Harassed by whom? By Muslims. That’s clear from his saying “So that they can be recognised as Muslim and not be harassed.” The idea is that Muslims will see that a woman is Muslim and refrain from harassing her, and harass women who are non-Muslim.
“‘Hijab distinguishes Muslim women from others so molesters can spare them’: Lawyer for hijabs in school had cited Quranic verse, old tweet surfaces,” OpIndia, September 20, 2022:
Amidst the Supreme Court hearing in the wrangling hijab row, an old tweet posted by Nizam Pasha, one of the advocates arguing for hijabs in state-run schools, has gone viral on the internet. In his tweet, Pasha has cited Quranic verse to say how hijab helps molesters to distinguish Muslim women so they can be spared.
Citing Quran 33:59, Pasha, who had posted the tweet in February 2022, said Muslim women should wear hijabs so that they can be identified as Muslims and not be harassed.
“Holy Quran 33:59 explains why Muslim women should wear a hijab. “So that they can be recognised as Muslim and not be harassed.” The hijab is meant to tell people that this is a strong woman with a strong community standing behind her that you are taking on, so tread with caution,” Pasha had tweeted….
somehistory says
the ugly scarf says to mozlum creeps who have a mind and soul which allows thoughts of rape to freely reside therein, ‘go look for a woman with uncovered hair to satisfy your lust.’
Most infidel males do not go about looking for women to “harass” and “molest” and trying to decide which woman is “strong” and has a “community behind her” to come after and give payback for rape.
However, the mindset of mozlum males is precisely that. mozlum males have a rapist’s mindset…the lust is always there and the feeling that they have a *right* to molest and harass and rape any woman who is, in their mind, “uncovered.” The woman not wearing a scarf to cover her hair is ‘just asking for it.’
the woman without the scarf is proclaiming that she is an infidel, and that fact is enough for the mozlum to decide she warrants rape.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Somehistory.
Infidel says
I really hope the anti-hijab side in the Indian Supreme Court points this out – that hijabs are meant to signal to muslims which women can be safely harassed, and which ones are hands off
But given how woke that court is, I’m not holding my breath
gravenimage says
“Quran explains why Muslim women should wear hijab. ‘So they can be recognised as Muslim and not be harassed.’”
…………………………………..
Nizam Pasha is lying, of course. This is not so that Infidels will not molest them, but so *Muslims* will not molest them.
Qur’an 33:59 reads: “O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested…”
Mohsin Khan in his translation even follows “should be known” with ” (as free respectable women”–that is, known *to Muslims” as Muslim and not Infidels or Infidel slaves.
All through the Qur’an and the Hadith Muslims are told that they can abduct, rape, and forcibly marry Infidel women and girls.
And this is in reference to a Hijab ban in Indian schools–this creep is saying that Infidels target schoolgirls–but this is nothing but projection. It is Islam which sacralizes pedophilia.
Scotsman48 says
Riddle me this:… If muslim men demand that women cover their bodies from head to toe otherwise they will feel the need, and have the right, to rape them then does this mean that muslim men are indeed calling themselves rapists?.
Inquiring minds want to know.
PRCS says
Qur’an passages, with the exception of Surah 2, are listed in accordance with each one’s length; number 114 being the longest and last.
The common belief–around the world–that modesty is hijab’s primary purpose is false. As Qur’an 33:59 comes before the so-called modesty passage (24:31), Islamic supremacy gets that title.
*Sahih International:
O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.
The obvious meaning: ‘unbelieving women’ remain fair game to a Muslim man’s tender mercies.
The real issue for us: though knowing how intentionally insulting that bigotry is, and that it has no legal standing here, Muslims continue to demand that we accept it–and respect it–under the guise of Islam’s modesty culture as numerous articles at JW and elsewhere attest.
This Iraqi refugee girl–living in Utah–made clear what Islam teaches (see at 0:18)
https://www.fox13now.com/2018/11/15/letter-encourages-schools-to-adopt-religious-clothing-guidelines-after-boy-rips-girls-hijab-off-during-recess
Until we challenge Muslims in Western nations to either defend or reject that belief, it will continue.
European pagan says
Woman without hijab was raped > muslims think because she didn’t wear a hijab.
I saw a documentary, Bangladeshi woman with headscarf went home from work in the night and she was raped. > muslims said why is she outside in the night.
Arrogant-Kafir says
The dubious verse is only an instigation for the muslim men to rape non muslim women.
PRCS says
There is nothing dubious about Qur’an.
Its every word is fiction; written by ignorant 7th-century desert dwellers.
James Lincoln says
So, according to the feature article:
“Pasha…said Muslim women should wear hijabs so that they can be identified as Muslims and not be harassed.”
Does he also believe that Jews should wear yarmulkes so that they can be identified as Jewish and not be harassed?