The modus operandi of “progressive” and Islamic supremacist leaders with regard to immigration:
i) Swing the doors open to unvetted immigration.
ii) Demand that everyone accept their suicidal immigration policies, otherwise they’re “racists” and/or “Islamophobes.”
iii) Then scream “islamophobia” and racism again when crime rates soar, and people make the connection.
iv) Run for cover and security — courtesy of taxpayers who bear the brunt of the fallout.
Such is the case with the Muslim mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who has turned London into a crime-fest with heightened jihad threats while favoring Britain’s open-door immigration policies. Khan ignored the real issue while he initiated police action against offensive speech “crimes” online.
Two years ago, a report emerged that the situation was so out of hand in London that Somali parents were sending children back home to save them from knife attacks. Jihad Watch reported in March 2019:
A “knife crime epidemic that has struck London and seen 51 murders this year,” and a Muslim migrant “acid gang” was sentenced four months ago following violent, unprovoked attacks on gays. London gangs also include “the Mali Boys“, which are becoming “more ‘organised, ruthless and driven by drugs profits.” Mali is a Muslim country plagued by Islamic rebel groups aiming to impose strict Islamic law across the country. The groups include: Ansar Dine, Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the Signed-in-Blood Battalion and the Islamic Movement for Azawad. Somali rape gangs have also victimized girls in London.
Welcome to the open-door globalist dream! where anyone can bring anything (including jihad and crime) to the West; and no-one had better challenge it, otherwise he or she will be branded “racist.”
Khan’s personal record also includes the following:
- He has endorsed anti-Semites, defended 9/11 terrorists, and defended an al Qaeda member.
- Khan has played the victimology narrative to the point of cautioning Westerners to play by the rules of Islamic supremacists, so as to not upset them to the point of joining jihadi groups.
- He has called deadly jihad attacks “part and parcel” of life in a big city.
- He has called progressive Muslims who want to live in unison with Westerners “uncle Toms.”
Now he’s screaming “Islamophobia” and has 24/7 taxpayer-funded protection. Unfortunately, victims of crime who help pay for his security do not have round-the-clock protection for themselves and their families. As succinctly expressed in the article below: “Safety for me, but not for thee.”
“Safety for Me, But Not for Thee: London Mayor Sadiq Khan Says He Needs 24/7 Protection Because of His Faith”, by Kurt Zindulka, Breitbart, September 29, 2021:
The leftist mayor of London Sadiq Khan has admitted that he is protected by an around-the-clock security detail while he fails to protect the people from crime in the city which he is charged with governing.
Claiming that he needs protection because of the “colour of his skin and the god he worships”, Mr Khan told Labour Party members at a conference meeting in Brighton on Tuesday that he is currently protected by a team of 15 police officers “around the clock”.
The far-left mayor came under criticism last month for failing to live up to his professed green politics by taking a three-car convoy to take his dog for a walk in Tooting Common.
Mr Khan, who has past form in using his religious identity to score political points — notably in endless diplomatic spats with former President Donald Trump — said that it was his race and religion which necessitated his security detail, implicitly stating that multicultural London is not safe for people of his background.
“The mayor of the greatest city in the world needs protection 24 hours a day, seven days a week because of the colour of his skin and the god he worships, that can’t be right,” Khan said according to The Telegraph.
“I’m not going to allow these racists and these Islamophobes to intimidate me, and I’ll never bow to them,” he added….
A7E.Pilgrim says
If there are threats, where are the arrests, the prosecutions, the convictions?
Eva says
They don’t need them. A moslem said it, so it must be so.
However, if you or I said something along these lines about moslems, complete with the abundance of evidence there already is, they’d lock us up and throw away the key.
mortimer says
Agree with Eva. The onus of proof is now on the non-Muslims. Just think of the families of the girls who were groomed by the Muslim rapists. They were told to be quiet.
Anyone threatened by Muslims will be sloughed off by the British police until they are stabbed by a Muslim and its caught on camera … at that point, the police have to respond.
The British public don’t get 24/7 protection if Muslims dislike them and make threats.
gravenimage says
Good point.
Raja says
Is he afraid of knife attacks, bomb attacks, some thugs threatening him? His brethren are a nuisance to the world, on killing and raping spree in every nook and corner of the globe.
I thought I already knew who needs to be restrained or watched all the time.
He has spoken like a real Muslim as they are always the victims. Absolutely shameless creature…
somehistory says
Absolutely.
Keys says
Yep, the infidels might behead him and yell “God is greater !”
mortimer says
To Raja: Sadiq Khan defended jihad-terrorists in court, so he’s in their good books with nothing to fear. They may need him to be their lawyer in future.
Sadiq Khan is well known to be soft on jihad. That’s why so many Britons would resent him. He is on the side of the jihadists, not on the side of England.
Westman says
Doesn’t a hyena make the imitation sound of fear and pain then sink its teeth into its prey at the first opportunity?
Mayor Khan says, “The mayor of the greatest city in the world needs protection 24 hours a day, seven days a week because of the colour of his skin and the god he worships..”
Hmmm…
MP Geert Wilders, in the Netherlands, “needs protection 24 hours a day, seven days a week because of people the colour of Khan’s skin and the god Khan worships.”
How could anyone, of free will, choose to worship a god who demands that he/she be murdered by believers upon leaving Islam for no, or, another religion? Of course the truth is children and the ignorant are led into it – then free will is puposefully extinguished.
somehistory says
Speaking of himself in third person. Like A. Christie’s Poirot.
john smith says
Spot on Westman.
somehistory says
Psychopaths don’t have “faith.” This is true of this mozlum psychopath.
It isn’t “faith.” It’s an arrogant belief that they can do no wrong and if you disagree, you are worth only being murdered….in awful and horrendous ways. And, as the psychopath mozlum that he is, he is pointing the finger of guilt for murderous intent at innocent people. How many times has he wished to be the one holding the knife to the throat of an infidel? He is in a seat of power to point and accuse and have people threatened with jail time if they don’t just adore and worship him and his mzlum buds.
somehistory says
Perhaps his “dog” will turn on him and then he can really feel threatened. Poor dog.
john smith says
Better still, some imams from the mosque could even turn on him, doesn’t he know muslims shouldn’t be keeping a dog.
somehistory says
Perhaps he keeps a dog to keep the imams from attacking him …keeping their distance…who could like a creature such as he?
Eva says
It’s not ‘islamofauxbia’ when the threat is real. And every moslem poses a threat.
However, if he’d like to meet a real ‘islamofauxbe’, up close and personal, I’d be happy to oblige.
David says
If he ever changes his religion he will need a lot more protection
gravenimage says
+1
Keith O says
The Brits have gotten exactly what they voted for.
I have zero sympathy for them as they have brought this disgusting situation upon themselves.
gravenimage says
Not all Britons voted for this thug–just as not all Americans voted for Ilhan Omar or Rashida Tlaib.
Ade Fegan says
I get the impression that he hates non muslims
john smith says
So Mr Khan needs round the clock protection from all us racist British islamophobes. If he is so frightened of us why hell doesn’t he piss off back to the rat infested hole were he belongs, Pakistan.
somehistory says
I was thinking the same thing…he could go over and feel right at home…except he wouldn’t have the cushy life, the big salary, and the pakis wouldn’t allow him to have an armed guard or a dog.
It is strange to me that people move to a place where they are sure they will find bigots and then whine and complain about the bigotry. Not that you guys over there are what he claims, but if you were, why move there in the first place?
Honest, ethical persons won’t go where they know they are not wanted and then expect everyone else to make big changes in order tor the person to feel wanted and needed. He should make a hasty path to someplace where people are just like him, then he would have something real about which to complain.
Infidel says
I have a better idea for him. Why doesn’t he fire his current security, and hire only muslims in his security entourage? I mean, surely he can’t trust infidel police w/ protecting him, can he?
gravenimage says
Infidels are likely the only ones he *can* trust. Security officers in the Muslim would regularly turn on and murder those they are supposed to be protecting if they are deemed “insufficienlty Islamic”.
Walter Sieruk says
In reality it’s the British citizens of the United Kingdom who are in need of protection from Muslims who are vicious bloody violent and murderous jihadists.
As those in those London jihad knife stabbings, vehicle attacks and even a hatching.
Likewise, another example was that tragic and deadly Muslim terrorist with his suicide/homicide bomb attack at the music concert that was held in the city of Manchester in which many innocent young girls were murdered and many more terrible injured.
So that scaredy –cat , cry baby , Muslim mayor of London has some gall complaining about his own safety needs ,caring nothing about the British people . What an awful cowardly selfish despicable man his actually is.
john smith says
Perfectly stated Walter.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Walter.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
“Mr Khan, who has past form in using his religious identity to score political points …”
What does it mean “to have past form in” something? Is this a Briticism?
gravenimage says
I’m familiar with a lot of Britishisms, Mark, but I haven’t run across this one.
Ecosse1314 says
Means hes done this before
gravenimage says
Thank you, Ecosse–that’s what I assumed from context, but had not seen the phrase before.
Ecosse1314 says
Normally i would say ” he has previous for this” but “past form” is ok too.
tgusa says
15 man bodyguard team. He is moving up. Hitler started out with 8. Try being a young Christian girl in your home country of Pakistan little man.
somehistory says
I only disagree with one word in your comment: “man.” He isn’t one. male, yes, man, no
tgusa says
Noted. I thought about using another term to describe him but I couldn’t think of one that would be allowed in polite company.
somehistory says
How about “clod”?
tgusa says
Ok. That can be used in polite company but that is not exactly any description that was going through my mind.
gravenimage says
UK: London’s Muslim mayor says he needs 24/7 protection because of ‘racists and Islamophobes’
…………..
Almost certainly bs. Have there been arrests of anyone threatening Khan? Of course not–I haven’t found anything.
James Lincoln says
gravenimage says,
“Have there been arrests of anyone threatening Khan? Of course not–I haven’t found anything.”
Correct.
Just lying muslim “spin”…
gravenimage says
It’s projection, James.
James Lincoln says
+1
tim gallagher says
I’m sure that I remember this Muslim mayor, in relation to Muslim terrorist attacks,saying that they are just part of living in big cities now. Yeah, if you have Muslims in those cities then that is definitely true. So I hope he does get plenty of blow back and threats. It is more than likely just the usual Muslim whingeing about how they are the poor victims. London must have become a pretty strange place these days if they voted this Muslim jerk into the office of mayor. He seems to be nothing but a monumental pain in the arse from everything I have ever heard from him.
somehistory says
Yes, he did say it was just a part of living there. He wanted people to just get used to it.
tim gallagher says
Yes, somehistory, it is not the sort of quote from someone that you forget. For me, that quote, which got a bit of a mention out here in Australia at the time he made it, will always be something that defines this particular maggot. What a sickening quote. As I said, up above, if you let Muslims into your country, then it is true that you’ll have terrorist attacks. A bloody good reason to shut them out in the way that Hungary does. The people in civilised non-Muslim countries should never just get used to murderous terrorist attacks.
gravenimage says
Yes–a just appalling quote. Terrorism was not part and parcel of living in most cities in the west until just recently with the Muslim invasion.
Leonard Dunnet says
*no he dosen’t he’s expendable. We can easily find a mooron to do the job as well as him.
Bikinis not Burkas says
Maybe because he is of the wrong Islamic sect?
OLD GUY says
Just goes to show how well the Islamic migration invasion of the world is moving along. Islam’s number one plan, we don’t want to be like you, we want to rule over you. And you stupid infidels will allow us to do so through open borders and allowing us to change your laws and society to what we want. Total world domination by Islamic leaders with lots of slaves and no more Jews.
No that can’t be true, Islam is all about love and peace. Yes. they want a piece of you and they love what you have. POWER & GREED
David Foot says
What about those “Refugees Welcome” politicians? Many of the “benefit seekers” professing the Anglophobe evil cult, a danger to young ENGLISH pupils and their ENGLISH teachers who can’t even teach. Do these victim politicians care about the danger to the ENGLISH or welcome the danger to the ENGLISH?
The ENGLISH Police protect the Anglophobes but don’t protect the English as in Batley! No protection. No enforcing our laws of freedom of speech and to teach! No protection for the Sovereignty of our law. In Batley the alien enemy Sharia law took precedence over English law under pain of death!
The Anglophobes can publish their hate filled texts of the evil prophet but we can’t even make a cartoon of such an evil politician? Whose is the sovereignty in England? Who has freedom to speak in England? Even the queen reportedly supports the Marxist BLM who attacked our capital and our flag on June 7 2020. These were supposed to be her capital and her flag!
Are the ENGLISH Police going to take the Batley teacher to work and to walk his dog? You must be joking they only would do that for the enemies of England, to undermine the laws of England and even to “uphold the rights of protesters” which are more important than tax payers losing their plane (for example). In the same way the Border Farce is paid to undermines the borders of England and its immigration laws assisted by the RNLI volunteers because they can’t cope with the amount of people wanting to break UK immigration law. No traffic lights and no point system, if they want to break UK law the Crown will help and assist them!
Any similarity with the English State of Elizabeth I is a pure coincidence and was never intended!
Ben Dejo says
Calling people Islamophobes it’s like calling European Jews of the 1930’s 1940’s Naziphobes
PATRIOT1776 says
It’s a Dam shame that law abiding citizens of England have a 2nd Amendment to protect themselves and their families.
ed says
But khan is STILL mayor