The deceit of Islamic supremacists has enabled them to run rings around naive Western leaders. Now, however, UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman is condemning political correctness, which she notes has allowed “Islamist extremism to flourish in Britain.” Braverman told a counter “extremism” conference “that a ‘highly coordinated’ Islamist network was working in the United Kingdom while looking ‘perfectly respectable’ but contained extremist views under the surface.”
Westerners are easily fooled by appearances. Yet even children are taught not to fall for candy and a kind look. Nevertheless, pointing out strategies of deceit brings swift retaliation. This should raise questions.
My own dismissal as a government appointee in Canada, for instance, was due to my exposing Islamic supremacist deceit. My personal warning to Icelanders back in May 2017 is what set off the final controversy that ended in my firing as a director with the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, on which Canada’s “Islamophobia czar,” Amira Elghawaby, now sits. An excerpt from that warning:
But you need street smarts with regard to immigrants. Islamic supremacists will smile at you, invite you to their gatherings, make you feel loved and welcome, but they do it to deceive you and to overtake you, your land and your freedoms. They intentionally make you feel guilty for questioning their torturous deeds toward humanity — toward women, Christians, gays, Jews, apostates, infidels and anyone who dares to oppose these deeds.
My warning also followed me into a 2019 conference at which I spoke. Muslim professor Jasmin Zine claimed she was assaulted after she was physically removed from my workshop for causing a loud scene that she escalated over a discussion of my warning to Icelanders. A full police investigation failed to bring any charges and proved that she lied about being assaulted. She also has long record of “Islamophobia” propagandizing. Her “Islamophobia” smears have now expanded into the US as well.
Employing deceit is indicated in the Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America…..
The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Proecess” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.
An implicit encouragement of such deceit in the way of jihad came from the late Sheikh Dr Yusuf Al‑Qaradawi, the former chairman of the International Union of Muslim Scholars. Qaradawi was listed among the 500 most influential Muslims and described by TheMuslim500 as “a man of faith, of courage, of letters, of oration, of the people, and of political and social activism.” Qarawadi stated:
Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing], that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.
Braverman’s warning about a “highly coordinated’ Islamist network” at work in the UK “while looking ‘perfectly respectable'” will surely attract smears of “Islamophobia,” despite the documented instructions of deceit that have come from influential Muslim sources. The entire “anti-racism” industry has been hijacked by the woke and Islamic supremacists. This industry will now target Braverman; the only question is whether or not her government will back her.
“Islamophobia” in the UK was defined as “rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.” In Canada, it was defined as “fear, prejudice, hatred or dislike directed against Islam or Muslims, or towards Islamic politics or culture.” This definition was formulated with input from the National Council of Canadian Muslims (formerly CAIR-CAN).
Anyone brandishing the “Islamophobia” club is questionable, as they label any criticism of Islamic practice and ideology as “Islamophobic,” with the result of rendering Westerners compliant with the Sharia. Braverman has an uphill battle, as she is confronting Sharia teaching regarding “insults” to Islam, a teaching which never should have been accepted in the West in the first place.
‘Political correctness’ allowing Islamist extremism to flourish in Britain: Home Secretary Suella Braverman,” WION, March 2, 2023:
The United Kingdom Home Secretary Suella Braverman warned against Islamist extremism and cautioned that ‘political correctness’ in the larger scheme of things for British national security, has created a blind spot for such extremism to flourish.
Braverman told a counter extremism conference that a “highly coordinated” Islamist network was working in the United Kingdom while looking “perfectly respectable” but contained extremist views under the surface.
“We have a blind spot in the system,” she said. “It has allowed certain Islamist groups to operate under our radar. There can be no place for political correctness in our national security. In fact, I would like to banish it altogether.”
Braverman’s remarks came at an independent review of Prevent, the government’s counter-extremism programme. It was found that the much-anticipated counter-extremism programme had failed to tackle Islamist radicalisation.
Braverman hit out at advocacy groups such as MEND (Muslim Engagement and Development) and CAGE. The latter claims that it is working to “empower communities impacted by the War on Terror”, but has often found itself surrounded by claims of spreading ‘dishonest narratives’.
“Groups like Mend and Cage have persistently pursued harmful and dishonest narratives, which until now have gone largely unchallenged. Their members have repeatedly been involved in the demonisation of Muslims who cooperate in counter-extremism efforts,” Braverman said.
“Extremism is not only dangerous because it can lead to violence…..
somehistory says
so, now what does she plan to do about it?
Will she confront the mozlum creep who is persecuting and endangering the life of the poor kid with autism who was only trying to get along at school?
Will she demand an apology from the akbar terrorist who is terrorizing the child, and the other students because the kid’s personal copy of the book of evil filth, the one that demands murder for the sake of a demon ‘god,’ was, at some point, torn and at some point, became dirty with actual soil instead of the dirt it already had?
Will she demand that he and the other mozlums making threats and accusations be held accountable for putting an innocent child at risk?
Will she demand that mozlums be forced to recognize and admit that the U.K. doesn’t have soiling/tearing of the evil book as a “crime” and there is no punishment for tearing, soiling, burning, etc. that book?
Jayell1 says
‘Blind spot in the system has allowed certain Islamist groups to operate under our radar’
Complete and utter rubbish. This is what they intended all along when a former Labour government signed an agreement with a an unnamed foreign country to ‘allow muslims in the UK to practise their faith unhindered’, except they were either too stupid and ignorant to realise exactly what ‘practising the islamic faith’ meant, or they thought they could keep a lid on these antediluvian savages, or they’re just realising what sort of backlash is coming their way when they couldn’t keep sweeping the catalogue of ‘sanctified’ depravity under the carpet for ever. Yet they persist in trying to foist this fiction of ‘islamism’ on everyone to try and get themselves off the hook when everyone and his/her dog now knows full well that there is only one ‘islam’ and you can’t sell toxic garbage just by changing the brand name.
PRCS says
The term Islamism is, however, legitimate.
Not a different interpretation of–as you correctly note–the one Islam, but the degree to which Muslims around the world will advocate Islamic militancy or fundamentalism..
ˈizlaməst]
NOUN
an advocate or supporter of Islamic militancy or fundamentalism:
“radical Islamists”
ADJECTIVE
relating to, advocating, or supporting Islamic militancy or fundamentalism:
“hardline Islamist groups” · “Islamist ideology”
Grandma Fatima in Iraq likely isn’t an Islamist, but so many within our own countries–to our great detriment–are.
IMO, her use of the term “certain Islamist groups” is legitimate.
But, what will and can she do about that in the UK?
Jayell1 says
The term ‘islamism’ – relating to ‘islamic militancy and fundamentalism’ – would be admissible if islam itself was not transparently based on the selfsame fundamentalist miliitancy. Further proof of this can be found in the words of so many islamic ‘scholars’ and clerics who openly declare that there is no ‘islam/islamism’ distinction and that so-called ‘islamists’ are simply paid-up muslims following their ideology to the letter. If liberal Western apologists want a quiet life and duck the unpleasant issues that are now staring them in the face, that’s OK so long as they’re happy with the consequences of living in the fantasyland they’re creating for themselves. But they have no right to play around with words and force everyone else into the same hell hole.
PRCS says
“The term ‘islamism’ – relating to ‘islamic militancy and fundamentalism’ – would be admissible if islam itself was not transparently based on the selfsame fundamentalist miliitancy.”
The point remains.
Yes, Islam–the ideology–is fundamentally militant.
But, it’s the degree to which individual Muslims/groups advocate for Islamic militancy and fundamentalism in the UK that she’s referring to.
While both Cage and MEND denounced Braverman’s comments, they didn’t deny them.
She should challenge them to prove her wrong.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I know that you’re probably not a native speaker of muslim languages like Arabic, Urdu, Turkish, et al – and neither am I. However, do you know of equivalents of the terms ‘islamism’ or ‘islamist’ in these languages existing that are different from islam itself, even if you don’t know what those words/terms are?
Pete Peterson says
Bravo to Ms. Braverman and Ms. Douglas-Williams ! They are pointing out the WOLVES in sheep’s clothing ! We need people like these two women in America .”American” Muslims do not speak out against the violent and murderous jihadists….WHY don’t they speak out ? ! ? !
tim gallagher says
All of our western countries seem to me to have tried to be wonderfully nice and soft, or maybe it is showing how wonderfully virtuous we are, by letting Muslims into our countries. I suppose that it is true that when Muslims first began to be let into our countries, most people and most politicians knew bugger all about islam’s nature and its total incompatibility, but for a long time now, it should have been clear that islam brings far too much trouble. Hungary and the other Visegrad bloc countries have it right. Trying to get on with Muslims is the very definition of a waste of time. Muslims are out to impose islam on all of us and they need to be kept out. islam has nothing good to bring to any non-Muslim country. islam is barbaric primitivism and is completely uncivilised in its attitude to all aspects of human life.
James Lincoln says
Perfectly stated, tim.
My compliments.
tim gallagher says
Thanks, James. I’m a bit like a broken record, saying the same thing over and over again, but, to my mind, islam truly is like some kind of throwback to mankind’s primitive days, specifically to a 7th century Arabian way of life, with its child brides, honour killings, desire to kill all non-believers, etc,(it is fit for pre-Enlightenment knuckle draggers) and what annoys me is that, unliike those wise Hungarians, most people in our western societies haven’t woken from their slumber yet. If and when they do wake up, there will be no more tolerance towards completely intolerant islam and we will get really tough with totally incompatible islam. I think that islam deserves as much tolerance as Nazism. Both ideologies rotten to the core.
PRCS says
Democracy and theocracy are two systems of governance.
Each is antithetical to and incompatible with the other.
Your country and mine are governed as democracies (a constitutional republic in my case). Islam governs as a totalitarian theocracy.
That is the primary difference
As a side note: Islam has undergone a reformation (Salafism/Wahabbism) which was a return to that 7th-century Arabian way of life.
Diana says
Not just Hungary. Slovakia has zero mosques and banned building any mosque. They didn’t accept EU quotas for refugees and asylum seekers from Africa and Middle East and the country has just 0,1 percent Muslims living there. The Muslims know they are unwanted in Vyšehrad 4 countries and that they won’t get nothing for free like in the Western countries. Also, there has never ever have been any Islamic terrorist attacks in Slovakia. Women and girls can walk on the streets without being scared of being raped and killed by Muslims and don’t worry to go to concerts nor are the Slovakians worried they will be blown up on a bus or train.
Deodata says
Poland was the first country to say you can build a mosque here when we can build a church in your homeland? Wish we were all like that
tim gallagher says
Thanks, PRCS. There’s no doubt that theocratic islam is completely incompatible with our democratic western political systems. It is such a futile exercise to think that Muslims will ever get along, in a mellow, tolerant manner, with our way of life. I had forgotten about that reformation that you mention which dragged islam back to a more hardline, supposedly purer, form. I have read about it a few times here at Jihad Watch. With islam I guess you could expect things to get worse and move in the wrong direction and so the Muslim reformation dragged the ideology backwards. It is good to see those demonstrators in Iran who I think seem to want to ditch primitive islam and join the more civilised, non-Muslim part of the human race.
PRCS says
+1, Tim.
tim gallagher says
Diana, I like the way that Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia deal with islam. Deodata, that’s a very good approach to the Muslims by Poland. I just wish that all our countries would follow the example given by the Visegrad bloc countries. it is the correct approach when dealing with the barbaric followers of islam. Thanks for the +1, PRCS.
David M says
Why should she care about Islamist groups? According to all leading western politicians & federal agencies it is right wing extremists who are the number one threat. According to western politicians all cultures & religions are the same, so there is nothing to worry about from Islamist groups.
Aum says
Action is what I am looking for.
Deodata says
No shit Sherlock, if you politicians ever listened to your electorate you would have done something when we left the EU after all that was one of your promises when you got an 80 seat majority. Now you start doing something when you are about to disappear for at least a decade from politics and a party to be reckoned with again.
When will we get a government that puts its people first above all else.
davidafoot says
I must give Braverman credit for being the FIRST Conservative (Shame on waste of space Johnson for letting them storm in to the country and letting Batley abuse happen only protecting Sadiq Khan!) to mention that UK doesn’t have a blasphemy law and we shouldn’t assist these terrible alien people to impose one through the back door! She is right, she also needs to get a grip on the Moslem serving discredited “His Majesty’s Constabulary” more concerned on fostering diversity crime than giving police service delivery to our Kingdom!
The Moslem use the abominable quran trick in many ways to claim offence and victimhood and further/ force the application of their revolting sharia law in this country. House of Lords 2008 has stated that body of law is incompatible with English Law. It must be kept outside the country! There should be no sharia courts in England they are anathema to our principal beliefs.
In Bangladesh a Moslem put a damned quran in a temple of a different religion to cause trouble, they also use cartoons and other excuses which are wedges to bring in abomination. Moslems like to attack weak members of our society like school boys and girls and to inflict terror on them according to the instructions in the abominable quran surah 8 verse 12 and absolve the criminals for whatever they did in verse 17! We must fight the aberration of sharia as if our life depends of it because it does!
PRCS says
Hitting the nail on the head!