“I ask Allah to have mercy on me, my brother, and my family,” Tsarnaev said in 2015. And now he is asking the American judicial system to have mercy on him as well. But what about mercy for those he murdered and maimed? His victims have no chance to appeal the death penalty that he gave to them. Can they countersue? In any case, given Biden’s handlers’ opposition to the death penalty, will their people be at the Court arguing on behalf of the jihadi?
“High Court Could Reimpose Boston Marathon Bomber’s Death Sentence,” Associated Press, March 22, 2021 at 9:52 am ET
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday it will consider reinstating the death sentence for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev…
The justices agreed to hear an appeal filed by the Trump administration…
The case won’t be heard until the fall, and it’s unclear how the new administration will approach Tsarnaev’s case. The initial prosecution and decision to seek a death sentence was made by the Obama administration, in which Biden served as vice president.
But Biden has pledged to seek an end to the federal death penalty.
Walter Sieruk says
On the subject of Capital Punishment those who go outside a protest against the state government using of the death penalty and holding up signs show the words printed on them “Thou shall not kill”, those four words which are the sixth commandment , Exodus 20:13. are taken form the AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION translation of the Bible of the Ten Commandments . By and large the .K.J.V.is a good translation yet not a perfect one. For Jewish and Christian scholar who understand the original Hebrew which the Old Testament , some call it the “Older Testament “, of the Bible which was first written in Hebrew, the point the those scholars will inform all who are willing to listen that the word was “Murder”” and not “Kill” in the original Hebrew of which the First Old Testament was written.
There is a vast different between those two words “Killing “and “murder “, for example a dictionary definition of the word “Murder” is “the unlawful and malicious act of killing another person.” In contrast “Killing is defined as “To put to death or to slay”
So the anti-capital punishment people who quote Exodus 20:13 in the A.K.J. V. might also look up that same specific verse in the NEW KING JAMES VERSION and see how it’s put right by reading “ You shall not murder” For in the very next chapter in Exodus 21:12 it reads “He who strikes man so that he dies shall surely be put to death.”
Further, in the New Testament the Bible reader in Roman 13:1-4 that not only are governmental law enforcement forces are ordained by God to hold back and stop the criminal and wicked activities by evil and dangerous men. This also this may extent to the criminal courts which h included punishment for the evil doer. If the Bible student examines more closely the specific verse number four he or she will discover that the scripture even refers to the government executor as type of minister of God to punish such men.
Be that evil and murderous jihadist marathon bomber , Tasrnaev.
In conclusion the people who use their constitutional right to speak out against capital punishment do and should have the right of freedom of speech and expression to let other know how they feel on the subject of capital punishment. Nevertheless they either don’t know or do know but couldn’t care less that they are misusing the Bible in quoting Exodus 20:13 out of context.
Some of the anti –capital punishment feel might feel real righteous and pious by quoting that single verse out of the whole Bible , still in spite of the “pious emotions” some of them might have ,they are still misusing the Bible.
In addition to all this , the Bible in is written “Whoever kills any man shall surely be put to death.” Leviticus 27:17 [N.K.J.V.]
Walter Sieruk says
I rechecked by Bible and discovered is actually Leviticus 24:17 that reads whoever kills any man shall surely be put to death. ” [N.K.J.V.]
DWAIN SMART says
Go to the greek. It’s murder vs. kill.
Wellington says
Proposition: Not having the death penalty for heinous, premediated murders and mayhem is immoral.
gravenimage says
+1
revereridesagain says
Execute the little b@$tard.
James Lincoln says
Agree, Wellington.
gravenimage says
Supreme Court announces it will consider reinstating death penalty for Boston Marathon jihad murderer
…………
Just heard about this on the news.
Sure hope it happens.
DWAIN SMART says
Oh, c’mon. Let him cash his stimulus check and vote Democrat first.
revereridesagain says
This is what, among other things, the little son of a whore of Allah did:
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/this-woman-is-so-boston-and-so-awesome/
I’d happily drive into town — which is saying a lot considering it’s Boston traffic — to see the little S.O.B. hanged in public on the Common as in the “good old days”.
James Lincoln says
revereridesagain,
I’ll meet you there, with pulled pork sandwiches – and beer!
owensgate says
That unrepentant p.o.s. jihadi is still alive? What a waste of oxygen (and taxpayer money).
DWAIN SMART says
C’mon. Let him vote Democrat first. He’s not even done spending his stimulus check.
sidney penny says
“But Biden has pledged to seek an end to the federal death penalty.”
Any reason given?
Rob says
Best news of the year so far.
gregbeetham says
Get rid of the waste of space, the sooner the better.
SKA says
I am against the death penalty for the Muslim terrorists for two reasons: First, Other nations that have abolished the death penalty will use our death penalty as a pretext not to extradite wanted terrorists to us for us to try and punish them. Under the legal doctrine of Aut Dedere Aut Judicare that means they would have to try them themselves. But we have witnessed how some nations, such as Greece in the 1990s, would try, convict and then grant work release to the terrorists who promptly fled. Or worse let them walk in some technicality. Second, and more important – the self-styled jihadi believes his murderous act if punished by execution results in his shahadat (martyrdom) permitting him instant entry to paradise with his 72 virgins et cetera. But a life sentence means he must suffer a meaningless long wait for his reward and the humiliation of remaining the prisoner of the kuffar. And who knows if in that meanwhile he might not sin through doubt or other weakness putting his instant pass to paradise at risk? Let him face decades of humiliation and doubt rather than the conceit of a quick pass to paradise.
SKA says
And there is always a possibility that in the meantime the convicted terrorist may come to reason and can testify to the futility of the jihadists’ dream and wasted life.
gravenimage says
I don’t think we should have to change our laws for Jihadists.
No Muzzies Here says
It should be obvious that the new administration is not going to pursue the death penalty for this murderer. Biden’s administration is deeply in debt to Muslims and will do nothing at all that would annoy them, even if it means betraying Americans.
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
+1 SKA. I agree. Let him spend the rest of his life in a cage. There are fates worse than death. In the words of the great patriot, Patrick Henry, “Give me liberty or give me death.”
Maemae77 says
I see this page targeted by his supporters to reason away his well deserved doom. This is exactly why we have these pos’s back out into the streets killing again because later on they get pardoned.
Some people need to be stopped and don’t use the Bible to deceive and shame Christians into feeling sorry for this pos. That’s just blatant deception.
Trevor Loughlin says
Appalling as this terrorist is he is not much different to any other deranged spree killer. And the death penalty is an even greater abomination. Europe has can criticise human rights abuses in Islamic nations, but as long as America degrades its prison staff with this terrible duty, which none of them enjoy, it cannot criticise other nations. And it is not as if American prisons are a holiday camp-as pointed out, “martydom” would have been the dignified option. Wailing about the results of letting low IQ mysogynist religious losers into your country and then looking for revenge is closing the stable door after the horse has bolted.
gravenimage says
The death penalty for a mass murderer is worse than mass slaughtering innocent people? How so?
And while *no one* “enjoys” execution, the implication that all prison staff are against the death penalty is quite mistaken.
And the idea that you can say nothing against the horrors of Islam if you have the death penalty for mass murderers is a *very* strange claim.
And we should definitely end the practice of allowing Muslims to flood into the US–that does not mean that the ones who are here should be allowed to murder people.
As for Europe, they seldom use life sentences at all these days–so these Jihadists will be out in a few years to murder again. You may consider this ‘justice’, but sane people do not.
Will says
I have it on good authority that Biden will personally be there to hand him his stimulus check just before they flip the switch