john smith says
Thanks for this james.
How much more evidence do we need to show what islam can do to people.
To even have a debate if murder is acceptable, is just unbelievable.
PRCS says
Islamic law–in theory–applies to every Muslim at all times, everywhere.
That those four unveiled Muslimas are publicly debating whether girls/women who “shame the family” should be killed–despite the commands, demands, and expectations of whomever wrote The Big Book–it’s clear: theory and practice differ.
Given what the Islamist in the light grey sweatshirt has said, it’s not just theory to her.
The problem for us?
We have no sure-fire method of determining if she would be able to leave that “divine” idiocy behind were she ever to immigrate here; as the numerous so-called honor killings that HAVE been carried out by those of her ilk–here–over the years attest.
R Russell says
Playing the race card. The Muslims have such a persecution complex that they will use anything to manipulate to get their own way.
It usually works.
I believe she will eventually be allowed to return. The government will capitulate to the manipulation and there will be huge crowds out to welcome her back.
James Lincoln says
R Russell says,
“The government will capitulate to the manipulation and there will be huge crowds out to welcome her back.”
With signs saying:
“She is not dangerous, she is in danger.”
mortimer says
UK is part of an international treaty on statelessness. They may not have legal wiggle room.
Eleanor says
I love the way she just casually slips into the text that she is muslim, hoping readers wouldn’t notice this very important fact.Of course she is not biased in any way at all. So this “British” muslim woman doesn’t know the difference between war criminals and traitorous criminals, and your ordinary common or garden criminal. No surprises there!
End PC says
“But we don’t revoke the citizenship of other criminals”
A stupid statement. She revoked it herself very clearly when she joined the Caliphate of ISIS.
Crusades Were Right says
Also, to what country would burglar John Smith be deported? lol
gravenimage says
+1
Phil Copson says
“….Like the majority of people, my knee jerk reaction when I first heard about the runaway schoolgirl was to demand her head….”
—————————————————————————————————————
Strong case of projection here from jihadi sympathiser Anila Baig: Normal people don’t demand the beheading of their self-declared enemies, Anila – that’s just you and your ISIS mates.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Phil.
E T says
The poor dear girl will be the headline, the poor dear girl. How many people will remember the 50, very young ,Yazidi, sex slaves, the ISIS filthy, monsters decapitated and left their bodies strewn around a town they abandoned. Before they left they paraded a 10 year old, pregnant, nude girl around the town wearing only a, dog collar.
gravenimage says
UK’s Mirror claims decision not to allow ISIS bride to return means ‘if you’re brown you’re not really British’
………………………
What absolute crap. All this means is that if you are a Jihad terrorist who tears up her passport and decamps for the bloody Islamic State that you are not really British. Would Anila Baig claim that you are?
She has whitewashed Jihad terror before, bemoaning not terrorist attacks, but the phantom “backlash” against Muslims–even though this barely exists. She blames supposed Infidel dislike of Muslims for Muslims becoming “more insular” and thus turning to Jihad terror–in other words, it is the fault of unbelievers fearing Jihad terror that is responsible for Jihad terror….
No explanation of why Muslims becoming more insular leads to Jihad terror–after all, this does not happen with non-Muslims.
James Lincoln says
gravenimage says,
“…in other words, it is the fault of unbelievers fearing Jihad terror that is responsible for Jihad terror….”
100% accurate – and perfectly stated.
And therein lies the problem…
gravenimage says
Thanks, James.
Christopher Watson Watson says
The writer of the Miror piece is, of course, confusing two completely different crimes: there is a difference between a murder and an act of treason. A murder is when one person kills another for gain, revenge or profit. Treason is when one tries to harm ones own society for reason of religious or political belief. A simple murder may be forgiven if committed for a humane reason i.e. if the victim is terminally ill and wishes to die. But treason cannot be forgiven since it is committed to break the society from the inside. It has always been treated as the ultimate crime. In the past the sentence was death which was repealed in 1998. In England it was repealed by Parliament. The people were not consulted. If the people were given the choice it is highly likely the death penalty for treason would be re-introduced.
Jayell says
After the fall of the Roman Empire, the amalgam of British nations (England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales) was established by a demographic amalgam North European Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Nordic people, and the place grew up in their image without much outside interference from 1066 onwards after the Norman conquest (Normans – ‘north-men’ – were actually the same people with French accents). Therefore, authentic ‘British’ people will be of Anglo-Saxon/Celtic/Nordic heritage. Those who arrived from other places from around the 1950’s onwards purely in order to take advantage of the socio-economic conditions in the UK, and then acquired UK passports, are usually referred to as ‘British’ followed by their correct ethnic identity (e.g., ‘British Asians, etc.) since they do not, and have never had the slightest intention to, conform to authentic ‘British’ cultural values. So Shamima Begum and others like her will always be ‘British Asians’ (i.e., Asian s with British Citizenship rights) and never ‘British’; except, Ms. Begum clearly grossly abused her privileges and is no longer ‘British’ in any respect.
John Forbes says
If this is RIGHT & because SHAMIMA is brown & therfore she is NOT BRITISH why dis she live in Britain & have a British Passport.
This same garbage can be said of the BRITISH children routinely gang raped in the UK! They do not recieve British Police Protection & are therfore not classed as British? This may be true in light of the NAZ SHAH tweets where the children ( refered to as girls – ages 11 to 15 – whom Jacqui Smith in 2008 – sent a MEMO to British Police stating thatGrooming was to be ignored) BECAUSE these girls ( none of whom were or are of the Legal British age of CONSENT ) were & are making “life style choices”! GOOD GOD – how does anyone tolerate POLITICIANS like this???? TWO STANDARDS ALRIGHT!!!
Check Burry says
I would support the courts decision if she had tiger stripes in green and red. There can be no doubt of what she did, she became a traitor, & a terrorist, she openly admits it, a trial is pointless, she is 10000% guilty. I trust this will not now go the the interfering eu court. Who would Im sure allow her back, undermining English Justice, and make her a very comfortable £ award for all the misjustice she has suffered ( not)
Khatt Lambert says
Islam is a wicked, vicious and extremely evil backward ideaology, anyone who thinks it is right and proper to kill others (violently)who do not adhere to their ideaology is a non-human, in my humble opinion…Ms Begum chose, of her own free will, to leave her family here in the UK, to go willingly into a war torn country hoping for some kind of purpose to her life, married a jihadi soldier, therefore becoming an ISIS bride, should never be allowed back into our country.. she has been radicalised and in so doing has become a manipulator of peoples’ feelings, purporting to be a victim of ISIS not a member…well, am sorry to disillusion you but your efforts fall on deaf ears missy…I don’t know of anybody who, in their right mind, would allow you back here to question our right to deprive you of your citizenship…as far as I know about your case, you have access to other countries’ citizenships, due to your parents being Bangladeshis and your husband being dutch…so go take your sorry ass to those countries and request citizenship there…you are not now or ever will be welcome on our shores…
Crusades Were Right says
The Mirror story doesn’t disprove the assertion that “brown” people aren’t British…
… rather it reinforces it by citing Begum as an example of “brown” Britishness! lol
a_white_man says
Muslim Council of Britain, British Muslims in Numbers, a demographic, socio-economic and health profile of muslims in Britain drawing on the 2011 census
‘Ethnic Diversity
The Muslim population is ethnically diverse – 68% Asian (1.83 million of 2.71 million) and 32% non-Asian. 1 in 12 is of White ethnicity (8% of the Muslim population)’
gravenimage says
Yes–Islam is not a race.
a_white_man says
Maybe Ms Fonda could take care of Ms Begum?
gravenimage says
I don’t want her here in the US, either.
Giacomo Latta says
”I’m not a hand-wringing liberal who sees the good in everyone, far from it.”
I guess we work in millimeters.
Crusades Were Right says
Will the Mirror let us know to what country indigenous British criminals should be deported? And why the concern about Begum never returning to the UK anyway? Wouldn’t she be in danger there, given that the place is simply packed with “brown”-hating racists, apparently? She’s much safer in “brown” Syria, surely? lol
Boycott Turkey says
This mirror article is a load of crap about her not being British because she’s not white what about jack Letts who was British white and converted to Islam then joined isis also lost his British citizenship as his mother was Canadian he also was not allowed back in the UK I notice the left are trying to use the racism but islam is a sick ideology not a race infact racism is in Islam.
gravenimage says
+1
Giacomo Latta says
”We respect the law and try them in court….”
We waste our time and other resources to try those who swear that we are their enemy and that we, when we act with great sagacity, reply in kind? I think not.
Michael Copeland says
The texts they recite instruct them to ambush and kill us.
We are their enemy: this is their “Realm of War”.
Commanded to view us with hatred as lower than beasts,
They’re permitted to use deception, and lie to us all.
Disclaiming loyalty here to our state and laws,
Their men conspire to do killings at home and abroad:
They scheme and plan to murder with home-made bombs.
The intention is clear that we walk in fear of our lives.
They are here and round us.
From: https://gatesofvienna.net/2021/02/here-and-round-us/
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
Hindu American: I’ve never witnessed a group of people, be they Hindu, Sikh, or Christian, who integrate as quickly
as do the Indian Americans. Their commitment to education is second to none.
Both my surgeon and my son’s surgeon were both of Indian heritage. My son’s surgeon proudly displayed his service award from the U.S. Military in his office. The children of the new arrivals from India speak perfect English. If you are on the phone with them, you would not know they are first generation Indian Americans. The Attorney General of New Jersey is a Sikh who serves his office with honor and distinction. With that, I do not share the same admiration for Indian American Muslims. I always wonder about their commitment to their new country. Does their American citizenship take a back seat to their Muslim religion? If so, are they traditional Muslims willing to push the Muslim agenda of Sharia law with all of its unjust and inhumane edicts? If history is our teacher, I feel I am justified in my concerns.
James Lincoln says
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness,
I have a good physician friend who is a Hindu American from India. An outstanding physician with an outstanding family. All Trump supporters and 100% integrated into traditional American culture…
Andrew Blackadder says
I asked an African guy if he considered the white people who have lived in Southern Africa for generations if he thought of them as African, he laughed and said, “Of course not, how could they be, they are white”…However “brown people”, who have lived in the UK for a couple of generations are supposed to be called British otherwise we are all racist… but not an African guy… right… Am I missing something here ?.
We should have listened and paid more attention to what Enoch Powell was saying to us all in Britain in 1968 and I for one was too young and stupid to understand just how right he was, and I ask his family to please forgive my ignorance as I was 20 years old and didnt know my arse from a hole in the ground.
somehistory says
“she makes the rest of us moderate Muslims guilty ” from the “article.”
The person writing is a moslum…so what do people expect?
And pretending to believe this begum should have been executed….but then arguing for her return to the country she fought against for islam…is rotten baloney. Lies and attempting to deceive the reader into believing the writer is reasonable…like the reader. In an effort to get the reader to think the same about the “race” issue and how unfair it is not to allow a return.
And claiming to be a “moderate” moslum….there really is no such thing. A moslum is a moslum. If a moslum doesn’t want to be, doesn’t want to kill, see killing, wants the killing stopped, wants the whole entire jihad of islam to end, that one is not a moslum. If a moslum defends islam, spreads islam, lies for islam…that one is moslum and there is no moderate or immoderate about it. since the writer is arguing the “racist” thingy, the writer is trying to advance islam…and is therefore, moslum on a jihad.
One other thing about laws: when a person commits a crime, punishments have been prescribed for that crime…some are sent to prison for “life”…though many of these get out before dying…other crimes merit a few years, months, probation, etc.
The writer is equating the treason, the desire to kill others who call Britain home, the murders, everything the terrorist did with all other crimes where the person is in country, not having discarded citizenship in order to kill fellow humans. The fact that the terrorist knowingly and willingly gave up the “right” to live in the U.K. is thrown out by the writer in order to plead her case, that she should be allowed back in…because she is a moslum.
If the terrorist had been non moslum, had gone to fight for whatever ’cause’ and then wanted to retun, this moslum writer would not be arguing the case, much less, playing the race card.
The U.K. has many Blacks. I have personally heard Black people there, and from there, speaking with the true British accent. But, moslums will use any trick in satan’s book to further the goals of taking over the world for islam. In other words, handing the population of earth over to the devil.
mortimer says
Writer Anila Baig obviously wants to bring back BEHEADING in the UK.
Viktor Smith says
Let us be very clear, UK is one of the least racist countries in the world.
David says
I expect that many would agree with the assertion by the Mirror comment. The UK used to be a white country. There does seem to be a lot of problems with certain racial minorities.
somehistory says
I believe, rather than a “race” being the problem, it’s the ***attitude*** of the individuals.
There have been many Blacks in the U.S. who have spoken out against the bm, the violence and propaganda spewed by that group. I’ve had many Black friends during my lifetime, and they never caused any problems like this. I have Asian friends, European friends, etc. friends of all ethnicities, and have some bi-racial family members, and have not seen these as causing trouble.
There are some racist White people, but the majority of Whites do not agree with that thinking, and although White is not a minority, it is made up of people…and people are people, whatever the color of skin.
In this case, it’s the moslums…of all colors…who are making such huge problems all over the world.. and that proves it is not the color of one’s skin, but the “desire of the heart,” and the attitude of the mind, the thinking, that can make for problems.
gravenimage says
Agreed.
PRCS says
The article’s author, Anila Baig stated:
“she makes the rest of us moderate Muslims guilty by association”
“Moderate Muslims”: Islam’s version of cafeteria Catholics. A club Begum was apparently not a member of.
And, “guilty by association”?
Yes, indeed. Baig, Begum, London Mayor Khan, and a billion+ other Muslims all read the same version of Qur’an–amputations and all.
Goofy says
Why is the west on the defensive? Nobody can be left stateless etc. All civilized countries should have legislation to the effect that citizens joining wars not authorized by their governments should face treason charges, and capital punishment should indeed be a possibility. We all know about the horrendous things which have happened in Syria and an international initiative should be taken to set up a war crimes tribunal to try all the camp inmates. The cases would give us a clear picture of the extent of the crimes and the motivation behind them, i.e. the Koranic commands.
Red Bee says
Hurray for the UK!
But this is a cynical remark. The UK succumbed to mob rule with this ruling in the Shamima Begum case. & Mob rule is the hallmark of islam.
We, the freedom loving and civilized people, have decided upon principles and have made laws according to these principles. We decided the underaged cannot be held 100% responsible for their deeds.
Shamima Begum should be brought back to the UK but spineless cowards failed to do their duty.
The enemy, Anila Baig in this case, ofcourse immediately cashes in. Skin colour has nothing to do with it, but let’s face it; if Shamima Begum had been a white non-muslim underaged girl that had been abused and converted to islam, people would sympathyze with the victim of an evil cult. Drop the “white”, “non-muslim” and “converted to islam” & tell me what is the difference? “Abused”? nah, you’ll have to do better than that.
gravenimage says
Why should she be brought back to threaten Britons? She rejected her British citizenship when she tore up her passport and joined the Islamic State.
And no–white Jihadists have also been prevented from returning to Britain.
gregbeetham says
Because she is brown is the real reason why she isn’t allowed back into the UK according to Anila Baig and not because she renounced citizenship and tossed her passport away and then married an ISIS terrorist in Syria and joined the Caliphate, nope that has nothing to do with it, it’s because she’s a victim of racial discrimination, keep up the great journalism Anila Baig.
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
How could she still be brown after bathing in so much blood?
Sure it’s “because of being brown” rather than because she’s an insane murderous witch.
Jeezus CHRIST. It just shows how UTTERLY mind-numbing it is to live in Britain. People here have an average IQ of about 5.
Harry Again says
She should be tried where she committed her crimes.
They have sharia law there so she’ll be OK with that,
And the death penalty.
Kathleen Walsh says
It’s a pity the victims of jihad and beheadings are not afforded the publicity this evil witch brought upon herself. Karmas a bitch. Let’s hope she gets her just deserts.
PRCS says
If the Islamist in the light grey sweatshirt were to “shame the family” sometime down the road—-would she maintain the same, then?
Dave says
If I used pages from the Daily Mirror to line the bottom of my parrot’s cage, he’d refuse to shit on it.
The paper’s editor, Kevin Maguire, is an IRA and muslim terrorist-loving idiot.
David says
The Begum bitch is lucky that she has not been threatened with hunging if she returns like the other traitor Lord Haw Haw, another British citizen whom preffered to work for the Natzis.
On the pratical side of things, whats to prevent the public from hounding her for life if permitted to return to the UK, the silly bitch has made her bed, a couple of them by all accounts, so let her lie in it.