Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 23, 2021

Antiphospholipid antibodies quantification using ALBIA technology: how to define an optimal cutoff?

  • Oscar Cabrera-Marante ORCID logo , David Lora , Manuel Serrano , Edgard A. Rodríguez de Frías , Laura Naranjo , Dolores Pérez , Estela Paz-Artal , Daniel E. Pleguezuelo and Antonio Serrano ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Corresponding author: Antonio Serrano, MD PhD, Servicio de Inmunología, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; and Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain, Phone: +34 659 496 544, E-mail:
Oscar Cabrera-Marante and David Lora share first authorship.

Funding source: Instituto de Salud Carlos III 10.13039/50110000458

Award Identifier / Grant number: PI17-00147

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Carmen Caballero Polo and Margarita Sevilla, Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, for their excellent technical assistance.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by grant number PI17-00147 from “Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness, co-funded with European Regional Development Funds).

  2. Author contributions: Conceptualization, methodology and funding acquisition A.S.; references collection D.P. Statistical analysis D.L.; writing, review and editing, O.C-M. Review, M.S. and E.RdF. Supervision, E.P-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Board (CEIM 18/182).

References

1. Cervera, R. Antiphospholipid syndrome. Thromb Res 2017;151 (1 Suppl): S43–S7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0049-3848(17)30066-x.Search in Google Scholar

2. Miyakis, S, Lockshin, MD, Atsumi, T, Branch, DW, Brey, RL, Cervera, R, et al.. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x.Search in Google Scholar

3. Kaul, R, Johnson, K, Scholz, H, Marr, G. Performance of the BioPlex 2200 autoimmune vasculitis kit. Autoimmun Rev 2009;8:224–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2008.07.033.Search in Google Scholar

4. Perez, D, Gilburd, B, Cabrera-Marante, O, Martinez-Flores, JA, Serrano, M, Naranjo, L, et al.. Predictive autoimmunity using autoantibodies: screening for anti-nuclear antibodies. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:171–7.10.1515/cclm-2017-0241Search in Google Scholar

5. Desplat-Jego, S, Bardin, N, Larida, B, Sanmarco, M. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen for the detection of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1109:245–55. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1398.030.Search in Google Scholar

6. Branden, LJ, Smith, CI. Bioplex technology: novel synthetic gene delivery system based on peptides anchored to nucleic acids. Methods Enzymol 2002;346:106–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(02)46051-x.Search in Google Scholar

7. Fulton, RJ, McDade, RL, Smith, PL, Kienker, LJ, Kettman, JRJr. Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system. Clin Chem 1997;43:1749–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/43.9.1749.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chayoua, W, Kelchtermans, H, Moore, GW, Gris, JC, Musial, J, Wahl, D, et al.. Detection of anti-cardiolipin and anti-beta2glycoprotein I antibodies differs between platforms without influence on association with clinical symptoms. Thromb Haemost 2019;119:797–806. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1679901.Search in Google Scholar

9. Ruffatti, A, Olivieri, S, Tonello, M, Bortolati, M, Bison, E, Salvan, E, et al.. Influence of different IgG anticardiolipin antibody cut-off values on antiphospholipid syndrome classification. J Thromb Haemostasis 2008;6:1693–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03121.x.Search in Google Scholar

10. Tincani, A, Allegri, F, Balestrieri, G, Reber, G, Sanmarco, M, Meroni, P, et al.. Minimal requirements for antiphospholipid antibodies ELISAs proposed by the European Forum on antiphospholipid antibodies. Thromb Res 2004;114:553–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2004.06.035.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lopez, LR, Santos, ME, Espinoza, LR, La Rosa, FG. Clinical significance of immunoglobulin A versus immunoglobulins G and M anti-cardiolipin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Correlation with thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and recurrent abortion. Am J Clin Pathol 1992;98:449–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/98.4.449.Search in Google Scholar

12. Aggarwal, R, Ringold, S, Khanna, D, Neogi, T, Johnson, SR, Miller, A, et al.. Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria?. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:891–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22583.Search in Google Scholar

13. Furmanczyk-Zawiska, A, Baczkowska, T, Sadowska, A, Szmidt, J, Chmura, A, Durlik, M. Antiphospholipid antibodies in renal allograft recipients. Transplant Proc 2013;45:1655–60.10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.043Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Andreoli, L, Chighizola, CB, Banzato, A, Pons-Estel, GJ, Ramire de Jesus, G, Erkan, D. Estimated frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with pregnancy morbidity, stroke, myocardial infarction, and deep vein thrombosis: a critical review of the literature. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65:1869–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22066.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-02-03
Accepted: 2021-06-13
Published Online: 2021-06-23
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2021-0394/html
Scroll to top button