Sharia denies the freedom of speech, the equality of rights of women, and right of homosexuals to live at all. What will Germany be like once Omid Nouripour’s vision is implemented?
“New leader of Germany’s Greens said parts of Sharia law are compatible with country’s constitution,” by John Cody, ReMix News, February 1, 2022 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
It has been announced that Omid Nouripour will lead the Greens together with Ricarda Lang, but the male portion of the male-female leadership duo is being singled out for comments he made in the past.
The Muslim Nouripour seems to have a special connection to the Sharia, with him saying in 2017 that parts of it should be integrated into Germany’s basic law. The former Muslim civil rights activist Ali Utlu pointed out his speech on Twitter, writing: “The color of this party is the same as that of Islam. Green. Will homosexuals eventually be killed and have their limbs cut off? Resist this from the beginning!”
So what did Nouripoor actually say in his speech? He had been responding to an Alternative for Germany (AfD) politician’s speech criticizing Sharia and listing a number of crimes and cases of anti-Semitism, ostensibly due to Germany’s rising Muslim population.
Nouripoor responded: “There are many types of Sharia on the way. Our job here is to ensure that the parts that are compatible with the Basic Law can also be applied. And they don’t, just not. But there are numerous types of Sharia. I wonder if he means the Reclam edition when he says Sharia. Do you know what he’s talking about? And the second question is: The history of Islam is a very long history of possible interpretations, and up to the end of the 19th century there was always a sentence under every expert opinion that said, ‘But how it really is, no one knows, only they do God of believers’.”
Nouripoor also said that certain parts of Sharia are simply not compatible with Germany’s constitution. However, he never elaborates about which types of Sharia are compatible with Germany’s Basic Law and which are not.
Sharia law is not just a brutal code that leads gay people to be killed or women to be oppressed, but also sets for a number of rules for Muslims to live by, ranging from dietary restrictions to prayer. The code is meant to regulate Muslim behavior within the family and greater society.
Much of it runs completely contrary to the open society that Germans pride themselves on in a democratic state. It decides what people drink, who they marry, how women are treated, along with how homosexuals and people of different faiths and minorities are treated. Much of the rules around sharia law are simply incompatible with Germany’s constitution as it stands….</blockquote
Buraq says
OK, let’s see. Those parts of Sharia’h that are compatible with German law are clearly redundant, and those that are not are illegal. Case closed!
somehistory says
+10
mortimer says
Agree with Buraq. But further to that, how about IRRELEVANCE? Sharia is largely irrelevant..
Much of Sharia involves how Muslims should act on the toilet or while eating or dressing themselves or breaking wind during prayers, and such matters are totally irrelevant to German laws.
As well, much of Sharia involves obsessive-compulsive rituals: wash three times here and there, use sand if you don’t have water.. Such Sharia laws are completely irrelevant to all but Muslims.
Another large part of Sharia law manuals involve the Islamic rules for SLAVERY and those parts are still considered to be ‘ETERNAL DECREES’ of Allah that may not be changed. Slavery is not compatible with modern German law either.
Omid Nouripour must be thinking of German law UNDER THE THIRD REICH when the laws were largely compatible with Sharia law. Yeah, that must be it.
Omid Nouripour was thinking of the compatibility of Sharia with NAZI LAWS, Nuremberg laws, and so forth.
Graham Bryant says
NOTHING IN SHARIA IS COMPATIBLE WITH GERMANY OR THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION-IT IS AGAINST THE LAWS OF GOD OUR GREAT CREATOR OF THE BIBLE
gravenimage says
Spot on, Buraq.
BTeboe says
And what parts of the Qur’an are compatible with German laws? Just saying it does not make it so. I think a published list is in order.
gravenimage says
*Exactly*.
Jim says
The Green Party should be disbanded and forgotten. Sharia is the word of Allah, only one interpretation is permitted, and any attempts to modernize and revise it could be met by violence. Thus the most awful commandments in the scriptures and the worst things in the life of the Prophet are unchangeable, as numerous theologians say repeatedly. This Green leader may be practicing the lies that the Prophet authorized if it advances the cause. The Greens have served their purpose and should no longer win elections. It would be better to look elsewhere for enlightenment. One might just as well say that Mein Kampf is partly compatible with the German constitution. Or with the US Constitution or with the Bible. Or with Baseball cards, for that matter. What difference does it make?
VitoE says
Spot on Jim!
Wellington says
What about the parts that aren’t?
mortimer says
I can assure people from a knowledge of the Sharia manual that Omid Nouripour is a great big LIAR. Sharia removes the human rights and civil liberties of women and non-Muslims.
Almost all of Sharia law is incompatible with modern human rights codes and modern civil liberties. I keep a copy of the Sharia law manual beside my desk and have a copy of it on my hard drive which I may consult topically.
Sharia law is discriminatory. In the modern world, you are not allowed to discriminate. So Omid Nouripour is knowingly and consciously lying.
somehistory says
The commands in the book of filth for mozlums are **not** Laws. They are **Unlawful** commands.
Everything in the book mozlums follow, worship, and for what they commit rape and murder, is lawless as it all goes against the Laws of Creation, the Laws of Nature, and, the Laws of moral man.
But, everywhere mozlums have been allowed…even **welcomed** with open arms as in Germany, they are getting into the governments and making changes that allow these hideous, lawless, evil commands, to become part of the authority over the life of the average person.
mozlums don’t just want to live under their evil brutality; they want everyone on earth to be subjugated to it, like it or not. Germans should kick this mozlum creep to the curb.
Just as the U.S. should kick i.elmi, aliais i.omar, r. tlaib, k. ellison, etc., and London should kick the khan to the curb.
mortimer says
SH … Your surmisals are wild guesses. The dictates of the Koran are DECREES of Allah, which are Allah’s laws. So you are wrong and you should stop making such comments which expose the counter-jihad to ridicule.
Some of us (unlike you) have made a lengthy and laborious study of Islam and know whereof we speak. Please learn something about Islam and verify before commenting spontaneously. What you are doing is just plain foolish.
somehistory says
I must go to see my uncle Bob. He has a horse farm and cattle ranch and uses an industrial “Pests Be Gone.” I need some, pronto.
You, mortimer, are, in my opinion, an idiot A fake “god” and a false “prophet” cannot make “Laws.” Everything written in your book of filth is from satan and therefore, totally lawless.
I, unlike you, have been able to see the evil of islam without being a devout mozlum and making a pretense of having left the cult of satan.
If I ever….which I will not….listen to you, “mortimer”…I hope someone shoots me.
Infidel says
Somehistory
Sometimes, your rejoinders to ‘Mortimer’ are the most entertaining posts on this site 😈😂 Somehow, he reminds me of Eeyore from ‘Winnie the Pooh’ – takes somebody’s pithy post, and puts in a totally unintelligible response to it
somehistory says
Why, thank you very much, Infidel.
He never actually says how I am wrong….just that I am, as though, he is a resident expert and I am a fool for doubting him.
I don’t feel the need to eat animal droppings in order to be sure I would get no benefit. Yet, on that, he insists.
Thanks, again.
gravenimage says
Mortimer, how is Somehistory wrong? She is in fact *quite right* that Islam calls for the subjugation of everyone to its diktats. You have in fact noted this yourself.
Then, you say that Islamic laws are the decrees of Allah–but this is what Muslims believe. Non-Muslims *do not* believe that the horrors of Shari’ah are divinely inspired. Most of the time it seems that you do not believe this either.
I know you regularly go after Somehistory, calling her opposition to the horrors of Islam ridiculous and foolish. I’m just not sure why.
somehistory says
🙂 🙂
PRCS says
And I am not sure why she believes Mortimer is a Muslim.
“You, mortimer, are, in my opinion, an idiot A fake “god” and a false “prophet” cannot make “Laws.” Everything written in your book of filth is from satan and therefore, totally lawless.
I, unlike you, have been able to see the evil of islam without being a devout mozlum and making a pretense of having left the cult of satan.”
Are you a Muslim, Mortimer?
James Lincoln says
gravenimage,
I read somehistory’s post – twice.
I could find nothing in it that was factually incorrect.
somehistory says
Thank you, James.
PRCS says
James,
somehistory was wrong to say,
“The commands in the book of filth for [mozlums] are **not** Laws. They are **Unlawful** commands.
For Muslims, they are, because that’s what they believe.
What WE think about Islam is irrelevant to THEM.
James Lincoln says
PRCS,
I was thinking of the traditional definition of “law” as what exists in the local, state, and federal governments of United States.
But I do see your point.
PRCS says
Thanks for the response, James.
The best we can do, the least, is to prevent Islamic law from taking further root in U.S. law.
Complying with demands for prayer time during work hours and not removing a Muslim woman’s hijab while being arrested are examples of the camel’s having already gotten under the tent.
somehistory says
James,
The “traditional” Law is the opposite of what mozlum countries implement.
If one is allowed…even commanded…to rape, to murder those who refuse to be raped, to murder those who are found to be raped and complain, or like the little 5 year old girl being kidnapped and raped by a “stranger”, and murdered by her parents because she was no longer an “honor” to them; to be imprisoned and raped before death, that is not “law.”
I don’t allow myself to see that just because another country allows such barbarity, I should think of that barbarity as “law.”
It isn’t law, no matter what insane argument is made due to other nations having islam as their code of acceptable behavior.
We must stick with what is “traditional” Law, even knowing that many nations follow the devilish opposite and call it “law.”
PRCS says
The “traditional law” for Muslims has been Islamic law for about 14 centuries.
The Aztecs and so many others–throughout history and around the world–had their “traditional law”, too. The list is long.
You remain, simply, wrong.
gravenimage says
Agreed, James.
PRCS says
“They are **Unlawful** commands.”
That is **untrue** in Saudi Arabia, Aceh, Iran, the Southern Philippines, Brunei, Afghanistan, Northern Nigeria…..
Infidel says
PRCS
This part of what she wrote was definitely correct:
Nowhere was there any mention of Christianity or the Bible, so I don’t see any reason for you to get your knickers in a twist. And Mortimer’s attack on her was ad-hominem, and this is the same guy who often posts that muslims will leave islam when convinced that the quran is of human origin or that we ought to send back our troops to liberate Afghanistan so that they can discard islam. So everyone is well justified in having doubts about his sanity
PRCS says
“They are **Unlawful** commands.”
That is **untrue** in Saudi Arabia, Aceh, Iran, the Southern Philippines, Brunei, Afghanistan, Northern Nigeria…..
That’s all I addressed Capice?
somehistory says
Thank you, Infidel.
somehistory says
Jesus Christ said, “Do to others as you wish to be done to you.”
If this command by Jesus was followed as a general rule by the vast majority of mankind, the lawlessness of islam would be ever so apparent when some mozlum tried to say it was “compatible.”
Doomer says
Not surprising considering the new German government is a LEFTIST one.
Germany has the strongest economy in Europe.
1. Now that Leftists are in power,Muslims are happy. Germany’s economy will be destroyed. Making it easier to submit to Islam.
2. And the JEWS of Germany will suffer,and nobody,except for a few,will care.
Historians are divided about WHEN Hitler made the decision to kill all the Jews,there are the Functionalists and the Intentionalists.
The intentionalists say Hitler planned to kill all the Jews in the world, from maybe as early as 1918.
born saturday says
they have enforced sharia laws including children weddings from the age of ten in many european countries already through the EU the germans already before their new government that is bount to be even more treacherous than the previous….
traitors!!!
gravenimage says
Certainly, many European nations have been disturbngly enabling of Islam–but I have *not* seen Germany or other EU nations legalize child marriage on their soil. Do you have citations?
In fact, Germany specifically passed a law in 2017 dedicated to fighting child marriage there. Are you saying this has been overturned?
Clive Delmonte says
There is no limit to the stupidity of political leaders.
At least the UK has no monopoly here!
Infidel says
Precisely: stupidity is like
the ChinavirusCOVID 1984 – plenty of it to go around the worldGraham Bryant says
Very true mortimer it is obvious. same with the ‘racist” and “islamiphobe” accusation they are simply not true yet upheld by the stupid and insipid(and wicked) judges and judiciary and politicians(that means most Germans who are not muslim)
Graham Bryant says
This EVIL muslim bastard should be removed simple as that. islam is promoting an idol god(allah of the quran) which is against the great creator the LORD GOD ALMIGHTY of the BIBLE- He it is that our the true creator of us all. So all islam shall be dealt with in his wrath soon to come-they shall not escape!!
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
The text of this article differ from the text of the linked-to article
https://rmx.news/trending/new-leader-of-germanys-greens-said-that-parts-of-sharia-law-are-compatible-with-countrys-constitution/
The original linked-to article says:
Nouripour responded: “There are many types of Sharia. Our job here is to ensure that the parts that are compatible with the Basic Law [Grundgesetz, the German constitution] can also be applied. But there are numerous types of Sharia, and I wonder what type he is referring to. Do you know what you’re talking about? And the second question is: The history of Islam is a very long history of possible interpretations, and up to the end of the 19th century there was always a sentence under every expert opinion that said, ‘But nobody really knows except the God of the believers’.”
The article here says:
Nouripoor responded: “There are many types of Sharia on the way [on the way to where?]. Our job here is to ensure that the parts that are compatible with the Basic Law can also be applied. And they don’t, just not. But there are numerous types of Sharia. I wonder if he means the Reclam edition when he says Sharia. Do you know what he’s talking about? And the second question is: The history of Islam is a very long history of possible interpretations, and up to the end of the 19th century there was always a sentence under every expert opinion that said, ‘But how it really is, no one knows, only they do [bad grammar?] God of believers’.”
“Reclam” is a reference to the German publisher
https://www.reclam.de/service/english_information
Does the edition of Sharia (the Quran) published by Reclam differ from the text used by the ulema of Islamic scholars? That’s NEWS! Let’s have the chapter-and-verse details. Whose version is better?
PRCS says
I noted that, too.
Don’t know the answer.
gravenimage says
Germany: New Green Party top dog says some parts of Sharia are compatible with German constitution
……………
As noted, Omid Nouripour does not say here what parts of Sharia are compatible with civilized German law.
And his claim that there are many interpretations of Sharia is misleading at best. Some parts of Dar-al-Islam have imposed the full horror of Sharia, some bits and pieces–but the nature of Sharia itself *does not change*. And there is *always* pressure, sometimes violent, from pious Muslims for a more comprehensive imposition of Sharia.
Best to never allow that camel’s nose under the tent to begin with.
Omid Nouripour also holds Iranian citizenship–when questioned about this, he railed against “loyalty paranoia” in a speech in the Bundestag (note that he *did not* actually say he was loyal to Germany). He hates Israel. He hates the AfD, who have tried to protect Germany against Jihad terror.
He has said that Germany has “huge potential”–he appearently doesn’;t think much of her civilized laws now. He has said that people who dare oppose his views “can legally be described as Nazis”. *Deeply* disturbing stuff.
He also has no real affinity for the values of the Green Party (I have some issues with some of its sillier aspects myself, but I am not running the party). When asked why he joined the Greens, he has just said it’s because no one there aksed him what country he came from.
Most disturbingly, he lies about Jihad, saying that Jihad terror has little to do with Islam. He claims that the “War on Terror” created Jihad terrorism–completely ignoring 9/11 and all the Islamic terror which preceded it. He blames Germany for Jihad for daring to have defended against Jihad. He wrote a book spouting this Taqiyya.
Infidel says
He probably thought that the Green Party was named after one of the sacred colors of islam, and joined it for that reason
gravenimage says
Ha ha
andra says
The Greenies in Germany definitely think that, too.
PRCS says
“…his claim that there are many interpretations of Sharia…”
The response to that all too common tap-dance should always be:
We must also accept, then, that the Taliban’s interpretation is just another of so many.
Of course, he already knows that.
gravenimage says
More on Omid Nouripour–he has lauded Iran as the “protector of the Shia” despite their crushing the rights of their own citizens, and has urged Germany to enable a nuclear Iran. He has vehemently opposed characterizing Hezb’allah as a terrorist organization. Unsurprisingly, he is also pro-BDS.
tim gallagher says
Islam and Sharia law are barbaric, primitive loads of uncivilised garbage, so, if the German constitution does have anything that finds Sharia acceptable, then the Germans had better change their constitution because it is plainly very flawed. This German Greens (the far left mob of loons in all our western countries) character is displaying that unholy alliance between the Left and barbaric Islam yet again. Both loathe our liberal democratic way of life and are out to destroy it.
andra says
Omid Nouripour has alwasys been a friend of implanting Sharia into German society. Some years ago he demanded from the Christians to implant Muslim rites into Christmas mass. He has mever demanded Islam to implant any Christian rites into Ramadan.
By the way, under Trump he was not allowed to enter the US, because he has an Iranian passport besides the German one.
He has been dangerous for Germany for a long time, but the Greenies just love that because they hate Germany as much .
gravenimage says
Appalling, Andra–thanks for that information.
And good to see you posting again.
JCA Reid says
Fascism/Totalitarianism is alive & well in Germany. Making a comeback I see. Utterly disgraceful.
andra says
1. You should have a closer look at who are the fascists in Germany: e.g Mr. Nouripour.
2. At the moment hundreds of thousands of Germans are protesting against the very fascistic Gorona-regime in Germany, because they do not want Fascism to come back.
OLD GUY says
The people of Germany have been down this road before, you would think they would see the train wreck coming. Will the sheep just follow this Sheppard over the cliff? Or will the average citizen stop the political leaders before it is too late? Same question for the rest of the free west, we seen this before in the late 1930’s and the huge price we paid in lives to shut Hitlers ideology down. Let’s not repeat!
David Foot says
What German law is he talking about? WHEN?
The European Council found that Sharia is incompatible with its law 2016/18
The UK House of Lords 2008 found that Sharia is incompatible with English Law
What is this guy talking about?
Infidel says
Probably the laws of the Third Reich?
gravenimage says
Taqiyya.
PRCS says
The “traditional law” for Muslims has been Islamic law for about 14 centuries.
The Aztecs and so many others–throughout history and around the world–had their “traditional law”, too. The list is long.
You remain, simply, wrong.