Of course. How else could it have possibly arisen?
Once again: The Jews in the Qur’an are called the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
Original video:
MEMRI excerpt:
“Trinidad And Tobago Islamic Scholar Imran Hosein: COVID-19 Is Not Compatible With The Quran, Hence It Is Biological Warfare By The Zionists, Who Wish To Annihilate The Arabs In The Holy Land,” MEMRI, May 5, 2021:
Imam Imran Hosein, an Islamic scholar from Trinidad and Tobago said that the Zionists manufactured the coronavirus in order to wipe out the Arabs from the Holy Land. He made these remarks in a video that was posted on his official YouTube account on May 5, 2021….
Imran Hosein: “Those who are behind this virus… it’s not from nature, it is from a laboratory. And they are in fact pursuing biological warfare. This could not have come from nature. This is my first point, that it is in conflict with our [inaudible] that the virus could then reach all of mankind at the same time. That’s not possible, from the truth which has come from the Quran. If the virus has come from a laboratory, it’s manufactured, it constitutes, as I said, biological warfare. I have given the analyses many, many times so far in this last one year or so that we’ve been living with the virus, that we can recognize the end game. The end game is located in the holy land. And so this virus has Zionist roots in it.
[…]
“And so I anticipate that they will keep this virus turning, turning, and turning and turning around the world and coming and going until eventually, I don’t know how long from now… until eventually a virus will be released in the holy land, in Israel, which will be the most dangerous virus of all, manufactured in a laboratory. And this is the one which will wipe out the Arabs. Well then, if it’s wiping out the Arabs, well, what about the Jews? You can’t have a virus that will also wipe out the Jews. So in other words, we are looking for a virus that is manufactured, that has DNA specification that will target only Arabs and not target Jews.
[…]
“When the Arabs in the holy land and around the holy land are wiped out, then the Israelis, the Zionists, can say: ‘well, don’t blame us, the virus has been here all along, don’t blame us. This virus is from nature.’ Well, I am telling you from now, you should not be brainwashed, it’s time for you to open your eyes and look and see, and what I am offering to you is I believe, I believe, I believe is credible.”
Elizabeth Lawson says
Yet, another lass A Moslem idiot. Don’t Arab countries have schools?
gravenimage says
Mostly Madrasses–Islamic schools. These do nothing to help matters–just the opposite.
Ecosse1314 says
These people would be so funny if they weren’t so dangerous.
VICTOR COWEN says
er…….NO- yet another fruit today.
It’s boring really
gravenimage says
What is this poster babbling about?
Infidel says
So the Chicoms are Zionists? Interesting that every muslim country has bought into the belt/road scam
Keith O says
Infidel, Yeah, that thought came to mind straight up.
Dem sneaky Zionists have infiltrated everywhere.
tim gallagher says
Yeah, I had that reaction immediately as well, Infidel and Keith O. So now the Chinese are Jews and part of that Zionist conspiracy that is behind everything bad that happens in the world. Could this fuckwit really believe that? Anyone who believes that just has to a Muslim “scholar”. They are the only people who are moronic enough to believe such utter crap. Seriously, anyone with even half a brain would be embarrassed to come out with such drivel.
Peace says
And when you look at how all the countries of the world treat the muslims, really, it’s the chinese that are handling them they best way possible …
JCA Reid says
Didn’t know Chinese Commies were actually Zionists.
mgoldberg says
So another Islamic Imam, and expert, declares Zionists created the Corona virus to destroy arabs in ‘the holy land’. And from that you deep dive into more of your drivelings, about Robert Spencers bona fides??!?
Question: who’s more delusional in this moment- that Imam and his evil soul, or you and your misdirection so as to ignore the evily Imam and his evil projections? Toss up……..
The Political Oracle says
What! Facebook and Twitter hasn’t flagged this Imam as fake news yet! Israel is in trouble and should never allow these two communist SM sites anywhere near their population.
gravenimage says
Good point.
Walter Sieruk says
The Muslim clerics by saying that fool statement has revealed his own ignorance about his religion, Islam, and his god ,Allah.
For by the reading of the teachings of the Quran it’s very obvious Allah is responsible for that starting and continuing the plague of coronavirus
What a cruel and vicious god, Allah is.
For when getting down to basic Quran theology which is the Quran based worldview the one who is really to blame and is responsible for the coronavirus plague is the god of Islam ,Allah. For according to the Quran Allah had sent cruel disaster of coronavirus on human beings
.
This means then the god of Islam, as if he really does is a destructive and malicious god. For the Quran teaches in Surah 57:22. “No misfortune [disaster] can happen on earth or in your souls but is recorded in a decree [Quran ] before [in eternity ] We [Allah] bring it into existence: that is easy for Allah.”
Therefore according the Islam’s “holy book,” the Quran the Islamic god, Allah, is guilty of infecting people with coronavirus What a cruel vicious, malicious god Allah must be. So Allah is than a very unloving malice –filled god.
Nevertheless, all Christians and Jews shout not lose faith and heart in the God of the Bible as vicious by sending coronavirus on people.
This is because the god of Islam is should be made clear that the God of the Bible is not really Allah the god of Islam. To explain, through the passing of time it has become widely accepted that the word “Allah” is just the Arabic word for God.
This started when truth compromising Bible “translators” substituted the word Allah where the word God should have had been uses in the Arabic translation of the Bible. Furthermore, in the glossary in the book ASSASSINS! By Dr. Haha Lung it defines Allah as the “Pre-Islamic Lunar god : the god of Islam. “
Likewise, in the book entitled INSIDE ISLAM by a former Muslim who is now a Christian, Reza by the reading from the Quran it’s very obvious Allah is responsible for that starting and continuing the plague of coronavirus
What a cruel and vicious god, Allah is.
For when getting down to basic Quran theology which is the Quran based worldview the one who is really to blame and is responsible for the coronavirus plague is the god of Islam ,Allah. For according to the Quran Allah had sent cruel disaster of coronavirus on human beings .
This means then the god of Islam, as if he really does is a destructive and malicious god. For the Quran teaches in Surah 57:22. “No misfortune [disaster] can happen on earth or in your souls but is recorded in a decree [Quran ] before [in eternity ] We [Allah] bring it into existence: that is easy for Allah.”
Therefore according the Islam’s “holy book,” the Quran the Islamic god, Allah, is guilty of infecting people with coronavirus What a cruel vicious, malicious god Allah must be. So Allah is than a very unloving malice –filled god.
Nevertheless, all Christians and Jews shout not lose faith and heart in the God of the Bible as vicious by sending coronavirus on people.
This is because the god of Islam is should be made clear that the God of the Bible is not really Allah the god of Islam. To explain, through the passing of time it has become widely accepted that the word “Allah” is just the Arabic word for God. This started when truth compromising Bible “translators” substituted the word Allah where the word God should have had been uses in the Arabic translation of the Bible. Furthermore, in the glossary in the book ASSASSINS! By Dr. Haha Lung it defines Allah as the “Pre-Islamic Lunar god : the god of Islam. “
Likewise, in the book entitled INSIDE ISLAM by a former Muslim who is now a Christian, Reza F. Safa on pages 22, 23 it reads “In pre-Islamic times both Allah –worship and Baal-worship involved the worship of the sun, the moon and the stars which h defines them as astral religions. [Which are condemned in the Bible, Second Kings 23:5] The crescent moon, which was the symbol of moon worship, is also the symbol of Islam.”
Daniel says
Wellington muslims have a personal, spiritual and emotional relationship with thier god…unlike communists or BLM or kkk..infact we muslims don’t like communists or nazis at all because these groups always target muslim. And yeah most Muslims r aware that many people don’t like Islam but doesn’t mean they will abandon thier “faith” yes it’s a faith unlike Communists,blm,nazis which don’t require faith in the creator of the universe. U should come with a better and more humane solution….u can’t just cancel groups u don’t like….it’s called cancel culture and is against freedom of speech and expression.
gravenimage says
Yet more from “Daniel”:
Wellington muslims have a personal, spiritual and emotional relationship with thier (sic) god…unlike communists or BLM or kkk..infact (sic) we muslims don’t like communists or nazis at all because these groups always target muslim (sic).
…………………..
Actually, Muslims, while they generally hate Kafirs, so often make an exception for Hitler, and especially praise the Holocaust. If “Daniel” here actually had a problem with that, then he would take it up with his savage coreligionsts, and not the good Infidels here.
And Hitler admired Islam–he did not target Muslims. This is quite false.
Then, the idea that Muslims violently targeting non-Muslims constitues a “a personal, spiritual and emotional relationship with thier (sic) god” is quite appalling. Moreover, this is not the case–Islam is largely about imposing strictures on the believer–there is really nothing in Islam indicative of a spiritual relationship with the distant and punitive “Allah”.
More:
And yeah most Muslims r (sic) aware that many people don’t like Islam but doesn’t mean they will abandon thier “faith” yes it’s a faith unlike Communists,blm,nazis which don’t require faith in the creator of the universe. U (sic) should come with a better and more humane solution….u (sic) can’t just cancel groups u (sic) don’t like….it’s called cancel culture and is against freedom of speech and expression.
…………………..
Note the implication that if Muslims are not allowed to violently target Infidels that they are not allowed to practice their vicious faith.
Then, it is “Daniel” who had lauded the murder of apostates–the idea that he is chanpioning freedom of speech and expression could not be more perverse.
Really, Infidels just want to be allowed to live free of the horrors of Islam–the idea that such a desire is indictative of ” cancel culture” is quite grotesque.
Wellington says
Your deity, Daniel, does not exist and I would bet my life on this. Allah was Mo’s hand puppet.
There is no Allah, the Koran is a hate manual and the character of Mohammed is that of a brutal, self-serving (e.g., never got a revelation from Allah that went against his sexual desires, whether for Mary the Coptic, his daughter-in-law, Zaynab, et al.) psychopath. The fact that Muslims consider Mohammed the Model Man is itself demonstrative of how sick Islam is to its very core.
But let’s assume Allah does exist and Islam is the true faith. Well then, the sane and noble portion of mankind must then emulate Prometheus defying Zeus and suffer the consequences because, you see, if Allah actually exists and chose a psychopath like Mo as the “last and greatest of the prophets,” then we live in a very creepy universe and God’s a jerk.
You Muslims don’t like Nazism? You lie or you are extremely naive. Hitler is regularly praised in the Islamic world. And Hitler and his Nazi cronies never targeted Muslims. Hitler actually met with the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, who was a Jew hater to the core. We have photographs of this meeting. Moreover, while Hitler despised Christianity, he expressed some admiration for Islam because it was spread by the sword and demonized Jews.
And putting aside that the new term “cancel culture” is an entirely Western Leftist phenomenon, whereby mainstream conservatives (and even often times other Leftists) are stripped of their humanity in their entirety for, mon Dieu, saying or writing something wrong that goes against Leftthink, what I want is Islam accurately described as the spiritual totalitarian ideology which it is. It’s the worst religion ever devised by man and I can respect no one who thinks Allah, Mohammed and the Koran are positives. No they are not. They are gigantic negatives.
And I can’t just cancel groups I don’t like? Putting the verb “cancel” aside, why can I not criticize, mock and deride groups and ideologies like the KKK, Antifa, BLM, Marxism, Nazism, anarchism and, yes, Islam? And how rich it is of you to invoke freedom of speech and expression when the Islamic faith is rooted in the repression of true freedom of speech and expression (e.g., mock Mohammed and many Muslims want to kill you; by contrast, mock Jesus and virtually no Christian wants to kill you).
You are a very confused human being. You have demonstrated this to me and to others. And know this: You and Islam will not prevail because you are at least ignorant (perhaps worse) and Islam is evil. Calling out evil, you know, has nothing to do with cancel culture or repressing freedom. Indeed, freedom cannot survive if evil is not properly and accurately characterized.
For the record, Islam is evil and no other major religion is. Take it from here.
Keith O says
This so called “cleric” is making a fashion statement.
He painted his tin foil hat white.
gravenimage says
More tedious spam from “Daniel Ally”:
My opinion on Robert Spencer :Let’s talk about Robert Spencer. As some of you know, Spencer is a well known so called “expert” of islam and jihad even tho (sic) he has got no formal studies in islam. Robert has been invited by Stanford College Republicans, israel advocacy groups, Christian conservative groups,far right orgs,Far right white nationalists like Geert Wilders etc.
………………………….
Note that “Daniel Ally” says nothing about the story above. Instead, he rants endlessly about anyone who dares oppose the horrors of Jihad and Shari’ah–including this from this vicious lying Muslim cleric.
Robert Spencer has an advanced degree in Religious Studies from a major university–but what those like “Daniel Ally” really mean is that he isn’t a Muslim cleric like the moron in the story above.
As pious Muslims see it, Infidels do not have the right to comment on Islam–especially critically.
And how is Geert Wilders a “white nationalist” for not wanting Jihad and Shari’ah in his civilized nation–from *any* source? Of course, Islam is *not* a race, as has been pointed out to the dishonest “Daniel Ally” several times here.
Then, he condemns Robert Spencer for speaking to conservatives and Christians. He *does* realize that this is the free world? These groups have not been criminalized here as he appears to believe.
More:
This has expectedly led to criticisms from other various groups of people even from conservative commentators like Dinesh D Souza often portraying Spencer as an Islamophobe,musim hater,,anti Muslim,anti arab,anti Palestinian, racist, bigot who twists historical fact for a political agenda. His credentials are, truthfully, less than astounding: his formal area of study is Catholic history and all of his books have been published by fringe publishers and lack academic peer review. However, he has worked with the United States government and military on Islamic issues and has appeared on various news networks. Because of this, I decided to read some of his more recent books for myself.
………………………….
Actually, Robert Spencer’s books have been huge bestsellers–not exactly “fringe” as he dishonestly implies.
Then, how does his having worked with the US government and military make him fringe? Really, “Daniel Ally” here cannot maintain a consistent narrative. No real surprise there.
More:
“Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into into Islam’s Obscure Origins”
Despite the rumors of Spencer’s Islamophobia, I was — daresay, pleasantly — surprised reading this book. Published in 2014, “Did Muhammad Exist?” exams (sic) and challenges the orthodox historiography and the historicity of the prophet. While orthodox historiography argues that the early Muslim conquests of the sixth and seventh centuries were done by a unified Muslim empire, Spencer claims that the theology of Islam only appeared after the conquests and the formation of empire. However, this is essentially all he does: despite the editorialized title, Spencer rarely challenges the actual existence of Muhammad. Furthermore, the actual historical argument is unconvincing, relying on minor documents that merely obscure the conventional narrative instead of disproving it. His claim is simply too large to support with the evidence he supplies. With its editorialized title and unconvincing arguments, the text is simply a weak attempt at a historical analysis.
………………………….
The title of this book *is a question*. Spencer examines the historical evidence. “Daniel Ally” does not appear able to grasp this concept.
More:
“The Truth about Muhammad: The Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion”
If you can’t tell by the title, this book has a far more apparent agenda. Published in 2006, this text has three goals: to show the truth of the prophet’s life and actions, to explain how the prophet’s life influenced the development of Islam, and to advocate for these two discussions to influence our modern relationship with Islam. Like in “Did Muhammad Exist?” Spencer uses certain texts and documents to poke small holes in the orthodox historiography while failing to really reveal anything groundbreaking. Despite the editorialized title (a common trend with his works), this is not a biography of Muhammad. Instead, it’s merely an outline focusing on the more negative and controversial aspects of the prophet’s life without making any new developments in the historiography of Islam. The attempt to discuss America’s current involvement with the Middle East, however, is far more interesting: completely ignoring literally centuries of political, material, and religious developments, Spencer attempts to directly link Muhammad’s life and contemporary Islamic developments to the United States’ relationship with Islam and the Middle East today. This is an obvious example of bad historiography. While the events of the sixth century of course have influence on our modern cultures and politics, to draw a straight line between the two while not even mentioning anything that has happened in between is at best misguided and at worst disingenuous. Furthermore, it is poorly written and quite redundant: Spencer feels the need to repeat himself countless times over the text, perhaps making up for his lack of actual content.
………………………….
This is quite false. The texts of Islam *itself*–as well as mainstream historical evidence–points to the savagery of Islam and its concept of the figure of the “Prophet”.
And this continues to this day–Muslims regularly attack and murder in the name of the vicious “Prophet”.
con’t
gravenimage says
con’t from above
More:
“The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)”
If the previous two books were the entirety of Spencer’s bibliography, I’d be willing to agree that he is simply a bad historian instead of a bad historian with an overwhelming political agenda against Islam. This guide, however, makes it clear where his opinions on Islam lie: Spencer openly claims that Islam is a fundamentally violent religion and that both historic and modern conflicts of the West with Islam are justified responses. Written less like an academic text and more like a manifesto, this 2005 text is an addition to the “Politically Incorrect Guide” (or “P.I.G.”) series which includes gems such as the unapologetically unscientific “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design” and the Neo-Confederate “The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War.” Spencer’s addition fits in perfectly with this motley crew: though never explicitly false, this guide twists legitimate historiography and neglects to mention anything that would potentially harm his argument. For example, Spencer argues that Islam spreads through violence while Christianity spreads peaceful conversion. However, this section of the book (which does not contain a single citation, an all too common theme in this text) completely neglects to mention the enslavement and forced conversions of the native peoples of the Americas by Christians. Spencer also attempts to construct an intricate retelling of the Crusades. He claims that Christians were forced to defend themselves from an expanding Muslim empire — an exciting theory which has the potential to be groundbreaking historiography if only he supported it with any actual evidence. The question of the Crusades and their justifications is a large debates in Western historiographic tradition. Unfortunately, Spencer adds nothing to it. He oversimplifies the Crusades to a Muslim versus Christian conflict (a clear result of him trying to make a political statement about the two religions as a whole) while the actual contemporary political and religious milieu was far more nuanced. Spencer simply refuses to use the nuance necessary to perform historical research and relies on ham-handed oversimplifications and generalizations to make his point.
I could go on, but I won’t. The rest of his books follow the same pattern: pseudo-intellectual texts that add nothing to the current discussion (e.g. “A Religion of Peace?: Why Christianity is and Islam Isn’t”) alongside polemic manifestos with no academic or historical significance (e.g. “The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Free Speech (and its enemies)”). Spencer seems to be continuing this trend of manifesto-esque drivel with his upcoming book: “Confessions of an Islamophobe.” (Isn’t it a little odd that all this controversy is occurring right before Spencer’s book drops? Almost like he needs controversy to convince people to buy it, since no one would buy it based on merit and quality.)
………………………….
Note that “Daniel Ally”–or whoever wrote this screed–is unable to point to a single thing that Robert Spencer got wrong, despite this breadth of verbiage. This hardly surprises.
More:
It is painfully clear that Robert Spencer is only popular due to the topics of his books and not their quality. Because of this, I’d like to address Mr. Spencer directly, who, judging by his website, apparently has nothing better to do than read and rant about college newspapers. You severely lack academic credentials and have the historical nuance of an elephant. It is completely understandable why none of your texts have been academically peer reviewed and published, since they would be shot down in seconds. However, despite this, I must congratulate you on your success commodifying the anger and hate pervading this country with your manufactured controversies. It truly takes some form of talent to sell such shoddily written and poorly researched texts.
………………………….
The reference to Spencer having nothing better to do than read college newspapers makes it pretty clear that this is not actually from “Daniel Ally” himself–there is nothing about college newspapers in the story above.
If “Daniel Ally” was merely quoting from another writer this would be different–but he presents it as his own. This is part of a pattern of dishonesty, including posting under other usernames such as “Bullet” and then pretending that he agrees with this poster. Really appalling.
That this writer–whoever it might be–presents Jihad terror as a “manufactured controversy” is just disgusting. But then, Muslim apologists don’t believe that the victims of Jihad have a right to say anything critical about it. *Ugh*.
More:
I also have a question for all Robert Spencer Fans who actually bought Spencer’s snake oil: Why him? All religions including Islam should be discussed and criticized in an academic environment, and there are countless scholars and academics critical of modern Islam, some of whom were even raised in the religion and have firsthand experience with the negative aspects. You could have had your choice of any of them and held an insightful and respectful talk that actually contributes to the discussion of religion in a more academic manner. Yet, you decide to support someone whose books add nothing besides generalizations and spite. Have you simply not read his books? Is this an attempt to be controversial instead of providing actual intellectual content? Do you seriously believe Robert Spencer is the best face for conservatism at ? (sic) If so, go ahead. But don’t complain when no one takes you seriously. Now please don’t delete my comment…My several much more detailed and explanatory Refutations have been deleted by Jihad Watch “So called Defender of Human Rights and Free Speech. Sincerely Daniel
…………………………
The idea that Islam cannot be criticized save in an academic setting is utterly false. Clearly, this poster has no concept of freedom of speech, and certainly no respect for it.
Then, the idea that opposing the savagery of Jihad and Shari’ah is nothing but “spite” is simply grotesque. But then, this poster has spouted apologia for *amputations and stoning*, so this does not surprise.
Then, his claim that large numbers of his posts have been deleted is simply false. In fact, in most cases these were comments that went automatically to moderation because of postings under new usernames.
But this dishonesty from him should not surprise–really, he’s got nothing else.
Wellington says
Superb rebuttals, gravenimage. Well done.
The more anyone tries to defend Islam, the more obvious it is that Islam is simply indefensible and the “defender” is either manifesting their ignorance or their mendacity.
Ecosse1314 says
+100 to you both
gravenimage says
Thank you so much, Wellington and Ecosse.
GreekEmpress says
+1!!!!!!
I don’t know a Surah from a Hadith and have no interest in learning the difference.
My family learned all they needed to know about Islam before, during, and after the Turkish genocides.
gravenimage says
I understand what you mean, GreekEmpress. I have not in any way enjoyed my study of Islam–although this is true of few other subjects.
But after 9/11 I thought it would be important to see what Islam itself actually had to say. I had expected some ambiguous verses that might be interpreted in a violent manner–what I never expected was the unending calls for oppression and bloodshed.
Infidel says
GreekEmpress
A few weeks ago, when RS had his video conference w/ 2 Indians, where he was there for just the first half hour and the other 2 continued an hour after that, I watched the whole thing. One of the guys told the other, “My grandpa and dad both taught me not to trust the muslims. I don’t need to waste my time familiarizing myself w/ the hadiths”. I chuckled when I heard that: the reason RS chose to familiarize himself w/ quran, hadiths, tafseers and siras was that his grandparents and parents told him little, if anything, about muslim attitudes towards Christians. But those of us who either read history or listen to relatives who told us that can skip those stupid books
somehistory says
GE and Infidel,
I don’t read them either…never have, never will…I have seen mozlums’ behavior, felt their ire against me for no reason whatever, heard them speak about their …it isn’t faith…religion, and I don’t feel the need to read the stuff that came straight from satan.
If others want to read, that is their choice, but I chose not to.
James Lincoln says
Superb blow-by-blow takedown, gravenimage.
Factual and evidence-based…
gravenimage says
Thank you, James. This means a great deal to me coming from such a rational commenter as yourself.
commonsense says
Imran Hosein, “scholar,” claims that COVID-19 was created in a lab by Zionists. This does actually make sense, since the Communist Chinese Zionists have been waging a brutal counterjihad against the numerous Muslim Uighurs in western China. It is estimated that around a million Uighurs have been placed in concentration camps built expressly for them, and are subjected to forced re-education to coerce them into renouncing Islam. Yes indeed, it sounds like the Chinese Zionists are at it again.
Curiously, our Islamic Scholar friend says nothing about this. Shouldn’t fighting this outrage be considered fard ayn – a call to arms requiring all Muslims able to fight to sally forth in Allah’s cause? Imran Husein, where are you?
somehistory says
The evidence, and there is a whole boatload, is that the viurs came from the wuhan lab in China, and it wasn’t Jews working on it. It was the chinese making a virus that would be a super bug and would be used as a bio terror weapon against the U.S.
Sen. Rand Paul was on Glenn Beck recently with information about the fact that it has not spread from bats to other animals and then to humans. It hasn’t been found in any living creature except humans.
The wife of one of the scientists at the lab had the virus in 2019.
And now, there is another “bird flu” in china that has been contracted by a human there.
But, mozlums…anywhere, any time of the day or week…are not known for having the actual facts on any subject. This creep is just using the news that is going around about the virus having been manufactured in the chinese lab in wuhan to make trouble for the Jews.
The initial claim that the virus came from a “wet market” is all wet. It came from the lab….where it was made on purpose to be death-dealing.
David M says
I agree, you forget to mention Dr Fauci funded it after his gain of function research was banned in North Carolina, so they then moved it to the Wuhan lab. I would hope it was accidently released from the Wuhan lab, but I wouldn’t rule out an intentional leak by the globalists though.
somehistory says
Thanks, and I didn’t “forget” fachi….There is just too much regarding this quack to put in a short comment, so I left him off my list.
he not only “funded” it with taxpayer money, he lied about what the funding was for, etc.
and I believe they were going to intentionally release it upon the American soccer team in order to get it into the U.S., and perhaps their scientists were careless with it and they got it first, one then giving it to his wife.
gravenimage says
Muslim cleric says ‘Zionists’ manufactured coronavirus to wage biological warfare
……………..
Just ludicrous. The disease clearly originated in China, whatever its exact provenance, *not* in Israel. In fact, the first confirmed case in Israel didn’t appear until February of 2021, over three months after it first appeared in China.
Then, it is not possible to target such a disease at Arabs–and this is clearly not the case, since Asian, Europeans, Africans, and, yes, Jews have all died from it.
Then, the idea that this disease is fundamentally unnatural is bizarre–Coronaviruses of various strains have been identified since the 1920s, and are probably older. And they appear in animals and birds as well as humans.
Israel had a robust medical response to the Coronavirus early on, and has now fully vaccinated over 60% of her population.
The only Muslim country to have vaccinated a large part of its population is Bahrain–most of them, including in the Middle East, are pretty sad. In fact, the Middle Eastern Muslim country with the best record is Jordan, which has fully vaccinated just 14% of its population.
James Lincoln says
So is this muslim cleric going to get everyone in his mosque to start chanting “Death to Chicom Zionists”?
I’m not sure that the Chicoms would be too happy about that – they have a way of making people disappear…
Infidel says
Maybe they can resettle them in Wuhan. I hear that there is a lab there where they are testing gain-of-function viruses funded by the NIAID: maybe these guys can enhance the science
OLD GUY says
Yet another old fool from the school of islamic scholars.
somehistory says
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/washington-post-labeling-lab-leak-as-debunked-conspiracy-theory-was-wrong_3840960.html?utm_source=News&utm_
“Washington Post: Labeling Lab Leak as ‘Debunked Conspiracy Theory’ Was Wrong”
BY ZACHARY STIEBER June 2, 2021 Updated: June 2, 2021biggersmaller Print
The Washington Post quietly has walked back its claims regarding the theory that the virus that causes COVID-19 escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan, China……
Some reporters have said that they disregarded the lab leak theory because Republicans were largely the ones promoting the idea.
Other outlets have also corrected or quietly updated stories, including Vox and Politifact, while Facebook stopped banning posts suggesting the virus was man-made.”
There is more to this article, regarding Sen. Cotton’s remarks, and what others have stated.
gravenimage says
Funny how this investigation is going ahead now, but was considered “racist” when President Trump brought it up.
Infidel says
There is now Fauci’s email from last year, when he himself tells 4 other people that that virus was probably ‘engineered’. Dr Lee Meng-Yan herself described to Tucker Carlson how those pathogens she observed had characterestics that were not naturally occuring: it was like if one created an animal w/ a rabbit’s ear, a deer’s antlers and so on – that was how she explained it