I’ll respond to your invitations for suggestions about what other shows to do. Since there was nothing this week that I didn’t say in previous weeks about the events themselves, aside from T Raja Singh, which I’ll describe in a separate post in this thread
I suggest that on a day that a certain country/region makes the news, you do a special show to cover it. If you’re unsure about the interactive show, w/ live subscribers, just do a recorded one and upload on your channel. Eg on a day when there’s a bunch of news items out of Nigeria, do a full show on the jihad in Nigeria, Boko Haram and so on. Similarly, on a day that there are a bunch of stories out of Germany, France, Sweden, etc, you could do a show on either any of the countries in question, or Europe as a whole. Just make sure that the show is on the same day that that region is in the news. Again, it’s up to you whether to treat individual countries separately, or deal w/ entire regions, such as Europe, Africa, the Indian subcontinent and so on
Once you’re comfortable as a host w/ all those bells & whistles, then in such shows you could have guests who are experts in the subject or the region in question, and also include the live audience Q&A. Like if you’re doing a jihad story that took place in Britain, you could get Tommy Robinson or Anne Marie Waters as your guest to put questions to them. If you’re doing one out of the subcontinent, you could have Sanjay Dixit as your guest to answer any region-specific or Hindu-specific questions one might have
Also, will next week’s show be on Wednesday, or Thursday as this week’s was?
Infidelsays
On T Raja Singh, I managed to watch the original video of what he said on YouTube in Hindi, before it was taken down
The skit he made was in reaction to a muslim ‘comedian’ Munawar Faruqui who’s in the past mocked various Hindu deities, and once made a joke about the Hindus who were burnt alive in the Godhra trains in 2002, saying that since Hindus are cremated, it was only too appropriate that they died in those trains that were set on fire. He had been boycotted over the last several months and many of his shows in several cities were cancelled due to protests, but in this case, he was invited by the Telengana chief minister to perform, and it was in reaction to that that T Raja Singh decided to retaliate w/ a skit of his own
Now for the skit itself. T Raja Singh started by describing the father of Munawar Faruqui. He described him as a 53 year old man, who married a 9 year old, then saw his daughter in law who was 9, got his son to divorce that wife so that he could marry her himself, and so now finally got to have a bunch of kids for his wives
Note that not only did he not mention Mohammed, but he kept it narrow to slandering Faruqui. Yeah, he used known attributes of Mohammed, but again mixed it up so that he has a pretty good deniability about islam’s founder being Faruqui’s dad. For instance, there seems to be nothing to suggest that Zainab was 9 when Mohammed had a crush on her and so got his son to divorce her, and he didn’t mention the name Aisha, leaving one to conclude that Zainab, not Aisha was the 9 year old ‘bride’. In other words, there is little similarity of islam’s founder w/ the person T Raja Singh described, and so he has a pretty good deniability there
T Raja Singh was arrested a second time by state police despite a court order that he be released. Since he’s an MLA, it’s a good possibility that he’ll have to be released again b’cos in India, like in the US, elected officials have special privileges above normal people, which happens to be a good thing in this particular case
I’m just waiting for the BJP to split into a secular party and a Hindutva party, and then let’s see who wins the next elections
gravenimagesays
The skit he made was in reaction to a muslim ‘comedian’ Munawar Faruqui who’s in the past mocked various Hindu deities, and once made a joke about the Hindus who were burnt alive in the Godhra trains in 2002, saying that since Hindus are cremated, it was only too appropriate that they died in those trains that were set on fire
……………………………………
Not a big fan, but making fun of Hindu deities or any other deity is fair game.
But *making fun of Hindus murdered in the most vicious way imaginable*? Just horrifying. I’m sure he would not be happy with anyone making fun of Muslims being killed by being buried, because most deceased Muslims choose burial, nor would any decent person consider this “humor”..
Infidelsays
Problem in India is that mocking Hindu deities is freedom of expression, but mocking Mohammed invites a death sentence. Since the latter doesn’t look like becoming legalized on the street, it’s just as well that the former be made more dangerous for muslims, else one has what one has today – an uneven playing field
somehistorysays
Yes, if India says there is ‘freedom of religion,’ then it should allow and protect equality…in expression and in mocking or, at the very least, allowing for criticism based on the facts. If that was the case, those poor women would not have been silenced for what they said about mozlums following a sleaze who raped a little girl and called it “marriage.”
gravenimagesays
Video: This Week in Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer
…………………………………….
This is definitely the best intro. I’m good with it.
And whatever makes this show easier to organize is fine.
In the Maldives a governmental minister was stabbed in the neck by a Muslim. And before this he was reciting the Qur’an. What could be more Islamic?
In Germany, a brave anti-Jihadist was struck in the head several time–the last, as i saw, *after* he had police protection. The officers arrested no one.
In Russia a Muslim was actually detained for a Jihad terror attack aimed at Indians. I have my issue with many of Russia’s actions of late, but applaud them for doing the right thing here.
And in India, while ‘blasphemy’ is *not* a crime, the police there have been going after someone who dared say something obliquely critical of Muhammed’s raping a nine-year-old child. And police in India–not even a Muslim country–went after the critic, not those threatening to murder him. Deeply disturbing dhimmitude.
gravenimagesays
In Pakistan a mob tries to lynch a Hindu sanitary worker who had burnt Qur’an pages near him. Police prevented this–but only so they could arrest the Hindu victim. And he’s *a sanitary worker*–he picks up trash. These Qur’an pages were probably part of the garbage he was picking up–but this was a good excuse to harm Hindus. This in fact happens all the time.
And good point re Breivik–he was actually inspired *by Al Qaeda*. He in fact condemned Robert Spencer for *not* advocating violence. And of course he did not target Muslims in any case, but his fellow Norwegians in his vicious attack.
Then in Somalia there was a bombing by Al Shebab at a hotel. And don’t expect Somalian authorities to really go after these murderous Jihadists, despite their claims. The problem is that all too many “ordinary Muslims” *support* this savagery, and consider it orthodox Islam.
And not just Somalia, of course, but in other parts of Dar-al-Islam all over the world. (Jihad terror attacks in Dar-al-Harb are of course related, as well).
And Imams are recruiting for Jihad terrorists–and this happens all the time. Because this is what Islam itself teaches. As David Wood points, out, the whole “Islam is a religion of peace” thing is Taqiyya aimed at hopeful Infidels, not something that pious Muslims believe.
gravenimagesays
And funny, as David Wood notes, that Muslim apologists never preach that Islam is a religion of peace in Dar-al-Islam itself. This message is always Taqiyya aimed at the credulous Infidels, especially in the West.
An example being an Islamic cleric in Iran lauding the attack on Salman Rushdie, and a Muslim online saying that he got this all wrong. But of course he is not going to Tehran to speak to the cleric and show him how he has gotten Islam so very, very wrong. This again is just aimed at the Kufar.
In Lebanon a Muslim notes that the Fatwa against Rushdie kept Infidels from “blaspheming” Islam. Grimly he is not wrong. Attacks on Rushdie, the Danish Muhammad cartoons, and Charlie Hebdo has cowed all too many critics of Islam.
Worse yet, this is not just always simple fear, which is not laudable, but certainly understandable, but far worse dhimmis who say that it is *wrong* to criticize the horrors of Islam, and that if a Jihadist then tries to murder you that you deserved it. Grotesque but hardly uncommon. There was more of this just recently in an article at the American Conservative, of all places.
This teaches Muslims that Jihad terror *works*.
In Nigeria Jihadists murder over 20 Christians in church. They also kidnap Christians.
In France, a Muslim fires random shots in the street, screaming “Allahu Akbar!”.
In Birmingham, England, a Jihadist waves a knife around, screaming–what might it be? “Allahu Akbar!”. Then he threatens police. He is sent to a mental hospital, despite this obviously being another Jihad terror attack. This is terribly common.
Then more Islamic antisemitism–and even one that Robert Spencer missed. In England a Muslim travels all the way from Yorkshire and attacks Jewish men in London–but this supposedly has nothing to do with Islam…
At the University of Denver the Muslim heading the Middle Eastern Studies department claims that the stabber of Salman Rushdie is actually…Mossad. This, despite the perp, Hadi Matar, being Muslim, openly saying he did it in the name of Islam, and castigating his mother for not bringing him up as a stricter Muslim. But who cares? Must be the Joooooooos! Don’t count on the University of Denver to do anything about this–they have already been embarrassed by his claiming that Israel is an apartheid state. They disavowed this point of view, but that’s as far as they went.
And in Iran itself, an American Muslim professor again blames the Jews on Iranian state TV. Never mind that other official reactions to the stabbing have lauded it.
In the “West Bank” a Muslim admits that his motivation is the violent spread of Islam, and that there is no more need for Jihad to be defensive. Yep, this is what Islam teaches, and virtually the whole history of Islam.
Yet all too many in the West do not want to know this.
David Wood is right about the message of Jihad being based on the percentage of Muslims in any given society.
A Guinian immigrant–almost certainly Muslim–rapes a Ukrainian refugee in Italy, and an Italian candidate posts the video and promises to protect victims. Grotesquely, many other politicians have condemned not the rapist but the leader who *condemns* the rape for daring to post the video. Apparently using this video to condemn rape is “indecent”, but no such condemnation of the rape itself. More apologia for the horrors of Islam.
Note–many years ago I was a victim of rape. If there had been a video of the attack and airing it would have possibly protected other victims, I would have been *fine* with using it.
Walter Sieruksays
The left does hate Donald Trump with a passion. This is a reflection of the Leftist/Islamic alliance. As for the Islamic part, not that many years ago the President Trump put that America and Israel hating “mullah regime” of Iran in its place, In contrast, Joe Biden with his so called “agreement deal” with that hostile Islamic tyranny of Iran is ,very much a “disaster” as well as an horrendous catastrophe and also an outright hoax.
Anyone who can’t see that it’s a calamity either is wearing his or her politically correct blinders or is an anti-America and anti-Israel subversive. For that hoax of a deal that Joe Biden that made with that hostile ant-America Islamic tyranny of Iran exposes just how horrendously terribly treasonous Biden actually is.
For Biden is either an incompetent feeble -minded fool or a traitorous treasonous villain.Which even the case with him, Biden by giving away everything to those tyrants of that Islamic regime of Iran who such spiteful enemies of the United States that they publicly refer to her as “the Great Satan.” Likewise, they brainwash and then incite the Iranian people to chant, over and over again “Death to America” reveals much about the sinister and insidious character of subversive creepy old Joe.
Therefore, Biden by appeasing supporting and further upholding that anti-American vicious and hostile “mullah regime” has to be a very evil, un-American very despicable and dangerous man.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Infidel says
I’ll respond to your invitations for suggestions about what other shows to do. Since there was nothing this week that I didn’t say in previous weeks about the events themselves, aside from T Raja Singh, which I’ll describe in a separate post in this thread
I suggest that on a day that a certain country/region makes the news, you do a special show to cover it. If you’re unsure about the interactive show, w/ live subscribers, just do a recorded one and upload on your channel. Eg on a day when there’s a bunch of news items out of Nigeria, do a full show on the jihad in Nigeria, Boko Haram and so on. Similarly, on a day that there are a bunch of stories out of Germany, France, Sweden, etc, you could do a show on either any of the countries in question, or Europe as a whole. Just make sure that the show is on the same day that that region is in the news. Again, it’s up to you whether to treat individual countries separately, or deal w/ entire regions, such as Europe, Africa, the Indian subcontinent and so on
Once you’re comfortable as a host w/ all those bells & whistles, then in such shows you could have guests who are experts in the subject or the region in question, and also include the live audience Q&A. Like if you’re doing a jihad story that took place in Britain, you could get Tommy Robinson or Anne Marie Waters as your guest to put questions to them. If you’re doing one out of the subcontinent, you could have Sanjay Dixit as your guest to answer any region-specific or Hindu-specific questions one might have
Also, will next week’s show be on Wednesday, or Thursday as this week’s was?
Infidel says
On T Raja Singh, I managed to watch the original video of what he said on YouTube in Hindi, before it was taken down
The skit he made was in reaction to a muslim ‘comedian’ Munawar Faruqui who’s in the past mocked various Hindu deities, and once made a joke about the Hindus who were burnt alive in the Godhra trains in 2002, saying that since Hindus are cremated, it was only too appropriate that they died in those trains that were set on fire. He had been boycotted over the last several months and many of his shows in several cities were cancelled due to protests, but in this case, he was invited by the Telengana chief minister to perform, and it was in reaction to that that T Raja Singh decided to retaliate w/ a skit of his own
Now for the skit itself. T Raja Singh started by describing the father of Munawar Faruqui. He described him as a 53 year old man, who married a 9 year old, then saw his daughter in law who was 9, got his son to divorce that wife so that he could marry her himself, and so now finally got to have a bunch of kids for his wives
Note that not only did he not mention Mohammed, but he kept it narrow to slandering Faruqui. Yeah, he used known attributes of Mohammed, but again mixed it up so that he has a pretty good deniability about islam’s founder being Faruqui’s dad. For instance, there seems to be nothing to suggest that Zainab was 9 when Mohammed had a crush on her and so got his son to divorce her, and he didn’t mention the name Aisha, leaving one to conclude that Zainab, not Aisha was the 9 year old ‘bride’. In other words, there is little similarity of islam’s founder w/ the person T Raja Singh described, and so he has a pretty good deniability there
T Raja Singh was arrested a second time by state police despite a court order that he be released. Since he’s an MLA, it’s a good possibility that he’ll have to be released again b’cos in India, like in the US, elected officials have special privileges above normal people, which happens to be a good thing in this particular case
I’m just waiting for the BJP to split into a secular party and a Hindutva party, and then let’s see who wins the next elections
gravenimage says
The skit he made was in reaction to a muslim ‘comedian’ Munawar Faruqui who’s in the past mocked various Hindu deities, and once made a joke about the Hindus who were burnt alive in the Godhra trains in 2002, saying that since Hindus are cremated, it was only too appropriate that they died in those trains that were set on fire
……………………………………
Not a big fan, but making fun of Hindu deities or any other deity is fair game.
But *making fun of Hindus murdered in the most vicious way imaginable*? Just horrifying. I’m sure he would not be happy with anyone making fun of Muslims being killed by being buried, because most deceased Muslims choose burial, nor would any decent person consider this “humor”..
Infidel says
Problem in India is that mocking Hindu deities is freedom of expression, but mocking Mohammed invites a death sentence. Since the latter doesn’t look like becoming legalized on the street, it’s just as well that the former be made more dangerous for muslims, else one has what one has today – an uneven playing field
somehistory says
Yes, if India says there is ‘freedom of religion,’ then it should allow and protect equality…in expression and in mocking or, at the very least, allowing for criticism based on the facts. If that was the case, those poor women would not have been silenced for what they said about mozlums following a sleaze who raped a little girl and called it “marriage.”
gravenimage says
Video: This Week in Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer
…………………………………….
This is definitely the best intro. I’m good with it.
And whatever makes this show easier to organize is fine.
In the Maldives a governmental minister was stabbed in the neck by a Muslim. And before this he was reciting the Qur’an. What could be more Islamic?
In Germany, a brave anti-Jihadist was struck in the head several time–the last, as i saw, *after* he had police protection. The officers arrested no one.
In Russia a Muslim was actually detained for a Jihad terror attack aimed at Indians. I have my issue with many of Russia’s actions of late, but applaud them for doing the right thing here.
And in India, while ‘blasphemy’ is *not* a crime, the police there have been going after someone who dared say something obliquely critical of Muhammed’s raping a nine-year-old child. And police in India–not even a Muslim country–went after the critic, not those threatening to murder him. Deeply disturbing dhimmitude.
gravenimage says
In Pakistan a mob tries to lynch a Hindu sanitary worker who had burnt Qur’an pages near him. Police prevented this–but only so they could arrest the Hindu victim. And he’s *a sanitary worker*–he picks up trash. These Qur’an pages were probably part of the garbage he was picking up–but this was a good excuse to harm Hindus. This in fact happens all the time.
And good point re Breivik–he was actually inspired *by Al Qaeda*. He in fact condemned Robert Spencer for *not* advocating violence. And of course he did not target Muslims in any case, but his fellow Norwegians in his vicious attack.
Then in Somalia there was a bombing by Al Shebab at a hotel. And don’t expect Somalian authorities to really go after these murderous Jihadists, despite their claims. The problem is that all too many “ordinary Muslims” *support* this savagery, and consider it orthodox Islam.
And not just Somalia, of course, but in other parts of Dar-al-Islam all over the world. (Jihad terror attacks in Dar-al-Harb are of course related, as well).
And Imams are recruiting for Jihad terrorists–and this happens all the time. Because this is what Islam itself teaches. As David Wood points, out, the whole “Islam is a religion of peace” thing is Taqiyya aimed at hopeful Infidels, not something that pious Muslims believe.
gravenimage says
And funny, as David Wood notes, that Muslim apologists never preach that Islam is a religion of peace in Dar-al-Islam itself. This message is always Taqiyya aimed at the credulous Infidels, especially in the West.
An example being an Islamic cleric in Iran lauding the attack on Salman Rushdie, and a Muslim online saying that he got this all wrong. But of course he is not going to Tehran to speak to the cleric and show him how he has gotten Islam so very, very wrong. This again is just aimed at the Kufar.
In Lebanon a Muslim notes that the Fatwa against Rushdie kept Infidels from “blaspheming” Islam. Grimly he is not wrong. Attacks on Rushdie, the Danish Muhammad cartoons, and Charlie Hebdo has cowed all too many critics of Islam.
Worse yet, this is not just always simple fear, which is not laudable, but certainly understandable, but far worse dhimmis who say that it is *wrong* to criticize the horrors of Islam, and that if a Jihadist then tries to murder you that you deserved it. Grotesque but hardly uncommon. There was more of this just recently in an article at the American Conservative, of all places.
This teaches Muslims that Jihad terror *works*.
In Nigeria Jihadists murder over 20 Christians in church. They also kidnap Christians.
In France, a Muslim fires random shots in the street, screaming “Allahu Akbar!”.
In Birmingham, England, a Jihadist waves a knife around, screaming–what might it be? “Allahu Akbar!”. Then he threatens police. He is sent to a mental hospital, despite this obviously being another Jihad terror attack. This is terribly common.
Then more Islamic antisemitism–and even one that Robert Spencer missed. In England a Muslim travels all the way from Yorkshire and attacks Jewish men in London–but this supposedly has nothing to do with Islam…
At the University of Denver the Muslim heading the Middle Eastern Studies department claims that the stabber of Salman Rushdie is actually…Mossad. This, despite the perp, Hadi Matar, being Muslim, openly saying he did it in the name of Islam, and castigating his mother for not bringing him up as a stricter Muslim. But who cares? Must be the Joooooooos! Don’t count on the University of Denver to do anything about this–they have already been embarrassed by his claiming that Israel is an apartheid state. They disavowed this point of view, but that’s as far as they went.
And in Iran itself, an American Muslim professor again blames the Jews on Iranian state TV. Never mind that other official reactions to the stabbing have lauded it.
In the “West Bank” a Muslim admits that his motivation is the violent spread of Islam, and that there is no more need for Jihad to be defensive. Yep, this is what Islam teaches, and virtually the whole history of Islam.
Yet all too many in the West do not want to know this.
David Wood is right about the message of Jihad being based on the percentage of Muslims in any given society.
A Guinian immigrant–almost certainly Muslim–rapes a Ukrainian refugee in Italy, and an Italian candidate posts the video and promises to protect victims. Grotesquely, many other politicians have condemned not the rapist but the leader who *condemns* the rape for daring to post the video. Apparently using this video to condemn rape is “indecent”, but no such condemnation of the rape itself. More apologia for the horrors of Islam.
Note–many years ago I was a victim of rape. If there had been a video of the attack and airing it would have possibly protected other victims, I would have been *fine* with using it.
Walter Sieruk says
The left does hate Donald Trump with a passion. This is a reflection of the Leftist/Islamic alliance. As for the Islamic part, not that many years ago the President Trump put that America and Israel hating “mullah regime” of Iran in its place, In contrast, Joe Biden with his so called “agreement deal” with that hostile Islamic tyranny of Iran is ,very much a “disaster” as well as an horrendous catastrophe and also an outright hoax.
Anyone who can’t see that it’s a calamity either is wearing his or her politically correct blinders or is an anti-America and anti-Israel subversive. For that hoax of a deal that Joe Biden that made with that hostile ant-America Islamic tyranny of Iran exposes just how horrendously terribly treasonous Biden actually is.
For Biden is either an incompetent feeble -minded fool or a traitorous treasonous villain.Which even the case with him, Biden by giving away everything to those tyrants of that Islamic regime of Iran who such spiteful enemies of the United States that they publicly refer to her as “the Great Satan.” Likewise, they brainwash and then incite the Iranian people to chant, over and over again “Death to America” reveals much about the sinister and insidious character of subversive creepy old Joe.
Therefore, Biden by appeasing supporting and further upholding that anti-American vicious and hostile “mullah regime” has to be a very evil, un-American very despicable and dangerous man.