There is domestic violence in all cultures, but only in one does it have divine sanction.
The Qur’an teaches that men are superior to women and should beat those from whom they “fear disobedience”: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34
Muhammad’s child bride, Aisha, says in a hadith that Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: ‘Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?’” — Sahih Muslim 2127
An another hadith states: “Rifa`a divorced his wife whereupon `AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. `Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah’s Messenger came, Aisha said, ‘I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!’” — Sahih Bukhari 7.77.5825
“Woman ‘slaughtered’ – man invokes Sharia law,” translated from “Frau „abgeschlachtet“ – Mann berief sich auf Scharia,” Welt, June 17, 2021 (thanks to Medforth):
The Baden-Baden regional court has sentenced a man to life imprisonment for the murder of his wife and a knife attack on her lover. In its verdict on Wednesday, however, the court did not follow the prosecution’s request to establish the particular severity of guilt. In that case, early release from prison after 15 years would have been virtually impossible.
However, it considered insidiousness and base motives to be given. The judge spoke of an “ungodly deed”. The 37-year-old had been aware of the consequences from the beginning and had literally “slaughtered” his wife.
The accused Syrian killed his 36-year-old wife with a knife in her Rastatt apartment on September 20, after kicking open the door. The lover escaped with several cuts. The police arrested the suspect on the same day at the Rastatt train station. According to the investigators at the time, the couple had quarreled earlier. The man was only reported to have been reprimanded the evening before the crime.
The perpetrator relied on Sharia law
The judge said that the man was proud of what he had done and relied on Sharia law, which allowed him to punish his wife. It was clear to him that he would have to go to prison for this. He said that to his brother. The 37-year-old was fully guilty.
The judgment is not yet final (Ref .: 1 Ks 300 Js 13270/20). The man’s defense lawyer demanded a lighter sentence and pleaded for manslaughter: In his view, neither the victim was ignorant nor was the act insidious, because the man had threatened his wife. The defendant himself remained silent in court.
PRCS says
Sharia–the path/straight path is Islam’s Yellow Brick Road.
Islamic law is what keeps Muslims on it–or else.
Islamic law is antithetical to, incompatible with, and must remain subordinate to the West’s secular, man-made laws.
So glad the German court understood that.
Keith O says
PRCS, Sharia is incompatible not just with western laws but with civilised humanity as well.
It is, just like Islam, a barbaric practice that is still operating in the dark ages.
william says
PRCS Though apparently his defence lawyer does not. A lighter sentence? he murdered one and tried to murder another. I wonder if his wife was a German, I mean really German not an import. He should be deported at the end of his sentence
Ray Jarman says
A man slaughters his wife and his lawyer says, “In his view, neither the victim was ignorant nor was the act insidious, because the man had threatened his wife.” I know that there are a few lawyers here on the site and I am curious how this crime of murder should be reduced to manslaughter because his wife knew he was angry. It is one of the most ludicrous statement I have heard or read.
One other note is that Biden & Co. are setting the stage to prevent readers here at Jihad Watch, Pam Geller and Bare Naked Islam from obtaining the truth. The article is here:
Biden Admin Turns National Security Agencies Against Online ‘Misinformation’ (freebeacon.com)
somehistory says
And had she defended herself, or had the other guy defended her, what then? Probably charges against them for hurting the mozlum attacker if they were successful.
I read on another site that they are going after “online hate”…to shut down any who say things they don’t like.
gravenimage says
+1
Ray Jarman says
Thank you Gravenimage. I value your comments.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Ray.
Giacomo Latta says
Defence lawyers, ya gotta … no, ya don’t gotta lov’em.
David M says
They sell their soul to the devil for the right amount of coin.
somehistory says
Hang him high and set an example for those who believe that their book of filth is “law.” It is pure lawlessness, filthy evil, and a person’s inborn conscience should recognize this. If it does and they still readily “obey” the hate, murder, rape demands, then they are psychopaths and won’t be any different when released from prison.
And the “defense lawyer” arguing that the “victim was not ignorant because the murderer had threatened her,” is despicable. Whether or not she knew he would do as he did should not be a reason for a “lighter sentence.” The scum should hang for what he did.
gravenimage says
If anything, this thug threatening her shows premeditation.
PRCS says
Premeditated.
As the article states:
“Only the evening before the crime, charges had been filed against the man and he was ordered to leave the premises.”
gravenimage says
Yep.
Walter Sieruk says
This further shows the Sharia law is so very brutal ,cruel that that it even allows murder.
This should really be no surprise because Sharia law is based on a man made brutal cruel religion. Islam, that even encourages murder.
The imams and the other propagandists for are even so dishonest that they call an evil action of malicious vicious cold-blood first degree murder by the absurd title of “honor killing.”
They can call is what they want to but the fact remains the murder is murder.
PRCS says
A subtle note, Walter.
The post, per Robert Spencer’s headline states:
Germany: Muslim migrant murders his wife, invokes Sharia in court, says it allows him to punish her
Islamic law defines and controls sharia; like the Federal and/or state laws we are supposed to follow while driving.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
In comparing the two sexes, Allah, who refers to himself in the third person, says, “Allah has made the one superior to the other,” but coyly does not say which is which. Allah the proto-feminist.
gravenimage says
Germany: Muslim migrant murders his wife, invokes Sharia in court, says it allows him to punish her
…………….
This is how pious Muslims think–and they don’t seen anything ungodly in this savagery, since as they see it “Allah” approves.
Fred van de Bunt says
“The judge said that the man was proud of what he had done and relied on Sharia law.”
I am proud of my own laws, and do not like to pay for his lifetime expenses in prison.
And I do not like a judge that obliges me to pay for a lifetime for that scum.
gravenimage says
Still, it would have been worse if he had given the murderer a slap on the wrist.
James Lincoln says
I’m not an attorney, but it sure sounds to me like 1st° murder.
A sane society would fire up “Old Sparky”…
gravenimage says
+1