Genotoxic effects of electromagnetic field radiations from mobile phones
Introduction
The first wireless communication (WC) came into existence in the year 1899 when Guglielmo Marconi sent a telegraphic message from a ship docked at New York Harbor to the Twin Lights in Highlands, New Jersey. Since then, telecommunication has advanced rapidly due to many new inventions that enabled wire-free communications, such as mobile telephony (MT) and the Internet as we know it today. The first commercially available mobile phone was launched in October 1983 since then the MT has accelerated rapidly with the addition of new features over time. The twenty-first century can be regarded as the age of cell/mobile phones (Bento, 2016; Harris and Cooper, 2019). Mobile phone use has increased tremendously in the past twelve years globally, reaching a level approximately 1.5 times greater than the global population at the time of writing this article. It is predicted that the number of mobile phones will continue to grow in the coming years. (Source: https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/how-many-phones-are-in-the-world). Mobile phones act as a two-way radio i.e., they can receive and send information (calls, messages, images, videos, emails and allow internet access). This is made possible by the use of wireless technology involving electromagnetic field (EMF) and electromagnetic radiation (EMR) waves (Aly and Crum, 2016; Zothansiama et al., 2017).
EMFs in the form of EMR are self-propagating radiation generated due to the movement of charged particles. EMRs consist of both electrical and magnetic components that oscillate normally (at 90°) in the direction of wave propagation. EMR can travel in air different media and vacuum. The EMFs/EMR are of two types 1. Ionizing radiation with a wavelength range of 10 to 10−4 nm and a frequency range of 1016–1024 Hz and 2. The non-ionizing radiations, which have a wavelength between 1 mm and 100 km and a frequency range from 3 kHz to 300 GHz (Norgard and Best, 2020). The EMFs/EMRs used by WC technology have the “pulsed” character and may pose an additional risk even if the exposures are well below the limit set by the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (ICNIRP, 1998, 2020; Martynyuk et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2019). Manmade EMFs/EMRs are generated by microwave ovens, mobile phones, mobile tower antennas, radars, radio/television stations, electric power stations, and various commonly used electronic devices including those, which are used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. MT uses radiofrequency (RF) carrier waves with wavelengths between 1 mm and 100 km and frequencies from 3 kHz to 300 GHz and traveling at the speed of light (Joshi and Kumar 2003; Kelsh et al., 2011; Buckus et al., 2017).
Human exposure to manmade EMF/EMR depends on the density of base stations/square kilometer, the distance between two base stations, the amount of power transmitted by the base stations, the number of cell phones/km2, and call traffic. There are typically more base stations per square kilometer in cities due to greater population density/km2 and a large number of users to service. The power density (PD) of EMR is low just near the base stations (1000 μW/cm2) and is 10–100 μW/cm2 at 100 m from the base stations and decreases linearly with distance thereafter. However, this may not be possible in the cities where mobile towers are closely located (Haumann et al., 2002; Aly and Crum, 2016; Marinescu and Poparlan, 2016).
MT uses mainly 2nd generation Global System for mobile communication digital technology (GSM) that employs TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) system and 3G/4G Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) that uses CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) pulsing/modulation system. Carrier frequencies range between 900 and 2200 MHz, with pulsations at 8 and 217 Hz (GSM) or 100 and 150 Hz (UMTS). In addition to MT, other sources of WC-EMFs are domestic cordless phones (DECT: digital enhanced cordless telecommunications), and internet wireless connection (Wi-Fi: wireless fidelity). All these technologies utilize combine RF carrier signals with extremely low frequency (ELF: 0–3000 Hz) pulsations and modulation (Pedersen, 1997). In addition to mobile phones, human exposure to manmade EMFs/EMRs arises from electrical lines, transmission towers, 5th generation technology (5G), diagnostic, therapeutic, and other electronic devices that have added an extra burden to the electromagnetic pollution of the global environment (Gosselin et al., 2013; Panagopoulos, 2019a; Moon, 2020; Paolucci et al., 2020; López et al., 2021).
All manmade EMFs are coherent and polarized and pose a greater risk to human health due to their ability to disrupt the electrochemical homeostasis in the cells than natural EMFs emanating from the sun, the cosmos, geomagnetic/geoelectric fields, atmospheric oscillations, and other sources (Wolf, 2003; Geffrin et al., 2012; Panagopoulos et al., 2015; Pall, 2021).
The increased use of cell phones for extended durations, and the installation of MT base antennas/towers for communication, have raised concerns about potential health risks to humans as electromagnetic emissions may put an additional burden on the environment beyond several other types of pollution humans are exposed daily such as air and ware pollution, chemicals, pesticides etc. As early as 2000/2001 mobile phone users and individuals residing close to MT base antennas/towers complained of different non-specific symptoms like headache, fatigue, tinnitus, concentration problems, depression, memory impairment, skin irritation, cognitive function, cardiovascular effects, and hormonal disorders. The term “microwave sickness”/“Electrohypersensitivity” has been coined to describe these symptoms as a consequence of WC-EMF exposures (Augner et al., 2009; Yakymenko et al., 2016; Deniz et al., 2017).
Apart from the above WC-EMF exposures cause tactile hallucinations, dry eyes, De Quervain's tenosynovitis, nomophobia, computer vision syndrome, weakness in thumbs, rigidity of hands, and wrist, stiff neck, insomnia insecurity, delusions, auditory and sleep disturbances, insomnia, hallucinations, reduced self-confidence, anxiety, stress, and mobile phone addiction disorders (Parasuraman et al., 2017; Amjad et al., 2020; Al-Khlaiwi et al., 2020). All of these effects occurred without increasing tissue temperature.
The short-term effects of WC-EMF exposure include muscle and nerve stimulation, shock or burn after touching conducting objects. The absorption of EMF energy leads to a rise in tissue temperatures, which is known as the thermal effect (Van Leeuwen et al., 1999; Wainwright, 2000; Dilli, 2021). However, most of the manmade WC-EMF exposures at environmentally relevant levels are non-thermal as they do not induce any tissue heating (Goodman et al., 1995; Israel et al., 2013; Wust et al., 2021). WC-EMF exposures cause alteration in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier, immunity system, and changes in cell membrane fidelity due to flow of current (Aly and Crum, 2016). The MT increased the activation of HSP27 and p38MAPKinase in EA. hy926 cells and rat brain and stabilization of endothelial stress fibers indicating that it changes the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (Leszczynski et al., 2002; Kesari et al., 2014). These studies confirm that WC-EMF exposure is not safe for humans.
The report of WC-EMF on adverse effects of human health are with mixed results. Many studies report the negative effects of WC-EMF exposure on human health as epidemiological studies are insufficient to prove the adverse effect on human health. This may be due to rapidly changing mobile technology and the research on the adverse effects of WC-EMF exposure on human health is unable to keep pace with the fast-changing mobile technology (Russell, 2018). However, studies with the adverse effects of WC-EMF exposure on human health are numerous and outnumber the negative reports. These investigations indicate that WC-EMF radiation has adverse health effects on humans/animals (Yakymenko et al., 2016).
The time taken by the human cells to respond to WC-EMF arising from mobile phones and mobile tower stations/antennas is approximately 2.5 min indicating the health risk posed by radiofrequency radiation to humans is real (Hardell et al., 2002). A study conducted in Sweden between 2007 and 2009 in humans of either sex between the age of 18–75 years revealed an increased risk of malignant brain tumors and ipsilateral use was associated with a higher risk of tumors than contralateral mobile and cordless phone use. The use of the mobile phone for 30 min/day for 8–10 h/day by an individual has a double to quadruple risk of brain tumors (Hardell et al., 2013; Miller et al., 2019). The incidence of neuroepithelial brain tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults in the age group from birth to 24 years has increased between 2010 and 2017 in the USA. The glioblastoma multiforme increased among all ages in the UK, whereas pituitary tumors and schwannoma (nerve sheath tumors) in the age group of 20–85 years (Miller et al., 2019; Pareja-Peña et al., 2020). This indicates that there is a close relationship between WC-EMF exposure and the induction of brain tumors.
Exposure of pregnant rats on gestation day (GD) 7 and 14 to 1800 MHz EMF-RF (SAR 0.048 W/kg) for 2 h/day reduced the number of live embryos and increased the number of dead and resorbed embryos and hematoma, malformed, and edematous fetuses. The exposure on 20th GD resulted in congestion, hematoma, malformation, short tail, and growth retardation, and reduced glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in the pregnant rat serum receiving EMF-RF for 14 and 20 days (Alchalabi et al., 2016). The exposure of mouse follicles to WC-EMF reduced the developmental capacity of the follicles in vitro (Cecconi et al., 2000). Rats exposed to EMF-ELF to 30 Hz (4 kA/m) sinusoidal magnetic field for 2 h/day for 10 weeks led to the alleviation in the follicle stimulating hormone in the proestrus and progesterone in the estrus phase and defect in the structure and function of the ovaries (Alekperov et al., 2019).
The exposure of WC-EMF from mobile phones and mobile base stations has increased spontaneous abortions in pregnant women and also the pregnant women exposed to EMF-RF (SAR 1.07–1.16 W/kg) gave birth to boys (5%) with low birth weights (Mahmoudabadi et al., 2015). The use of mobile phones for more than half our/day reduced fetal growth and infant birth weight (Lu et al., 2017; Ren et al., 2019; Boileau et al., 2020). An epidemiological study of 55 507 pregnant women who used cell phones in Denmark, Netherlands Spain, and South Korea showed an association between preterm delivery and cell phone use (Tsarna et al., 2019).
Excessive exposure to WC- EMF for a longer duration adversely affected male and female reproduction (Dilli, 2021). The exposure of human semen samples to 800 MHz EMF-RF < 1 W or 0.001–2000 μW/cm2 from a laptop reduced semen quality, sperm motility, and viability (Erogul et al., 2006; Avendaño et al., 2012; Okechukwu, 2020). However, a recent study conducted in Denmark (751) and the USA (2349) on human volunteers who kept their mobile phones in their pant pockets did not find any adverse effect on semen quality (Hatch et al., 2021).
The 900 MHz exposure from mobile phones at a SAR of 2 W/kg reduced the fertilizing capability of the rat sperms (Yan et al., 2007). Exposure of rats to 200 MHz pulse-modulated WC-EMF (PD 50 W/m2) for 1 h/day for 30 days decreased sperm quality, reduced serum testosterone, and increased Bax/Bcl2 ratio, cleaved caspase 3 and caspase 3 in testis (Guo et al., 2019). The review aims to make the reader aware of the adverse effects of manmade WC-EMF, whose consistent use causes mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and cancer. The genotoxic effects of WC-EMF on humans and mammalian preclinical models are only reviewed here.
Section snippets
The studies with no genotoxic effects
Table 1 lists a summary of various investigations that did not find genotoxicity in various mammalian systems.
The studies with genotoxic effects
The studies indicating that WC-EMF induces genotoxicity in various human/mammalian systems are depicted in Table 2.
Conclusions
The electromagnetic radiations especially in the radiofrequency range are long wavelength radiation and they have wide application in wireless communication. The human exposure to manmade WC-EMF is from electrical transmission lines, mobile signal transmission towers/antennas, mobile phones, microwaves, and various commonly used electronic devices. Mobile phone subscriptions continue to proliferate, causing a dramatic increase in WC-EMF exposure of children and adults equally. Various agencies
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The author is thankful to his wife Mrs. Mangla Jagetia for her constant support and patience during the writing of this manuscript. I acknowledge the financial grant received from the University Grant's Commission, India vide grant No. F4-10/2010(BSR).
References (280)
- et al.
Different periods of intrauterine exposure to electromagnetic field: influence on female rats' fertility, prenatal and postnatal development
Asian Pac. J. Reprod.
(2016) - et al.
Micronuclei formation and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine enzyme detection in ovarian tissues after radiofrequency exposure at 1800 Mhz in adult Sprague Dawley rats
HAYATI J. Biosci.
(2017) - et al.
Effects of subchronic exposure to static magnetic field on testicular function in rats
Arch. Med. Res.
(2006) - et al.
Effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human lymphocytes in vitro
Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen
(1997) - et al.
Cytological effects of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on human lymphocytes in vitro
Mutat. Res. Lett.
(1995) Assessment of radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation by the micronucleus test in bovine peripheral erythrocytes
Sci. Total Environ.
(1996)Calling for change? Innovation, diffusion, and the energy impacts of global mobile telephony
Energy Res. Social Sci.
(2016)- et al.
Mobile phone use during pregnancy: which association with fetal growth?
J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod.
(2020) - et al.
Genotoxic effects of intermediate frequency magnetic fields on blood leukocytes in vitro
Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen
(2019) - et al.
DNA and chromosomal damage in response to intermittent extremely low-frequency magnetic fields
Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen
(2009)
Reactive oxygen species levels and DNA fragmentation on astrocytes in primary culture after acute exposure to low intensity microwave electromagnetic field
Neurosci. Lett.
Is mobile phone radiation genotoxic? An analysis of micronucleus frequency in exfoliated buccal cells
Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen
Effects of short and long term electromagnetic fields exposure on the human hippocampus
J. Microsc. Ultrastruct.
Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro
Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen
Genotoxic hazard evaluation in welders occupationally exposed to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF)
Int. J. Hyg Environ. Health
Cytogenetic effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on Wistar rat bone marrow
Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen
Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: an in vitro study
Arch. Med. Res.
Mutagenic and morphologic impacts of 1.8 GHz radiofrequency radiation on human peripheral blood lymphocytes (hPBLs) and possible protective role of pre-treatment with Ginkgo biloba (EGb 761)
Sci. Total Environ.
Ultra high frequency-electromagnetic field irradiation during pregnancy leads to an increase in erythrocytes micronuclei incidence in rat offspring
Life Sci.
DNA fragmentation in human fibroblasts under extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure
Mutat. Res. Fund Mol. Mech. Mutagen
X-rays, microwaves and vinyl chloride monomer: their clastogenic and aneugenic activity, using the micronucleus assay on human lymphocytes
Mutat. Res. Lett.
Micronucleus assay and lymphocyte mitotic activity in risk assessment of occupational exposure to microwave radiation
Chemosphere
The correlation between the frequency of micronuclei and specific chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes exposed to microwave radiation in vitro
Mutat. Res. Lett.
The effect of microwave radiation on the cell genome
Mutat. Res. Lett.
The relationship between colony-forming ability, chromosome aberrations and incidence of micronuclei in V79 Chinese hamster cells exposed to microwave radiation
Mutat. Res. Lett.
Effects of electromagnetic fields on molecules and cells
Int. Rev. Cytol.
Effects of different mobile phone UMTS signals on DNA, apoptosis and oxidative stress in human lymphocytes
Environ. Pollut.
The effect of prenatal exposure to 900-MHz electromagnetic field on the 21-old-day rat testicle
Reprod. Toxicol.
Micronucleus frequency in buccal mucosa cells of mobile phone users
Toxicol. Lett.
Extended exposure of adult and fetal mice to 50 Hz magnetic field does not increase the incidence of micronuclei in erythrocytes
Bioelectromagnetics
Comet assay to evaluate DNA damage caused by magnetic fields
Proc. Int. Conf. Electromagn. Interf. Compat.
In vitro effects of low-level, low-frequency electromagnetic fields on DNA damage in human leucocytes by comet assay
Indian J. Biochem. Biophys.
Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline
Int. J. Androl.
Effects of extremely low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (ELF-PEMFs) on glioblastoma cells (U87)
Electromagn. Biol. Med.
Exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields emitted from mobile phones induced DNA damage in human ear canal hair follicle cells
Electromagn. Biol. Med.
The association of smart mobile phone usage with cognitive function impairment in Saudi adult population
Pakistan J. Med. Sci.
Mobile phone specific electromagnetic fields induce transient DNA damage and nucleotide excision repair in serum-deprived human glioblastoma cells
PLoS One
Assessment of genetic damage in peripheral blood of human volunteers exposed (whole-body) to a 200 T, 60Hz magnetic field
Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
Effect of long-term 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on the micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes of mice
Electromagn. Biol. Med.
The effect of electromagnetic fields of extremely low frequency 30 Hz on rat ovaries
Bull. Exp. Biol. Med.
Effects of low-intensity microwave radiation on oxidant-antioxidant parameters and DNA damage in the liver of rats
Bioelectromagnetics
Effect of 900-, 1800-, and 2100-MHz radiofrequency radiation on DNA and oxidative stress in brain
Electromagn. Biol. Med.
Research review for possible relation between mobile phone radiation and brain tumor
Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci.
Frequency of wrist pain and its associated risk factors in students using mobile phones
Pakistan J. Med. Sci.
GSM base stations: short-term effects on well-being
Bioelectromagnetics
Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation
Fertil. Steril.
Genotoxic effects of low 2.45 GHz microwave radiation exposures on Sprague Dawley rats
Int. J. Genet. Mol. Biol.
Analysis of the genotoxic effects of mobile phone radiation using buccal micronucleus assay: a comparative evaluation
J. Clin. Diagn. Res.
Analysis of structural chromosome changes and SCE after occupational long-term exposure to electric and magnetic fields from 380 kV-systems
Radiat. Environ. Biophys.
915 MHz microwaves and 50 Hz magnetic field affect chromatin conformation and 53BP1 foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons
Bioelectromagnetics
Cited by (15)
Cancer as a global health crisis with deep evolutionary roots
2024, Global TransitionsInhibition of mitochondrial calcium uptake by Ru360 enhances the effect of 1800 MHz radio-frequency electromagnetic fields on DNA damage
2023, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- 1
Formerly at the Department of Zoology, Cancer and Radiation Biology Laboratory, Mizoram University, Aizawl-796 004, India.