You called this the ‘Iran Protests Edition’, but this one had a record number of India stories
8:00 While you cited the Hindu saint pretending to know more about islam than his hosts in Hyderabad, there was another case yesterday on Indian TV where 2 muslims – one Imam, another muslimah spokeswoman, who made claims about the Rig Veda – one of the actual Hindu scriptural books, endorsing the hijab and claiming, somewhat incredulously, that the Hindus, like the Jews, distorted their own sacred texts 😶
37:00 The garba events are dedicated to the Hindu goddess Durga, rather than the god Ganesh, which is a few months earlier. I think Ashlyn described it in one of her reports
41:00 On the report about 24 muslims raping one English girl, Mark Steyn on his show yesterday read out some of the names, and while doing that, he said that since no British media outlet would report on them, he had to depend on an Indian outlet – OpIndia – for that report, and then read out most of the names
46:00 Reason that muslimahs can’t marry non-muslim men is that sex is considered the equivalent of a territorial conquest of the woman by the man. So a muslim having sex w/ a non-muslim girl is like a muslim army conquering infidel territory. But if a non-muslim were to have sex w/ a muslimah, that would be like an infidel army conquering a muslim land, and that’s a big no-no in islam, if they can help it
53:00 If Iran falls, I doubt that it would trigger an islamic collapse in other places. After all, in 1924, the caliphate in Turkey ended, and that had a lot more pan islamic support across the ummah, since it was a sunni entity, whereas this Iranian regime is shi’a. While the Iranians do have pretentions to the leadership of islam, that is the one thing preventing them from attaining it. As it is, ever since Erdogan started to provide an alternative leadership to Muslim Brotherhood affiliated groups, even Iran’s hold on them has weakened
If you & Dave do decide to have pina coladas, do it in some nice Pacific island, far from the presence of islam. Even Hawaii would do, if Tahiti is out of your budget 😈
57:00 I like David’s idea of people doing dedicated channels on jihad in individual countries in Africa. I myself follow the jihad in India, although most of the channels dedicated to that are in Hindi. But it’s a great idea anyway for the countries in question
1:00:00 I’ll watch the Tony Costa show later
Yeah, this indeed was a better jihad show 😈
bill carrsays
Muslims operate like wolf packs as they are cowards and mostlyneed a group. No offence to wolves which I like
Walter Sieruksays
David Wood and Robert Spencer in their discussion brought up the very important subject of all the protests that the Iranian people are doing against that hideous Islamic regime of Iran.
Mr.Spencer did make mention about the apparent weakness of that tyranny ,as those in power lied to hide the fact that Mahsa Amini , a healthy young woman, was beaten by the so called :”morality police” so terrible that she eventually died , was murdered , by the physical abuse from them .’
Then they had the lying gall to say that she died of a “heart attack,” when those pictures of her in the hospital clearly revealed she was severely beaten.
Likewise, another young woman who went to the freedom protests was thrown off a roof and then those despicable murderous Islamic “security forces ” in a feeble attempt to cover up claimed that she had “just accidently fell off that roof. That was a very obvious preposterous lie to hide the truth from the people of the civilized world. That lie was outright ludicrous.
Mr. Spencer ,rightly referred to all those Iranian women out on the streets as “courageous” and as “fearless heroes ” for standing up together against that horrendous and horrorifc regime.
For they would all be brutal murdered by that Islamic tyrany’s Islamic “police force ” if they didn’t have the ‘eyes of the world” watching all those events. Nevertheless those women are still taking a brave and dangerous chance. A very righteous chance ,yet still a very risky chance.
Furthermore, that abomination that is that “mullah regime” of Iran is very oppressive to both men and women , much more so the women since that tyranny reeks of vile malicious misogyny.
It’s still an anti-humankind tyranny. therefore, Those protest engaged in by the people of Iran are right and righteous. For the tyrannical Islamic regime is cruelly oppressive in many very brutal hostile and murderous ways.
The Iranian people do have every right to rise up and overthrow that horrendous Islamic tyranny which terribly abuses them and denies then their basic human rights and reasonable personal freedoms and establish a real genuine government.
This is their nature right by, common sense and even explained that very intelligent men, who man Iranians in their quest for freedom might not even know about, as the British philosopher, John Locke.
Michael Copelandsays
May a modest correction be offered?
It was not to his father that Abraham said, “Between us and you enmity and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone”. It was Abraham and those with him when they said “to their people”, the Jews, “Between us and you ….etc”. (Koran 60:4).
Abraham told his father that he would ask forgiveness for him, but said “I have no power to do anything for you before Allah .”
somehistorysays
the writers of the book of lies and filth, took little snippets from the Bible…important ones…and twisted them all around so that they would appear to mean something entirely different.
In Genesis, God said, “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise His heel’ chapter 3
He was speaking to the angel who had become satan the devil and the “seed” of satan would be any humans he could cause to rebel against God and His authority, and the “seed” of the woman would be humans who would be obedient to God. The “woman” was not Eve, but a figurative woman….the woman written about in Revelation 12, who gave birth to a son, and whom the “dragon”…satan the devil…wished to kill.
satan did “bruise” Jesus in the heel by having him murdered; and Jesus will “bruise” satan in the head by destroying him completely.
And there is that foretold “enmity” between the two groups of people. It is especially evident today.
Rajasays
Somehistory,
You are 100% right. The enmity between the serpent and the woman is well known and most bible-followers would agree to what said. There are lots of parallel verses to prove the point.
The bible does prophesy that Ishmael would be a donkey of a man. This link might be useless for bible “students”: https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/963-ishmael-his-hand-against-every-man
What we need to remember is that the bible interprets itself. There are no off-the-cuff references “here and there”. In contrast koran does have errors and some weirdo superstitions including blatant lies and contradictions challenging the truths of the bible.
In the question of Michael above it seems the koran has indeed hijacked the verse of the bible with a spin and twist of story.
Scotsman48says
A bearded muslim can write… I will kill you… on Twitter… and not get banned but let one non muslim use the same words towards a muslim and Twitter will ban them faster than they banned President Trump for some midnight tweets.
somehistorysays
there are mozlums working at twitter and fb. one can expect only that they will allow whatever a fellow mozlum writes and whatever furthers their intentions and helps them reach their goals.
bill carrsays
Muslims cannot reason, and especially the clerics, as their brains have been taken over by the doctrines of Islam
gravenimagesays
Video: This Week in Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer
…………………………………………..
Glad to see This Week in Jihad back–(unless, of course, there was nothing to cover, which would be great).
I like the idea that criticizing Islam is “hate”, but using bad photoshop to show the very peaceful Geert Wilders and Robert Spencer beheaded is not. Muslim “logic”…
Then, I like the idea that opposing Islamic violence “disturbs world peace”. This beheading knife icons are pretty “peaceful” as well…
And Robert Spencer is the “devil” for saying that Islamic violence is a negative thing…
But yes–so long as these Jihadists are waging the “Jihad of bad Photoshop” they are not out waging violent Jihad. Way to go, Robert Spencer!
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
You called this the ‘Iran Protests Edition’, but this one had a record number of India stories
8:00 While you cited the Hindu saint pretending to know more about islam than his hosts in Hyderabad, there was another case yesterday on Indian TV where 2 muslims – one Imam, another muslimah spokeswoman, who made claims about the Rig Veda – one of the actual Hindu scriptural books, endorsing the hijab and claiming, somewhat incredulously, that the Hindus, like the Jews, distorted their own sacred texts 😶
https://www.opindia.com/2022/10/hijab-debate-syeda-falak-maulana-sajid-rashidi-misquote-rigveda-to-make-derogatory-remarks-on-sita-lakshmana
37:00 The garba events are dedicated to the Hindu goddess Durga, rather than the god Ganesh, which is a few months earlier. I think Ashlyn described it in one of her reports
41:00 On the report about 24 muslims raping one English girl, Mark Steyn on his show yesterday read out some of the names, and while doing that, he said that since no British media outlet would report on them, he had to depend on an Indian outlet – OpIndia – for that report, and then read out most of the names
46:00 Reason that muslimahs can’t marry non-muslim men is that sex is considered the equivalent of a territorial conquest of the woman by the man. So a muslim having sex w/ a non-muslim girl is like a muslim army conquering infidel territory. But if a non-muslim were to have sex w/ a muslimah, that would be like an infidel army conquering a muslim land, and that’s a big no-no in islam, if they can help it
53:00 If Iran falls, I doubt that it would trigger an islamic collapse in other places. After all, in 1924, the caliphate in Turkey ended, and that had a lot more pan islamic support across the ummah, since it was a sunni entity, whereas this Iranian regime is shi’a. While the Iranians do have pretentions to the leadership of islam, that is the one thing preventing them from attaining it. As it is, ever since Erdogan started to provide an alternative leadership to Muslim Brotherhood affiliated groups, even Iran’s hold on them has weakened
If you & Dave do decide to have pina coladas, do it in some nice Pacific island, far from the presence of islam. Even Hawaii would do, if Tahiti is out of your budget 😈
57:00 I like David’s idea of people doing dedicated channels on jihad in individual countries in Africa. I myself follow the jihad in India, although most of the channels dedicated to that are in Hindi. But it’s a great idea anyway for the countries in question
1:00:00 I’ll watch the Tony Costa show later
Yeah, this indeed was a better jihad show 😈
bill carr says
Muslims operate like wolf packs as they are cowards and mostlyneed a group. No offence to wolves which I like
Walter Sieruk says
David Wood and Robert Spencer in their discussion brought up the very important subject of all the protests that the Iranian people are doing against that hideous Islamic regime of Iran.
Mr.Spencer did make mention about the apparent weakness of that tyranny ,as those in power lied to hide the fact that Mahsa Amini , a healthy young woman, was beaten by the so called :”morality police” so terrible that she eventually died , was murdered , by the physical abuse from them .’
Then they had the lying gall to say that she died of a “heart attack,” when those pictures of her in the hospital clearly revealed she was severely beaten.
Likewise, another young woman who went to the freedom protests was thrown off a roof and then those despicable murderous Islamic “security forces ” in a feeble attempt to cover up claimed that she had “just accidently fell off that roof. That was a very obvious preposterous lie to hide the truth from the people of the civilized world. That lie was outright ludicrous.
Mr. Spencer ,rightly referred to all those Iranian women out on the streets as “courageous” and as “fearless heroes ” for standing up together against that horrendous and horrorifc regime.
For they would all be brutal murdered by that Islamic tyrany’s Islamic “police force ” if they didn’t have the ‘eyes of the world” watching all those events. Nevertheless those women are still taking a brave and dangerous chance. A very righteous chance ,yet still a very risky chance.
Furthermore, that abomination that is that “mullah regime” of Iran is very oppressive to both men and women , much more so the women since that tyranny reeks of vile malicious misogyny.
It’s still an anti-humankind tyranny. therefore, Those protest engaged in by the people of Iran are right and righteous. For the tyrannical Islamic regime is cruelly oppressive in many very brutal hostile and murderous ways.
The Iranian people do have every right to rise up and overthrow that horrendous Islamic tyranny which terribly abuses them and denies then their basic human rights and reasonable personal freedoms and establish a real genuine government.
This is their nature right by, common sense and even explained that very intelligent men, who man Iranians in their quest for freedom might not even know about, as the British philosopher, John Locke.
Michael Copeland says
May a modest correction be offered?
It was not to his father that Abraham said, “Between us and you enmity and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone”. It was Abraham and those with him when they said “to their people”, the Jews, “Between us and you ….etc”. (Koran 60:4).
Abraham told his father that he would ask forgiveness for him, but said “I have no power to do anything for you before Allah .”
somehistory says
the writers of the book of lies and filth, took little snippets from the Bible…important ones…and twisted them all around so that they would appear to mean something entirely different.
In Genesis, God said, “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise His heel’ chapter 3
He was speaking to the angel who had become satan the devil and the “seed” of satan would be any humans he could cause to rebel against God and His authority, and the “seed” of the woman would be humans who would be obedient to God. The “woman” was not Eve, but a figurative woman….the woman written about in Revelation 12, who gave birth to a son, and whom the “dragon”…satan the devil…wished to kill.
satan did “bruise” Jesus in the heel by having him murdered; and Jesus will “bruise” satan in the head by destroying him completely.
And there is that foretold “enmity” between the two groups of people. It is especially evident today.
Raja says
Somehistory,
You are 100% right. The enmity between the serpent and the woman is well known and most bible-followers would agree to what said. There are lots of parallel verses to prove the point.
The bible does prophesy that Ishmael would be a donkey of a man. This link might be useless for bible “students”: https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/963-ishmael-his-hand-against-every-man
What we need to remember is that the bible interprets itself. There are no off-the-cuff references “here and there”. In contrast koran does have errors and some weirdo superstitions including blatant lies and contradictions challenging the truths of the bible.
In the question of Michael above it seems the koran has indeed hijacked the verse of the bible with a spin and twist of story.
Scotsman48 says
A bearded muslim can write… I will kill you… on Twitter… and not get banned but let one non muslim use the same words towards a muslim and Twitter will ban them faster than they banned President Trump for some midnight tweets.
somehistory says
there are mozlums working at twitter and fb. one can expect only that they will allow whatever a fellow mozlum writes and whatever furthers their intentions and helps them reach their goals.
bill carr says
Muslims cannot reason, and especially the clerics, as their brains have been taken over by the doctrines of Islam
gravenimage says
Video: This Week in Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer
…………………………………………..
Glad to see This Week in Jihad back–(unless, of course, there was nothing to cover, which would be great).
I like the idea that criticizing Islam is “hate”, but using bad photoshop to show the very peaceful Geert Wilders and Robert Spencer beheaded is not. Muslim “logic”…
Then, I like the idea that opposing Islamic violence “disturbs world peace”. This beheading knife icons are pretty “peaceful” as well…
And Robert Spencer is the “devil” for saying that Islamic violence is a negative thing…
But yes–so long as these Jihadists are waging the “Jihad of bad Photoshop” they are not out waging violent Jihad. Way to go, Robert Spencer!