Islam has experienced a global decline since the Battle of Vienna in 1683. Instead of waning completely, it underwent two significant advancements in the 20th century: due to the discovery of oil in Saudi Arabia in 1938 and Islam’s coupling with Leftist philosophies, including both Marxist and non-Marxist, which were sparked by the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917.
The profusion of hydrocarbons had a detrimental impact on Muslims, similar to how an excess of any resource can lead to widespread corruption in the community. The tremendous reaches under the sandy dunes have not resulted in happiness, though; they have led to a well-observed retrograde movement. Islamic fundamentalists envision their future as a return to 7th-century societal norms and values.
Put simply, our world is home to two observable groups of humans: one that undergoes evolutionary changes and another that has willingly opted for a road of degeneration. Given the opposing movements of these two notable groups of individuals, it is probable that they will eventually collide and annihilate.
The widely known “clash of civilizations” is not the primary occurrence. This phenomenon merely indicates a more profound underlying process: the complex coexistence of two distinct subspecies of humans, one advancing socially and another regressing socially. To elucidate, while biological evolution (a directionless and brainless endeavor) continues to impact all individuals, societal evolution does not have the same influence. Indeed, certain individuals forge ahead while others march backward.
For example, the resurgence of jihad activity has regressed some societies back to the pre-modern era. Just as positrons (particles of anti-matter) could be interpreted as electrons flowing back in time, as suggested by Nobel laureate physicist Richard Feynman, jihadist Muslims can be perceived as being anti-human.
Thus, the time has come to identify yet another strain of anti-Semitism. In addition to well-known branches, like Left anti-Semitism, Right anti-Semitism, religious anti-Semitism, and racial anti-Semitism, the anti-Semitism of anti-humans occupies a special place. However, if we are talking about anti-Semitism, it is necessary to define this strangeness clearly.
Anti-Semitism manifests animosity toward the superposition of Jewish achievements of the past, present, and future.
Perhaps this hatred is based on envy, but the essence in this definition is not that, but the word “superposition.” That means that anti-Semites, as a rule, do not envy the success of any particular Jew—they resent an aggregate, a collective image of successful abstract Jews of the past, present, and future.
The irrationality of anti-Semitism stems directly from the fact that anti-Semitism projects the timeless global success of Jews—all past, all present, and all future—onto one concrete Jew at a given time, on the Jew whom the pogromists have chosen as their next victim. Furthermore, since among Jews, as among all people, there is a percentage of bitter losers, the above definition of anti-Semitism applies to them as well (Natan Sharansky aptly names these Jewish anti-Semites “un-Jews”).
Note that anti-Semitism is a self-sufficient system of views that no longer require the existence of Jews. For example, the Aztecs are long extinct from the face of the Earth. Any enmity toward them (anti-Aztecism) is over too. Spartans are no longer with us. Animosity toward them, if any, is gone, too. However, if tomorrow the last Jew dies, anti-Semitism will continue. The proof comes from widespread anti-Semitism in countries where practically nobody has ever met a Jew, like China or Pakistan.
Consider another extreme case: a world where everyone is a Jew. Will anti-Semitism fade? The answer is no, unfortunately. The reason behind it is straightforward: anti-Semitism is not a rational anomaly; it is a glaring, irrational idea. It is the most pathetic, absurd, ignorant, and bigoted conception ever concocted.
Jews’ extermination will not eliminate anti-Semitism. Israel’s annihilation will not get rid of anti-Semitism. After dealing with Jews, anti-humans and their avant-garde—the Tunnel Tribe—will proceed with all other “non-believers.” Even after establishing the Notre Dame Mosque in Paris and the Capitol Mosque in Washington, DC, anti-humans will never stop. Do not forget: they are moving back in time, which positions them on a permanent collision course with the rest of humanity. The pattern of anti-humanization will never cease until the obliteration of most—if not all—carriers of anti-humanism.
The range of potential approaches to address the problem is restricted due to its foundation in the metaphysical realm. Taking into account the nonsensical nature of the anti-Semitic ideological universe, logical arguments will not be compelling. Therefore, there are few feasible methods.
In the transcendental domain, an attempt could be made to move Islam away from fundamentalism. In essence, it is a program that cultivates “bad Muslims,” where “bad” is from the fundamentalist interpretation of Islam’s holy books, by convincing them that being “bad Muslim” actually means “good Muslim” for the rest of the planet. It would be Islam’s reformation of sorts, prepared by non-Muslims for Muslims, constructed upon the argument that the rest of the world is already populated by mostly “bad Christians,” “bad Jews,” and “bad Whatever,” where “bad” is bad only from a specific dogma. Being a little “bad” from one’s tribe’s point of view benefits everybody.
The second method involves physically eliminating individuals who propagate backsliding ideologies. The state of Israel does just that. Israelis, including non-Jews, are on the front lines of the planet-wide annihilation of matter and anti-matter, humans and anti-humans. The annihilation parade causes severe damage, complete ruin, and mass murder. The time ahead remains uncertain; however, the coming decades will provide evidence regarding the feasibility of the two commonsensical approaches discussed above.
However, the most promising, long-term approach would be the alternative initiative of geoconservatism.
Anti-Semitism (in its original sense of anti-Jewishness) is not a disease of society; instead, it is a symptom of the unhealthiness of society at large. By refusing to acknowledge anti-Semitism, society denies a sober diagnosis. It guarantees the failure of all attempts to eradicate anti-Semitism because society will concentrate on treating symptoms, not the core problem.
Rather than being a detached episode, anti-Semitism must be considered a coercion tool used by governments. Recall that anti-Jewish pogroms were never spontaneous; instead, they were carefully planned and executed by coercive governments and government-associated institutions. Some institutions that play a crucial role in coercive government coalitions are transcendental in nature, like institutionalized religions. To illustrate, present-day, institutionalized Islam is a government agency with a deity marginally attached.
Contrarily, governance by consent does not need anti-Semitism. The overall evolution of freedom shifts the balance of governance types from coercion to consent. As a result, the number of conservative governments will grow over time, and consequently, anti-Semitism will wither away.
The geoconservatism thesis would render all governments too weak to even think about aggressive or unfriendly moves against their citizens or neighbors. That is utopian, of course, but only to a degree because such a power structure worldwide would constitute a desired stability mechanism. The existence of sufficiently small-scale governments that barely deal with garbage, crime, and highways guarantees freedom. In a genuinely free society, anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism, anti-Israel, and anti-Judaism (these are distinguishable marketing campaigns, different avenues in pursuit of the same goal: the physical eradication of Jews) are obsolete anachronisms.
In other words, the means to defeating anti-Semitism is not the physical elimination of people who fall for it. It is not defeating anti-Semitic countries militarily per se. The key to the ultimate elimination of anti-Semitism is to make this sentiment unprofitable, unneeded, and uncool, which is the direct byproduct of a truly conservative government by consent.
Gary Gindler, Ph.D., is a conservative columnist at Gary Gindler Chronicles and a new science founder: Politiphysics. Follow him on Twitter/X. This piece is adapted from Gary’s forthcoming book, “Left Imperialism” (Paragon House, 2024).
sc says
They are more than welcome to return to the 7th century. We could easily shut down the oil, demolish all the buildings and remove their access to all technology, especially cell towers.
Many Islamic nations still do live in close to 7th century conditions.
If we did shut them down, China would be in there like a shot to get the lights on and sell them cheap Chinese phones with built in spyware and remote kill switches.
tim gallagher says
When your ideal of how human beings should relate to one another is the way that 7th century primitives in Arabia related to one another, which is the goal of Muslims, (women as second rate, child brides, calls for non-Muslims to be killed, etc) then you sure as hell are remaining unevolved. islam wants to drag us all back from civilised, enlightened ways of behaving to a barbaric, primitive lifestyle. Looking at the way Muslims live, especially say in Afghanistan, is like looking way back in time. It is 2024 and you are looking at a bunch of knuckle dragging primitives.
Wellington says
I know of no ideology, secular or religious, tg, that has been such a curse to mankind over such a long period of time as Islam has been. Here it is easily #1.
tim gallagher says
I agree, Wellington. If only almost all people in our societies would learn a bit about islam and then they would wake up and they would demand that our politicians stop letting Muslims invade our countries. You would think that, by now, enough people would be awake to islam’s malignant nature and the door would be slammed on importing these totally incompatible enemies of all civilised values into all non-Muslim countries. There are far too many incredibly slow learners in our societies. It isn’t rocket science to wake up and realise what a poisonous ideology islam is. It amazes me that so many people still haven’t got the message when it comes to islam.
terry says
Simply put: Christophobic. Or antichrist’s in spirit.
bill says
He may have a PHd (in something) but he fails to mention the basic cause of anti semitism lies in Christianity. For many centuries the people of Europe and then the Americas were taught that the Jews killed Jesus; though in fact it was the Romans who should have had the blame, but of course Romans were responsible for the establishment of Christianity, so that was not an acceptable idea. I believe it was not until the 21st century that the Vatican removed that accusation from their teachings. As for the anti semitism of the Muslims, that of course stems from the Quranic verses.