Home Determination of sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits for a point of care high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Determination of sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits for a point of care high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay

  • Fred S. Apple EMAIL logo , Karen Schulz , Christian W. Schmidt ORCID logo , Trees S. Y. van Domburg , Judith M. Fonville and Femke K. de Theije
Published/Copyright: May 24, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

High sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponin (cTn) assays are defined per the IFCC Committee on Clinical Application of Cardiac Biomarker (C-CB) by the ability to measure ≥ 50% of concentrations greater than the limit of detection (LoD) with an impression of ≤10% at sex-specific 99th percentiles. Our study determined the sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits for males and females utilizing heparinized plasma from AACC universal sample bank for the Siemens point of care (POC) Atellica® VTLi hs-cTnI immunoassay.

Methods

Apparently healthy subjects, included overall 693, males 363, and females 330, following exclusionary surrogate biomarker use of hemoglobin A1c, NT-proBNP, and eGFR, along with statin medication. hs-cTnI was measured in a central laboratory, on multiple POC Atellica® VTLi immunoassay analyzers. The LoD was 1.24 ng/L and the 10%CV concentration was 6.7 ng/L. 99th percentile URLs were determined by the nonparametric (NP) method.

Results

Histograms of the hs-cTnI concentrations (ng/L) for males and females were used to visualize the distributions and concentrations in men and women and differed significantly (pre- and post-exclusion, both p <0.001). 99th percentile URLs were: overall 23 ng/L (90% CI 20–32 ng/L); male 27 ng/L (CI 21–37 ng/L); female 18 ng/L (CI 9–78 ng/L). The percentages of subjects having a measurable concentration ≥ the LoD were: overall 83.7%, male 87.3%, female 79.7%.

Conclusions

Our findings show the novel POC Atellica® VTLi hs-cTnI assay meets the designation of a ‘high-sensitivity’ assay using heparinized plasma.


Corresponding author: Fred S. Apple, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin Healthcare/HCMC, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute/Hennepin County Medical Center, Clinical Laboratories P4, 701 Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA; and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, Phone: +612 873 3324, Fax: +612 904 4229, E-mail:

Funding source: Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

Award Identifier / Grant number: Funded in part

Funding source: Siemens Healthineers

  1. Research funding: This study was funded in part by Siemens Healthineers.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: FSA: Board of Directors, HyTest Ltd.; Honorarium Advisory Boards: Siemens Healthcare, Instrumentation Laboratory, Qorvo; Research PI through Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (not salaried): Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Point of Care, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthcare, Quidel/Alere, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Beckman Coulter; Other: Associate Editor Clinical Chemistry.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board.

References

1. Apple, FS, Jaffe, AS, Collinson, P, Mockel, M, Ordonez-Llanos, J, Lindahl, B, et al.. On behalf of the IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers. IFCC educational materials on selected analytical and clinical applications of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Biochem 2015;48:201–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.08.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Wu, AHB, Christenson, RH, Greene, DN, Jaffe, AS, Kavsak, PA, Ordonez-Llanos, J, et al.. Clinical laboratory practice recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin in acute coronary syndrome: expert opinion from the Academy of the American Association for clinical Chemistry and the Task Force on clinical applications of cardiac Bio-markers of the International Federation of clinical Chemistry and laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2018;64:645–55. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.277186.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Apple, FS, Fantz, CR, Collinson, PO. Implementation of high-sensitivity and point of care cardiac troponin assays into practice: some different thoughts. Clin Chem 2021;67:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa264.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Apple, FS, Wu, AHB, Sandoval, Y, Sexter, A, Love, SA, Myers, G, et al.. Sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits for high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays derived using a universal sample bank. Clin Chem 2020;66:434–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvz029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Wu, AHB, Apple, F, Love, SA, Koch, D, Myers, GL, Christenson, RH. On behalf of the AACC’s Biomarkers of Acute Cardiovascular Disease Division. Creation of a universal sample bank for determining the 99th percentile for cardiac troponin assays. J Appl Lab Med 2017;1:711–9. https://doi.org/10.1373/jalm.2016.022897.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Wu, AHB, Lynch, K, Sexter, A, Apple, FS. Upper reference limits and percent measurable concentration using universal sample bank for high sensitivity cardiac troponin point of care assay. Cin Biochem 2020;83:89–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.05.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Sandoval, Y, Apple, FS. The global need to define normality: the 99th percentile value of cardiac troponin. Clin Chem 2013;60:455–62. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.211706.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Collinson, PO, Hwung, YM, Gaze, D, Boa, F, Senior, R, Christenson, R, et al.. Influence of population selection on the 99th percentile reference value for cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem 2012;58:219–25. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.171082.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Sandoval, Y, Apple, FS, Saenger, AK, Collinson, PO, Wu, AHB, Jaffe, AS. 99th Percentile upper-reference limit of cardiac troponin and the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 2020;66:1167–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa158.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Bruls, DM, Evers, TH, Kahlman, JA, van Lankvelt, PJ, Ovsyanko, M, Pelssers, EG, et al.. Rapid integrated biosensor for multiplexed immunoassays based on actuated magnetic nanoparticles. Lab Chip 2009;9:3504–10. https://doi.org/10.1039/b913960.Search in Google Scholar

11. Finnegan, D. Reference intervals: R package version 1.1.1; 2014. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=referenceIntervals [Accessed 12 Mar 2021].Search in Google Scholar

12. Thygesen, K, Alpert, JS, Jaffe, AS, Chaitman, BR, Bax, JJ, Morrow, DA, et al.. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J 2018;40:237–69.10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Sandoval, Y, Smith, SW, Love, SA, Sexter, A, Schulz, K, Apple, FS. Single high sensitivity cardiac troponin I to rule out acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2017;130:1076–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Sandoval, Y, Nowak, R, deFilippi, CR, Christenson, RH, Peacock, WF, McCord, J, et al.. Myocardial infarction risk stratification with a single measurement of high-sensitivity troponin I. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:271–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Anand, A, Lee, KK, Chapman, AR, Ferry, AV, Adamson, PD, Berry, C, et al.. On behalf of the Historic Investigators. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin on presentation to rule out myocardial infarction: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2021. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.120.052380.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Available from: https://www.ifcc.org/media/478594/point-of-care-cardiac-troponin-i-and-t-assay-analytical-characteristics-designated-by-manufacturer-v072020.pdf [Accessed 6 Apr 2021].Search in Google Scholar

17. Available from: https://www.ifcc.org/media/478592/high-sensitivity-cardiac-troponin-i-and-t-assay-analytical-characteristics-designated-by-manufacturer-v072020.pdf [Accessed 6 Apr 2021].Search in Google Scholar

18. Apple, FS, Collinson, PO, Kavsak, PA, Body, R, Ordóñez-Llanos, J, Saenger, AK, et al.. On behalf of the IFCC committee clinical Application of cardiac biomarkers. The IFCC clinical Application of cardiac biomarkers committee’s appraisal of the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without Persistent ST-segment Elevation: getting cardiac troponin right. Clin Chem 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa337.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Singh, J, Akbar, MS, Adabag, S. Discordance of cardiac troponin I assays on the point of care i-STAT and ARCHITECT assays from Abbott Diagnostics. Clin Chim Acta 2009:259–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.01.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Sandoval, Y, Smith, SW, Sexter, A, Thordsen, SE, Bruen, CA, Carlson, MD, et al.. Type 1 and 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury: clinical transition to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med 2017;130:1431–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Christenson, RH, Frenk, LDS, de Graaf, HJ, van Domburg TSY, Wijnands, FPG, Foolen, HWJ, et al.. Guidance for the analytical characterizing point-of-care high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays intended for plasma and whole blood measurements. Clin Biochem 2021.10.1093/jalm/jfac028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-03-01
Accepted: 2021-05-14
Published Online: 2021-05-24
Published in Print: 2021-08-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. High-sensitivity assay for cardiac troponins with POCT methods. The future is soon
  4. Review
  5. The assessment of circulating cell-free DNA as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative ssays
  6. Mini Review
  7. Which laboratory technique is used for the blood sodium analysis in clinical research? A systematic review
  8. Guidelines and Recommendations
  9. IFCC interim guidelines on rapid point-of-care antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals
  10. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  11. Multicenter evaluation of use of dried blood spot compared to conventional plasma in measurements of globotriaosylsphingosine (LysoGb3) concentration in 104 Fabry patients
  12. S100B protein, cerebral ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging patterns in brain injured preterm infants
  13. Urinary exosomal CD26 is associated with recovery from acute kidney injury in intensive care units: a prospective cohort study
  14. Evaluation of red blood cell parameters provided by the UF-5000 urine auto-analyzer in patients with glomerulonephritis
  15. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  16. Pediatric reference interval verification for common biochemical assays on the Abbott Alinity system
  17. Paediatric reference range for overnight urinary cortisol corrected for creatinine
  18. Cancer Diagnostics
  19. Circulating pro-gastrin releasing peptide (ProGRP) in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma
  20. Cardiovascular Diseases
  21. Determination of sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits for a point of care high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay
  22. Comparison of the analytical performance of the PATHFAST high sensitivity cardiac troponin I using fresh whole blood vs. fresh plasma samples
  23. Infectious Diseases
  24. Comprehensive assessment of humoral response after Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination: a three-case series
  25. Analytical validation of an automated assay for the measurement of adenosine deaminase (ADA) and its isoenzymes in saliva and a pilot evaluation of their changes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection
  26. A new tool for sepsis screening in the Emergency Department
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Caveat emptor – hidden pitfalls in defining the 99th percentile of cardiac troponin assays
  29. Assay requirements for COVID-19 testing: serology vs. rapid antigen tests
  30. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in FTA card spot-prep samples derived from nasopharyngeal swabs
  31. Homocysteine (Hcy) assessment to predict outcomes of hospitalized Covid-19 patients: a multicenter study on 313 Covid-19 patients
  32. Concomitant immune thrombocytopenia and bone marrow hemophagocytosis in a patient with SARS-CoV-2
  33. Procalcitonin measurement by Diazyme™ immunturbidimetric and Elecsys BRAHMS™ PCT assay on a Roche COBAS modular analyzer
  34. Use of Neurosoft expert system improves turnaround time in a laboratory section specialized in protein diagnostics: a two-year experience
  35. Impact of different sampling and storage procedures on stability of acid/base parameters in venous blood samples
  36. Compound heterozygotes of Hb Constant Spring and Hb Stanleyville II in HbE/β0-thalassemia
  37. Congress Abstracts
  38. 60th National Congress of the Hungarian Society of Laboratory Medicine
Downloaded on 3.7.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2021-0262/html
Scroll to top button