Market globalists, wokesters and jihadists have found allies in one another.
In May of this year, Audi posted a video on Twitter with the caption “At #EUDiversityMonth #Audi”. It had little to do with advertising the car itself. It was an advertisement for diversity, and of a very specific kind. A woman wearing a black hijab slowly raised the rainbow flag with her both hands. Once again: a Muslim woman in traditional Islamic clothing advertises the LGBT community. Considering how Muslims treat gays, lesbians and transgenders, this is comparable to the Nazis advertising kosher products, and the Stalinists advertising the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Nevertheless, this curiosity is a prime example of the direction in which the process of globalization is moving.
The idea of a “global village” with a global economy and cultures that complement and enrich each other has inspired mankind since ancient times. Alexander the Great was the first man who tried to put this idea into practice, having connected East and West. This was followed by countless attempts of a similar nature. From ancient Rome to Thomas More’s Utopia, Rosicrucians and Freemasons, from the Dutch East India Company and the Silk Road to the World Trade Organization, people constantly sought ways to implement this promising and mutually beneficial ideal.
At the beginning of the new millennium, America, with its openness and a strange combination of messianism, enterprise and naivety, became a conductor of the new world order, which was supposed to combine financial expediency, social justice and universal unification. These efforts can hardly be called successful. In 2008, Barack Obama introduced the Global Poverty Act to Senate, known as S2433. The United States, under the UN Millennium Development Goals, pledged to spend 0.7% of its gross national product on helping foreign countries reduce poverty and improve public health. This bill was not enacted.
World structures such as the UN and the WTO are not efficient, either. The influence of Hollywood and American corporations including Microsoft, Intel, AMD, Coca-Cola, Apple and McDonald’s, on social and political processes in the world is very superficial. Humanitarian aid is being plundered ruthlessly.
The situation has changed dramatically in the last decades. Three directions of globalization have formed before our eyes a phenomenon which the Austrian sociologist Manfred Steger defined as market globalism, justice globalism and jihad globalism.
At first glance, there is nothing in common between them. Moreover, they even look irreconcilable with each other. But first impressions are deceiving.
Financial elites have gained unlimited control over the world, subjugating and destroying national economies. Under the pretext of combating global warming, an energy crisis is artificially provoked; the agriculture of entire countries, such as the leading producers of agricultural products, like the Netherlands and Canada, is being destroyed.
With the advent of high-tech media such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc., market globalism has reached a qualitatively new level. Mark Zuckerberg’s February 2017 “Building Global Community” manifesto mirrored the narrative of social media globalization, just as Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto became a bible of the emerging communist movement. Social networks have entangled the whole world. The super high-tech giants need neither national borders, nor national manufacturers and consumers with specific cultural characteristics. On the contrary, they, like the financial elites, need faceless, wordless consumer plankton, omnivorous and formless, controlled and directed.
How can this “create a new man” project be implemented? Here comes the radical leftist, progressive “justice globalism” of wokesters. Progressives hate Western civilization. They are not going to reform it. They want to uproot it, with its traditions, culture, music, science, philosophy, and above all with its “Dead White European Males.” Through theories of “gender neutrality,” they destroy the very institution of the family, and doom their peoples to demographic and cultural degeneration. Through the mass migration from Third World countries, they carry out an ethnic replacement. Through pseudo-Marxist concepts such as cancel culture, political identity and Critical Race Theory, they promote the superiority of the marginalized communities that hate the rule of law and generally accepted norms. Like the Bolsheviks, they strive to create a “new man” – a man without moral restrictions and ethical values, extremely infantile and incapable of critical thinking. Such person would be an ideal type of consumer.
That being said, no society can exist in the atmosphere of total anarchy without laws, order and rules. Such a society will stop consuming and will simply destroy itself. This is where jihadist globalism enters the scene.
Jihadist globalism craves for the creation of the worldwide caliphate, where a “perfect” society lives according to Sharia law without any initiative, individualism or rationalism. The Islamists’ globalist model is extremely convenient for financiers and high-tech giants. By establishing strict social norms within the framework of Sharia law, the Islamists on one hand restrain the destructive forces of society, and on the other hand allow obedient “plankton” to consume freely in all spheres of life (except for specific goods, such as alcohol products). By means of smart gadgets and harsh repression, Islamic globalists can successfully control the whole population and keep it within the framework of an organized community. As a result, instead of a developed, civilized and truly democratic society, we get a giant obedient consumer herd – a Western-Islamic version of the Chinese totalitarian society, which is so admired by the globalist Western elite.
What will be the fate of the marginal and wokesters? It will be sad, of course. But most likely, consciously or unconsciously, they are willing to return to their usual role of submissive and hunted pariahs, since they do not know how and do not want to enjoy the benefits of true freedom.
This alliance of the three branches of globalism explains the phenomenon that seems inexplicable: the sympathy of the American progressive and globalist establishment for the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and Iran, the systems that are by definition hostile to Western democracy and its values. After being elected for the second term, Obama, who did not hide his connection with Islam, bet not on Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Israel (as one might expect), but…on Turkey, Egypt and Iran. Turkey is governed by the Justice and Development Party of Erdogan, a branch of the MB. Egypt at that time was also ruled by the MB headed by Mohamed Mursi. It should be noted that the Shiite Iranian theocracy is on friendly terms with the MB. Iran supported Egypt’s former Muslim Brotherhood president, Mohamed Morsi, not to mention Hamas, the Palestinian branch of the MB, and also successfully cooperated with Turkey. Obama’s first landmark voyage was to Turkey in April 2009 (in contrast, Trump chose Saudi Arabia and Israel). Obama’s first main foreign policy speech was delivered in Cairo, where Islamists came to power very soon with the open support of the White House. He refused to use “anti-Muslim” terminology such as “war on terror.” Obama’s main foreign policy mission (like that of the Biden-Harris administration) was appeasement of Iran. Both Obama and John Kerry supported Qatar in its conflict with the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. Qatar, as we know, is an ally of the MB, Turkey and Iran.
The Biden administration copies this course precisely. The US officially appointed Qatar as a strategic partner and major non-NATO ally.
The acceptance of the jihadist globalism model by the globalist and progressive elite explains many other things that seem inexplicable at first: “special favorable terms” for Muslim migrants (but not for genuine refugees – Christians and Yezidis, for example); carte blanche to giant Muslim enclaves in European metropolitan areas; actual legalization of Sharia law; failure to protect women and children from mass violence by migrants; acceptance of most disgusting primitive rites, such as female circumcision; legitimization of MB parties associated with Turkey and Qatar; and a ban on any criticism of Islam under the pretext of combating “Islamophobia.”
“When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth,” said Sherlock Holmes.
This is our case. Market globalists, progressives and jihadists have found allies in each other. Therefore, the Audi is advertised by a woman wearing a hijab and carrying the LGBT flag.
Alexander Maistrovoy is the author of Agony of Hercules or a Farewell to Democracy (Notes of a Stranger), available at Amazon and Barnes & Noble.
mortimer says
This is gaslighting, because Islam has brutal Sharia punishments for gays and lesbians.
Gaslighting is a malevolent form of psychological manipulation in which intentionally false information is given to the victims in order to make them doubt their own observations, memories, thoughts and perceptions.
gravenimage says
+1
Bikinis not Burkas says
Quran 2:282 says that women are half wits according to their testimony.
Bukhari Volume 1 Book 6 Hadith 301 Muhammad said women are deficient of intelligence!
Put on an Islamic head dress, raise your right hand and scream, Look at me, look at me I agree with Muhammad I am stupid.
mortimer says
Islam and Leftism are both carnivorous and both recognize one another as such. However, their combined alliance pretends that they are both vegetarians. Nothing could be further from the truth.
As a side note, Muslims globally eat THREE TIMES more meat than people of other faiths. .
Mads Rasmussen says
Capitalism/globalism just had to end-peak this way! The libertarian ideal of a universal individualism, a globalized “American dream”. America/the West as the universal republic open to all people and all creeds.
The ultimate hubris of capitalism and humanism (be it secular and/or hermetic-masonic)!
Islam probably is too old and eaten by its tumors to really score the jackpot from this, but a muslim crack at a caliphate is likely to be the direct result of the failing western capitalist-globalist model.
gravenimage says
Individualism, hope and work for the future, and free trade are all good things. But not everyone holds these values, or wants to–pious Muslims especially. And certainly Muslims are always happy to try and use their victims’ laws and values against them.
somehistory says
“Long lines In Aurora to get free monkeypox vaccine”
“The beach at the Aurora Reservoir was a party Saturday for Aurora’s Pride celebration.
Sister Caskara of the Golden Nugget Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence was there in costume enjoying themselves and performing community outreach.
“We love spreading joy in our communities and helping to fight the end of stigma,” they said. ”
For anyone interested, there are knowledgeable people who are warning this shot is really smallpox vaccine and it is highly dangerous.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/long-lines-in-aurora-to-get-free-monkeypox-vaccine/ar-AA10po43?cvid=b4be53fbd1484cb1b07d4d021e44d7d3
gravenimage says
Smallpox vaccine? Haven’t most people been vaccinated against smallpox? I know I have been. Smallpox was actually a *very* nasty disease, and was largely responsible for wiping out so many Native Americans, because they had no natural immunity to it at all.
somehistory says
People under a certain age have not been. My adult children were not, and I don’t know any young people who were because they had supposedly wiped it out. It was kept in certain places, in russia, and labs in the U.S…..just in case, but russia was making a bioweapon from the samples they have..
The monkeypox has never been transmitted between humans before this. However, b gates went down to Nigeria about five years ago, and got his fingers in, and now it is transmitted between humans and not just from monkeys or rodents.
He was photographed with the deputy to the mozlum pres…or pm, whatever he is, and also in the photos, the minister of health, and talking about …what else…vaccines…
the authorities claim that the smallpox vaccine will protect against monkeypox….they think. but it is very dangerous.
James Lincoln says
somehistory,
To your point, routine childhood immunization for smallpox was discontinued in the United States in 1972. The US military also stopped routine immunization of recruits in 1991.
People immunized before that have at least some protection against monkeypox.
Wellington says
Thanks for that info, James.
somehistory says
thank you, James. I couldn’t recall the exact year they stopped, I just know that it was not offered or given to my kids. I had the scratch on my arm…hardly made a scar that is now completely gone… when I was a child, and my mom actually had the disease, but lived to tell us about it.
gravenimage says
Somehistory, smallpox vaccines were discontinued because that disease has been wiped out–due to vaccinations.
I have issues with Bill Gates, but I have seen no evidence that he brought Monkeypox back from Nigeria.
There was a study in 1988 that found that the Smallpox vaccine was around 85% protective in preventing Monkeypox–so the disease definitely predates Bill Gates meeting with Buhari. Buhari has been president in Nigeria since 2015.
There was in fact a previous outbreak in the US–in 2003. A young child became ill with fever and rash after being bitten by a prairie dog purchased at a local swap meet near Milwaukee, Wisconsin. In total, 71 cases of monkeypox were reported through June 20, 2003. All cases were traced to Gambian pouched rats imported from Accra, Ghana, in April 2003 by a Texas exotic animal distributor.
This does not appear to have been linked to any activities by Bill Gates.
gravenimage says
Thank you, James.
somehistory says
I wrote that they had basically “wiped out” small pox and that is why the vaccinations were no longer given. that there were young adults that had never gotten the scrape.
this is what I wrote above in reply to your former comment: “because they had supposedly wiped it out. ” guess my “supposedly” was a trigger.
g, I’m sure you believe all you wrote. But, I saw the photos of the gates ghoul with the guys in nigeria and read what some of the doctors there had to say about him and what he wanted them to do. From years ago.
Now, you say there is no evidence. But that is because you haven’t seen the evidence. and that doesn’t necessarily mean there is “no evidence.”
What is more ****I never said that gates “brought back monkeypox from nigeria.”**** I said he went there and talked to doctors about vaccines and got his fingers in” and after that the monkey pox *changed.* It is now transmitted between humans.
my previous comment: “now it is transmitted between humans and not just from monkeys or rodents.’
btw, prairie dogs are rodents.
You don’t have to believe me. Others don’t have to believe me. But not believing something does not make it untrue.
the monkey pox being spread now is mostly on the areas where it was not previously found….since the homosexuals and bi are the ones spreading it….no rodents involved.
gravenimage says
Somehistory, diseases certainly mutate and change. And I am very open to evidence–if Bill Gates really either changed Monkeypox or did something bad in Nigeria, I would like to see it–and I certainly condemn this if he did it.
I did some looking–is it this story?
https://muslimmirror.com/eng/call-for-investigation-into-bill-gates-crimes-against-humanity-and-medical-malpractice/
Here Muslims are claiming that tetanus vaccines actually sterilize girls. There have been similar claims about polio vaccines. Polio has made a comeback in parts of the Muslim world.
somehistory says
There is evidence that he went and gave money to the nigerian gov …saying he wanted to make vaccines.
Just before the monkeypox came out in May of this year, he was saying that the next “pandemic” would “get their attention.”
Now, it matters not whether you believe that gates foundation…a.k.a. bill gates…gave money to have scientists manipulate the pox so it would transmit easily from human to human. I know he did it. I read the evidence. I don’t need to convince anyone else.
the only reason I replied as I did was because I had already stated that the smallpox vaccination program had ended due to not anyone here getting the disease, that gates had gone to africa and messed in with things there, and that the pox was now moving among people to people and not just through monkeys and rodents, and that the smallpox vaccine was being given as a remedy…
.And with your comment, you seemed…to me, more than seemed……to be saying that I had written something different.
The truth will come out. It always does. For some, it may be too late.
somehistory says
And, no that was not the story.
That is similar to what the Catholic church said, and the WHO admitted to when they said that the hormone was included in the tetanus vaccine…and had to be given five times …a shot every few months….when we get tetanus shots once every five or ten years.
And that was well documented….but hushed up. He was working on sterilizing the girls and young women and many unborn babies were lost.
somehistory says
https://www.activistpost.com/2022/08/bill-gates-monkeying-around-in-nigeria-years-ago.html
“On July 29th, on the heels of the World Hoax Organization (WHO) announcing monkeypox as the next “plandemic,” National Public Radio (NPR) put out a story that received little fanfare or coverage.
In 2017, Dr. Dimie Ogoina, professor of medicine and infectious diseases at Niger Delta University in Nigeria, tried to warn health officials that the monkeypox virus had changed, but somebody told him to be quiet. Who? Was it Bill Gates?”
Five years ago, Dr. Dimie Ogoina said he saw the most important patient of his career – an 11-year-old boy whose infection would eventually be linked to the largest monkeypox outbreak in history.
According to NPR, a few weeks after diagnosing the young boy, Ogoina started to “become concerned – quite concerned.” The outbreak in Nigeria began to grow rapidly. Cases cropped up in counties not just near this one boy, but all over.
“Suddenly, we were seeing cases appear across the country,” Ogoina said.
The boy was the first case of monkeypox in Nigeria in 38 years. But not the last. Eventually, they figured out that the young boy didn’t catch the virus from playing with a monkey (shocker!) but rather from a male relative in his household.
And rather than rashes on their face and extremities, blisters occurred around their genitals.
“They had very extensive genital lesions. Very, very extensive,” Ogoina says.’
Walter Sieruk says
The shadow of that insidious crescent is a reflection of the sinister movement known as “The Red/Green Alliance.”
Which is very subversive and dangerous.
gravenimage says
Globalization in the Shadow of the Crescent
………………………….
Islam is globalist, too–but has a rather different vision than does Audi…
Shalom says
I thoroughly enjoyed reading this article. It even gave me one or two chuckles ‘( What will be the fate of the marginal and wokesters? It will be sad, of course. But most likely, consciously or unconsciously, they are willing to return to their usual role of submissive and hunted pariahs, since they do not know how and do not want to enjoy the benefits of true freedom’ (so difficult in these times). But my hopes of a clash between Islam and Wokist lgbtq+ ideology don’t appear to be the conclusion according to the author.
OLD GUY says
Audi where is the diversity in Islam? Islam is nothing but a oneway street their way or NO way. Can’t see any DIVERSITY in that. But I guess if you want to expand your market to the Muslim world you advertise to their ideology. It is all about the global marketing and profit.
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
It’s funny how these corporations and their followers try so hard with their virtue signaling that they merely point out their own ignorance. Your photo is a perfect case in point and illustrates why is it so important to repress information as to the true nature of Islam. In its present incarnation in the minds of the progressives, lslam serves as a convenient tool for corporations to attempt to set themselves apart. It reminds me of the new adage being bandied about which states that Blacks can’t be racists. If you follow that statement to its logical conclusion, one will uncover an underlying belief that Blacks don’t have the intellectual capacity to be racists. The same can be said for the popular notion that women can’t be evil separate from the nurturance and support of a patriarchal system.
gravenimage says
+1