Did this have anything to do with the fact that this woman is Hindu? The possibility cannot be discounted. The life of a non-Muslim is worth less than that of a Muslim, according to Islamic law. Reliance of the Traveller, a classic manual of Islamic sacred law, explains matter-of-factly that “the indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man. The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth that of a Muslim.” (o4.9)
“Pakistan horror: Newborn baby beheaded, head left inside Hindu woman’s womb by govt hospital staff in Sindh province,” OpIndia, June 21, 2022:
On Sunday, June 19, the staff of the government-run Rural health centre (RHC) in the Sindh province in Pakistan reportedly cut off a newborn baby’s head and left the severed head in the mother’s womb, putting the woman’s life in jeopardy.
The woman was identified as 32-year-old Hindu woman from Bheel community. She was rushed to a neighbouring hospital in Mithi, but there were no medical facilities available to treat her. Her family eventually took her to Jamshoro’s Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), where the newborn’s severed head was removed from the mother’s womb, saving her life….
In a botched procedure on Sunday, a RHC staff cut off the unborn baby’s head and left it in the mother’s womb, he added.
Sikandar further informed the baby’s head was entrapped inside and the mother’s uterus had been ruptured and they had to open up her abdomen surgically and take out the head to save her life.
Pakistan government orders inquiry after reports goes viral
Only after the news of the horrifying incident went viral did the Pakistani government intervene and directed authorities to form a medical investigation board to investigate the tragedy and find the perpetrators….
Dr Juman Bahoto added that the inquiry panel will also examine reports that stated that some hospital staff took pictures and shot videos of the woman while she was lying on a stretcher fighting for her life. “Apparently, some members of the staff took her photos on a mobile phone in the gynaecology ward and shared those pictures with different WhatsApp groups,” Juman added.
SKA says
But according to the Muslim doctrine of “reversion” based on the tafsir of the Alastu bi-Rabbikum (“Am I not your Lord?”) verse the unborn child was already a Muslim so they murdered a fellow Muslim. Of course Muslim moral casuistry will justify any horrific act committed by Muslims motivated by “good intentions!”
raja says
SKA,
Some koranic passages are too contradictory not be noticed by anybody. Islamists have been managing these contradiction for far too long. It is in this internet age that we are provided all the details of contradictions on the table. The world is too scared to confront the Islamic supremacists. It possibly lacks the convictions too.
SKA says
Well stated, Raja!
somehistory says
+100
mortimer says
SKA’s comment is both learned and cogent. The casuistry of Islam is based on Islam’s underlying ETHOS of the HONOR/SHAME paradigm. If Muslims are to receive the HONOR, then the religious ‘others’ must receive the SHAME.
Sharia law is the key piece in Islam. Sharia is not an ethics-based system of law, but an HONOR-based system. Whatever brings HONOR to Islam or SHAME to the non-Muslim is ‘HALAL’ and justifiable. No HONOR must be given to KAFIRS.
– from Sufi scholar Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624): “The honour of Islam lies in INSULTING kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to HUMILIATE them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain TERRIFIED and TREMBLING. It is intended to hold them under CONTEMPT and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”
– from ibn Taymiyya, “Book of Emaan”: “… true believers show ANIMOSITY and HATRED towards disbelievers and NEVER support them.”
– K. 28:86 says: “Lend not thou support in any way to those who reject Allah’s Message.”
SKA says
Dear Mortimer:
Your comment on the honor/shame model really does explain a lot. But the quotation from the Sufi also puts to rest the naive Western notion of Sufism being this “kinder and more gentle” version of Islam!
mgoldberg says
the 18th century Moroccan Sufi “master” Ibn Ajibah from his Koranic commentary. Describing unabashedly the purpose of the humiliating Koranic poll tax [6] (as per Koran 9:29 [6]) of submission for non-Muslims brought under Islamic hegemony by jihad, Ibn Ajibah makes clear the ultimate goal of its imposition was to achieve what he called the death of the “soul”, through the dhimmi’s execution of their own humanity:
[The dhimmi] is commanded to put his soul, good fortune and desires to death. Above all he should kill the love of life, leadership and honor. [The dhimmi] is to invert the longings of his soul, he is to load it down more heavily than it can bear until it is completely submissive. Thereafter nothing will be unbearable for him. He will be indifferent to subjugation or might. Poverty and wealth will be the same to him; praise and insult will be the same; preventing and yielding will be the same; lost and found will be the same. Then, when all things are the same, it [the soul] will be submissive and yield willingly what it should give. [Tafsir ibn ‘Ajibah. Commentary on Q9:29. Ahmad ibn Muhammad Ibn ‘Ajibah]
gravenimage says
Yes–Sufis are still pro-Jihad.
SKA says
Dear Gravenimage:
I was dismayed when a friend whom I consider very well informed and level headed felt the need to quote Idris Shah. I remember that this Sufi “master” published a book that consisted of nothing but blank pages: A nasty joke on his infidel groupies. I wrote him off as a complete charlatan but I am always amazed how many westerners are still conned by the Sufi sleigh of hand.
Infidel says
SKA
Logic is haram in islam. Never try to use logic to rationalize anything a muslim does
SKA says
Dear Infidel:
Logic.
Haram.
Got it, thank you.
maria says
It is so terrible and it shows that islam must be ended. It is the worst nazism,
mortimer says
The operation appears to have been a late term abortion in which the foetus was cut in pieces for removal. Doctors are supposed to put the pieces of dismembered foetus on a tray so they may verify that all pieces were removed. This was medical negligence that should result in a suspension of the doctor and a substantial fine..
gravenimage says
Actually, it’s unclear from this article *what* was supposed to happen here–it sounds like a cesarean section to me. But even the most inept surgeons don’t leave a baby’s *head* in the mother.
Infidel says
I dunno about Pakistan, but next door in India, cesareans are the defaults when women give birth: they’re not given epidurals or made to go through a vaginal delivery. If that’s the case in Pakistan, there’s no reason the baby’s head should have been cut, since it would have simply been a case of taking out the infant. Given the behavior of the others in recording this, I tend to suspect sabotage here
CheckBurry says
Sicko,s, unbelievably cruel. Can we have a few words from kahn the cricket please.
Also what swith this captcha thing iIclick and it goes blank, no post.
somehistory says
I’ve experienced the captcha going blank many times. I always must begin again to make the comment.
gravenimage says
If this happens–it’s happened to me, too–and you can’t proceed, use the arrow key at he upper left-hand corner and go back. In most cases your comment has been saved and you can try posting again.
Devasur says
Yet mainstream media pimps close their eyes to the genocide of Hindus and propagate fake genocide of Muslims in India. How inhuman and cruel can you be?
Infidel says
I’d put nothing past mohammedans in this department
Infidel says
Don’t women in that country normally have caesareans? How did they ‘accidentally’ manage this?
somehistory says
Ah, yes, an investigation into the demonic, depraved, diabolical deed done by the sons of satan. Since it happened, and since the woman knew where she was when it happened, and the perps took pics of and posted their evil, foul deed, what will the “investigation” prove and who will be held accountable for the murder of the poor baby?
My guess: no one will be held accountable. mozlums murder and get away with the murders every day of the week. Esp in places like pakistan where they learn how to copy their father in being murderers.
As Jesus Christ said, and Christians agree with Him, they “are from (their) father the devil and wish to do the desires of (their) father; that one was a murderer when he began and did not stand fast in the Truth.” “Snakes, offspring of vipers, how are you to flee from the Judgment of Gehenna?”
The poor baby. Never had a real chance in a country such as that. Evidently, everyone not towing the pakis’ evil line of serving satan with gusto, has a zero chance.
gravenimage says
Pakistan: Newborn baby beheaded, head left inside Hindu woman’s womb by government hospital staff
In a botched procedure on Sunday, a RHC staff cut off the unborn baby’s head and left it in the mother’s womb, he added.
……………………………….
I don’t believe it was botched. The standard of medical care is pretty poor in Pakistan, but you don’t accidentally behead a baby and then leave the head in the mother’s uterus so that it can rupture it.
More:
…the inquiry panel will also examine reports that stated that some hospital staff took pictures and shot videos of the woman while she was lying on a stretcher fighting for her life. “Apparently, some members of the staff took her photos on a mobile phone in the gynaecology ward and shared those pictures with different WhatsApp groups,” Juman added.
……………………………….
This mocking of the victim was hardly accidental, either.
I’ve heard of cases of Muslim hospitals in Pakistan refusing to treat Christian and Hindu patients–horrifying enough–but I’ve never heard of anything as horrifying as this. Just when you think Islam cannot get any worse…
GreekEmpress says
Thanks GI—I thought it was just me!