Two of the most valuable things by which our culture has been enriched are the freedom of expression and the freedom of religion. They are so highly esteemed that many countries have enshrined them in their constitutions. The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States may serve as an example. The curious thing about this amendment, however, is that it does not set any limits to these freedoms. In contrast, many countries have put limits on them. The Dutch Grondwet, for example, qualifies them both with the clause “behoudens ieders verantwoordelijkheid voor de wet“: “except for everyone’s liability before the law.” This clause is intended to set a limit to these rights by means of the penal code. You can say whatever you want, but in doing so, you are restricted by the penal code. Insulting or threatening someone, for example, or inciting people to break the law, is not covered by the freedom of expression.
Now let’s take a close look at Mohamedanism. It has a sacred book, called the Qur’an, and provides a massive number of stories about Mohamed (if he ever existed) in the Hadith. What strikes most students of this material is its undeniably antisemitic character. Now, it must be noted that just like Jews, the Arabs (including Mohamed) qualify as Semites, so the notion that he was antisemitic means anti-Jewish. Antisemitism is, in some countries, a criminal offense.
It must furthermore be noted that the Qur’an literally incites Mohamedans to violence, for example in surah 47, verse 4: “So when you meet the kuffar, strike [their] necks.” Incitement to violence is a criminal offense. Please note that this surah mentions the kuffar, the unbelievers. Christians qualify as kuffar. It is because of this surah that in many terrorist attacks, the focus is on cutting the necks of the intended victims. The surah quoted is only one of many inciting to violence, or insulting whole groups, such as the Jews.
In addition, Mohamedanism states that Mohamed is the perfect example, al insan al kamil. Now let’s study an hadith, specifically concerning the aftermath of the Battle of the Trench, when the Muslims broke the siege of Mecca and Mohamed believed that the Banu Qurayzah, a Jewish tribe of Medina, had betrayed him. Mohamed’s earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, describes the killing of the Banu Qurayza men as follows:
Then they surrendered, and the Apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the Apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b. Akhtab and Ka`b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900.
(…)
The spoils of battle, including the enslaved women and children of the tribe, were divided up among the Muslims that had participated in the siege and among the emigrees from Mecca (who had hitherto depended on the help of the Muslims native to Medina).
As part of his share of the spoils, Muhammad selected one of the women, Rayhana, for himself and took her as part of his booty.
From this story, it follows that the perfect example personally beheaded at least 600 fighting-age Jewish men. Some will have it that Mohamed was smiling all the time, giving him the nickname “the laughing killer.”
This episode shows that Mohamed didn’t shy away from genocide, and in this, he set an example. Genocide is a criminal offense.
Enslavement is also a criminal offense.
According to the hadith, furthermore, al insan al kamil had multiple wives. Polygamy is a criminal offense in Western culture. One of these wives was Aisha, whom he married when she was 6 years old; the marriage was consummated when she was 9 years old. In practically all Western penal codes, this qualifies as child rape and statutory rape.
Rape is considered a legitimate act for jihadists under the sharia. Vide October 7. Rape is a criminal offense.
In conclusion, we have seen how the Qur’an and Mohamedanism are continually inciting people to criminal offenses. Now, if that is the case, then why are the authorities in countries which limit the freedom of expression expressly by their penal code tolerating this?
somehistory says
Maybe because so many countries have mozlums in the government; or some in the governments take bribes; or because the members of governments are afraid of offending the hordes of mozlums; or because they are mozlums at heart or want to use mozlums to rid the world of Christians and Jews.
It certainly isn’t for any good reason.
puzzled says
Not all “religions” are constitutional. Any “dirt age” religion that calls for killing homosexuals, women who are raped, honor killings, abusing women’s rights, killing infidels and non-believers.
islam is incompatible with humanity.
JimJFox says
All true. Let’s think about religion – belief without evidence (BWE). Everyone is free to believe anything BUT religion is not factual, therefore it should not be accorded any official recognition, rather be accepted as a personal matter.
It makes me angry that BWE has so much respect & privilege in this supposedly rational world of the 21st century.
Sensible people ought to know better.
Ken says
BWE – of which evolution is chief.
somehistory says
Foolish people want to ascribe to nothingness everything in existence.
janet says
As long as islam has been around it has indeed been INCOMPATIBLE WITH HUMANITY,
iSLAMISTS HATE THE REST OF HUMANITY -THEY HAVE BEEN TAUGHT THIS EVER SINCE THEY WERE BORN. So where is the logic in the rest of us? They are finding any and all the ways they cannot agree with those against Islam and then are cowards when it comes to getting rid of all and any of it,
We infidels need to band together and destroy all who are believers in islam.
Mark says
The whole human-made religion Islam is planned to conquer little by little the whole world , by fighting and by deceit .Now they dream in public to establish one huge Jihad Qaliphate and Sharia law all over the world. Western leaders accept that because muslims use oil money to bribe the leaders , who are lying and very corrupt .
JimJFox says
Add “human-made religion(S) -Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Hindu, Shinto, Tao, Confucianism, Satanism, Buddhism, Cargo Cults & 3000 or so historical cults…”
deze MN bee says
Bi-gamy, poly-gamy.
Where I am in the Western world I have read about people being prosecuted for bigamy but I have never heard of a muslim man being prosecuted for polygamy and yet muslims talk about it quite openly. Many of them are permanently on Welfare which makes me wonder… perhaps he just tells them they are his sisters because then it’s only incest and government clerks won’t want to go there.
No Fear says
“So when you meet the kuffar, strike [their] necks.” This sentence, on face value, appears to be a call to violence. Same applies to many holy texts such as Bhagavad Gita and Mahabharata. But how would this sentence be interpreted by a mystic? Possibly it could be interpreted: “When you encounter any thoughts which prevent your progress, cut them off at the neck, disable the thought process itself in your head”.
Jon MC says
K74:4 So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allahs Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islam), until the war lays down its burden. Thus (you are ordered by Allah to continue in carrying out Jihad against the disbelievers till they embrace Islam (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection), but if it had been Allahs Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost,
No doubt a “mystic” could interpret the verse the way you say, but only by totally denying what the verse clearly SAYS .
That said, many Muslims do “interpret” such verses in a “mystical” way, but mostly just to bamboozle gullible kaffirs.
gravenimage says
+1
gravenimage says
No Fear, I have never heard of *any* Muslim, “mystic” or otherwise, interpret this to mean that one shoULd not think bad thougths.
Besides, if this were the case, surely it would apply to policing one’s *own” thoughts, not those of “Kuffar” (unbelievers).
And that quote comes from Qur’an 47.4: “So when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners, and afterwards either set them free as a favor or let them ransom (themselves) until the war terminates.”
Are you going to pretend that this passage is about not thinking negative thoughts? Try again…
Wellington says
If only the West were as wise, knowledgeable and as on point as Western leaders before the modern era were about Islam (think, as examples, Thomas Jefferson, Winston Churchill, John Quincy Adams and even as far back as Pope Urban II, who called for the First Crusade).
Instead, the West got idiots or worse respecting assessments of Islam. Ah, let’s look at the list: Obama, Biden, Cameron, Blair, Kerry, McCain (cluelessly, though classically and so fittingly, stating “It’s the Islam”), Brown, Pope Francis I, Trudeau, Macron, Merkel, Harris, et al.
Yes, a long list, and precisely to its length indicative of just how self-destructive the West has become.
Civilizational suicide continues, another example being that no longer does America have any real borders, both south and north, and why Joe Biden and hi ilk are traitors and why anyone who ACTAULLY voted for Biden (as opposed to the many spurious bogus votes for him) should hang their head in shame for a very long time if not forever.
somehistory says
I saw a report that Jews are supporting the mozlum biden has nominated for the appeals court.
It’s hard to believe sometimes just how self-destructively stupid some people are.. So very many of them, too.
carpediadem says
Yes, and just think of the enormous numbers of Christians and other nonMuslims in the US who support this creature., not to mention how many of them lobby for more illegal Muslims jihadis to come in to the US. hard to believe sometimes just how self-destructively stupid some people are.. So very many of them, too.
Every single Jew in America could be against these people and it would not matter a jot given the 323 remaining millions in the US.
Rufolino says
“Spurious” votes for Biden. Do you believe that election was stolen, Wellington ? I respect your opinions on here.
John1 says
You left out Bush Jr.
gravenimage says
Good exchange. All sadly true.
saturnine says
When Muslims complain of collective punishment, point out that it cannot be wrong because Muhammad did it, as in the Banu Qurayza case cited above.
https://www.askakafir.com/#western-oppression
Goofy says
Brilliant and highly needed reflections!
In the case if the Netherlands, which explicitly limits the freedom of religion in such a way as to reject it encroaching on areas covered by its criminal law and thus preventing development of a conflict of laws regimen there must in principle be two alternative routes;
1. The Chinese which appears to censor away from the Qur’an and other Islamic literature everything which is in conflict with Chinese law. Something similar is expected to be done with the Bible, probably to avoid claims of Islamophobia!
2. To publish the Qur’an in an annotated version with explanations of the consequences according to the laws of the Netherlands to cut the heads off infidels wherever you find them etc.
I would love to see the latter done in the Netherlands, preferably using Spencer’s the Critical Qur’an as the basis.
After that other European nations should follow.
Pluto says
Interesting approach
Wild Bill Hickock says
It is, of course, rather doubtful whether Muslims will do as they are prescribed to do by the explanations of the consequences you refer to, but at least it would be a start. Maybe a combination with an immigration law as passed by the French government just the other day could work. Provided, of course, it would end the massive influx and provide for criminal measures such as taking away the European passport and de facto deportation. This, by the way, is the reason for requiring all immigrants to retain their nationalities of origin (no ID no entry and immediate deportation). Double passports are ideal for this, in light of the fact that one cannot take away a nationality if you only have one nationality.
puzzled says
Not all “religions” are constitutional. Any “dirt age” religion that calls for killing homosexuals, women who are raped, honor killings, abusing women’s rights, killing infidels and non-believers.
islam is incompatible with humanity.
John1 says
Islam is a political system masquerading as a religion.
Eduardo Garcia says
Angola, Africa BANED Islam-Muslims to practice their “religion”? for to be insidious, pernicious.
gravenimage says
Eduardo, this has proven to be an oddly durable canard. No, Angola did not ban Islam. This has been debunked many times, including by Robert Spencer himself over a decade ago:
“Angola denies it banned Islam, destroyed mosques”
“I doubted the accuracy of this report from the beginning, and sure enough, it turns out to be false…”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/11/angola-denies-it-banned-islam-destroyed-mosques
davidafoot says
If I buy a quran which insults me I can’t burn it in violation of my right to my property, my freedom of speech and religion all of which are subordinated by our Marxist One Nation Tory traitors to the diktat of Sharia!
In 2008 the House of Lords found that the law of Islam is incompatible with English law. This is a totally evident conclusion in many respects not just child custody. Marxist traitors have been destroying the power of England over the last century which started with the UK the largest and most powerful nation on the planet, to today when lesser cultures are taking over England and forcing their law on us with treasonous Marxist acquiescence. (New Labour and “New Labour in colour blue” or Marxist One Nation Tory traitors). 26 years of Marxism find England destroyed and invaded, with massive pro Moslem terrorist marches and parts of England in a near Islamic jurisdiction.. protecting attackers of English children and the terrorist and misogynistic manual (8:12; 4:34 etc) by a terrorist foreign warlord Muhammad who insult England and the English (98:6)
gravenimage says
Islam and Criminal Law
……………………………………
Yes–Shari’ah law is not comapatible with any civilized body of laws, but pious Muslims believe that Sharia’h trumps all Infidel law–and many act accordingly–hence Jihad terror.