The notice (click to enlarge) says: “Content with excessive vulgar or sexual language is not considered appropriate for all audiences.”
There is, of course, no vulgar or sexual language in “This Week In Jihad.” There is, however, discussion of Muslim rape gang activity and the Qur’an’s sanction of the sexual enslavement of infidel women (cf. 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). YouTube, which has proven itself to be a determined foe of opposition to jihad violence and Sharia oppression, doesn’t want you knowing about all that.
Hoi Polloi says
Can’t have children understanding what they’re facing at the hands of the red green alliance. You should have used a teddy bear in bondage gear so they’d let you pass.
Hoi Polloi says
Just searched This Week in Jihad on YouTube. At the top of the page:
“We Need Your Support To Continue Growing The Dawah.
Ad
OnePath Network
Your support will help us reach 3 billion more.”
࿗Infidel࿘ says
In the US, whenever I watch a video from either RS, Jaipur Dialogues or anyone else noteworthy for discussing either islam or jihad, the ads that I invariably get are…. islam/dawa/jihad ads. There was one where a muslim advocate begged for financial support to convert a church into a mosque. There are others tugging at the heartstrings about Yemen, which is the scene of a taqfiri civil war b/w sunnis and zaidis. Or another calling for support to Somalia. Somehow, YouTube takes the videos of anti-jihad and anti-islam advocates and tosses in all those islamic ads into them
I really wish more content creators, including RS, would move to Rumble. Yeah, their search results are primitive, but my way around it is to simply subscribe to all the channels by people who I think are worth following, and I then never have to search for their videos
somehistory says
Their goals are evil; they don’t give a care about the children. in fact, as you said, they don’t want the little kids to know what’s coming their way or why. Understanding these could give them ideas on how to protect themselves.
Hoi Polloi says
Agreed.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
While I agree that YouTube is a totalitarian censor (and one Mr David Wood refuses to consider the alternative Rumble b’cos its search capabilities are primitive), I don’t completely fault them. Any discussion of jihad news and coupled w/ it islamic texts is gonna inevitably lead to a discussion of events like rapes, murders, and a whole host of stuff not suitable for minors
There is of course one problem w/ being ‘kid-safe’: kids who are not warned about this someway or another end up risking entrapment by these savages
somehistory says
How about this for “protecting” children?
“George Soros Backed District Attorney Suspends Prosecutor For Hurting A Pedophile’s Feelings [VIDEO]”
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2023/02/george-soros-backed-district-attorney-suspends-prosecutor-for-hurting-a-pedophiles-feelings/?utm_source=
John Smith says
Thanks for the link Somehistory, and it’s just unbelievable that he was suspended for hurting a child molesters feelings.
John Smith says
Thanks for the link Somehistory, and it’s just unbelievable that he was suspended for hurting a child molesters feelings.