Instead of a statue of Queen Elizabeth, Trafalgar Square will feature “transgender sex workers.”
Satire is practically pointless nowadays. I’ve done plenty of satire over the years and I doubt that I could make up wilder headlines than the reality. Take this one up above. I’d like to say that I made it up, but we ended up living in a world in which it’s just everyday reality.
Sadiq Khan has been criticised for effectively blocking a statue of Queen Elizabeth II in Trafalgar Square until 2030 at the earliest – with “woke art” going there instead.
The London Mayor has signed off on the empty Fourth Plinth, where campaigners hope to erect the statue of the beloved late monarch, for “woke” art until the end of the decade.
The first piece to go up for six months will be a fixture of 850 faces of trans people who were mostly sex workers.
This goes back to 2022 when London’s Muslim mayor insisted on dedicating the fourth plinth to various anti-British, anti-Western and leftist materials rather than to Queen Elizabeth.
Calls have been made in recent days for the plot, currently used for a different monument every two years, to have a permanent statue of Queen Elizabeth II.
However, Mayor of London Sadiq Khan said the plinth would continue to be used for temporary installations, as it has since 1999.
The latest occupant of the Trafalgar Square corner was unveiled yesterday – a statue of anti-colonialist John Chilembwe by artist Samson Kambalu entitled Antelope.
Before that there had been a “sculpture” opposing the Iraq War, a giant blue rooster, and a disembodied grotesque nude. Next up will be this abomination.
“Casts of the faces of 850 trans people, most of whom are sex workers. She works closely with this marginalised community that sometimes is unable to access social care. The casts will be arranged round the plinth in the form of a Tzompantli, a skull rack from Mesoamerican civilisations (an area covering Central Mexico to northern Costa Rica). It was used to display the remains of war captives or sacrifice victims.”
Lovely.
Opponents of putting up a statue of Queen Elizabeth on the Fourth Plinth claim that it has become the “people’s plinth.” In no way does this represent anything that normal people actually want. The artwork is selected by an Arts Council which has nothing to do with any people, only with leftist activists out to destroy art and the UK.
London voters will have a chance to decide if this is the city and the country they want to live in.
somehistory says
“marginalized” by the people in the “marginalized group.”
People who make their ‘living’ providing for the satisfaction of lust in illicit ways in order to be paid, can’t expect anyone with morals to welcome them and make them feel a part of the *normal* community.
And the mozlum khan is a con….he cares nothing for the people of London.
Hoi Polloi says
He’s also been out proselytizing for islam, claiming it’s “more diverse” than other religions. Well yes, if you consider all the ways islam calls for terrorizing people and the sanctions for lying about it. He makes my skin crawl.
Peacelover says
Can anyone tell me how this Mus got voted in within a British country? Excuse my ignorance but the Brits can’t be That stupid are they? Please excuse my ignorance of the facts here(concerning my question).
Ian Senior says
London population no longer White British. It is now a Muslim population like every major city in Britain.
Victoria says
…and that’s the plan for everywhere…
Jayell1 says
Slight exaggeration there. Greater London has 32 boroughs of which only about 7 or 8 have anything like enough specifically islamic contamination to cause serious problems in itself. The problem lies more with Islam plus the rest of the ‘ethnic enrichment’ which now adds up to approaching 60% of the Capital’s population which, with all the left-wing-liberals, is tending to coalesce together behind the rather loud-mouthed Champions of the Great Prophet, who, of course respect no one and nothing (including the principles of UK democracy) apart from themselves.
The current London ‘Mayor’ got himself elected with the aid of his compatriots (religious and otherwise), his British pseudo-‘socialist’ or Marxist ideological chums and all the other traditional, dyed-on-the-wool, knee-jerk British ‘Labour’ voters who hadn’t realised that this Third World refugee plus his advisers had been pulling the wool of their eyes all the time. Once in office, of course, the carefully-crafted pretence and covert rule-bending stopped and the real rule-bending started – and now, of course, the whole world can see what a mess we’ve got.
PS – Did the good readers on this site know that the UK’s own, 21st. century ‘Genghis’ Khan (yea verily, for it is He who shall save the World – whilst the UK’s Capital City descends into a financially and morally bankrupt criminal cesspit) once offered to ‘educate’ your Mr. Trump in Art of Statesmanship? Please try to contain your hysterics!
rick says
I want to say Brits can be that stupid but I’ll say this instead: There are a lot of Pakistanis in London and they vote as one. Add to that the LGBTQ people and you have another very political minority that vote as a block. Add nice white Liberals who vote with their LGBTQ friends and you have another voter group. That should be enough to win and keep on winning. That a Muslim Mayor is advocating LGBTQ statues that conflict with Islam, that tells you how important is the Gay-Trans vote for him.
James Lincoln says
Good analysis, Rick.
Treereen says
Modern London is 60%+ “minority” and increasing every year. They voted him in. In 2020, when the virus “struck”, he decided to stay on for 4 more years without an election. People like this mayor of London worm their way up in the ranks of the Labour party (more or less equivalent to US Democrats), while spouting all the socialist, multi-kulti, pro-immigration and alphabet nonsense they don’t really believe in. For now, where the Labour party wants to go is where him and his kind want to go too.
Tony Rice says
Maybe that there are 2 million of his co-religionists in London may explain, ain’t gonna be easy to shift him.
tharmon says
This is the same country that survived the Blitz?
James Lincoln says
Geographically the same – culturally very different, tharmon.
Ian Senior says
It is offensive that our Capital City London does not have a British Mayor.
Sadik Khan is a Muslim. Foreign Nationals must not be allowed to take up public office posts in Britain.
Foreign Nationals need to enter politics in their own countries NOT Britain. The British have a right to run and control British affairs themselves and this needs to be respected.
Treereen says
Unfortunately, he was born here and is “British”. No, let me rephrase that: he’s got a British passport. That makes the whole thing of preventing “extreme private interests” from entering politics a lot harder and it’ll get worse with time as more like him attain public office.
rick says
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan is with the radical Islamists when London Muslims hold “Death To Israel” parades and threaten Jews on the streets but he is willing to leave traditional Islam when it comes to Trans genders and LGBTQ because they are proven enemies of traditional Western Politics, Ideas and Culture and after all isn’t the destruction of the West foremost on the agenda of Muslims.
The Istanbulian says
Wouldn’t that be better if in Madrid?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Daniel, you get to join the Babylon Bee publishers, who told Elon Musk that they were looking at diversifying into news since satire is getting too realistic these days 😈😂🤣
The late Queen – she’s dead and White, which is why a statue of her at Trafalgar Square is a big no-no! I guess the sex workers were chosen since a statue of Muhammad would be verboten
somehistory says
and mozlums treat all females like ‘sex workers.’ But without the payment.
Hoi Polloi says
Good observations, both of you.
somehistory says
Thank you for my small part
Major Tom says
“When a nation turns it’s back on God….it is turned into Hell……”
Goofy says
Do we see in Sadiq Khan the great reformer of Islam?
Throwing sexual transgressors and deviants off tall buildings is not prescribed in the Qur’an, and many Muslim scholars will argue that they were short of tall buildings at the time of the best man who ever lived!
Therefore, Muhammad did the best he could under the conditions: Beating with sandals for male homosexual offenders (how cruel!) and locking up and starving lesbians to death (that is more like it!)
Instead of doing what Muhammad said why not do as he did, which is generally considered the gold standard for the Muslim way of life?
Muhammad was a one man LGBTQ+++ movement as he for good measure threw in some some extra sexual perversions.
Maybe Sadiq Khan can do something in this respect, not that I am for promulgation of sexual perversion but I am against Islamic hate murders.
Tony Rice says
Well chosen name b t w, but the content of your posting clearly shows the nature of your views thoughts and dislike of certain members of society, so I don’t think too many will subscribe to your perversion.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Most of the people who disagree w/ him about sexual deviants are on the islam side anyway, despite what islam prescribes for them, as he correctly noted. Here, on jihadwatch, you’re not likely to find too many people, even LGBs, who celebrate “T”, “Q”, “I” and “MAP”. The “A’s” are the only normal people in this group who’ve carved out an artificial identity
SC says
Now he has their names and adresses and there are some tall buioldings in london.
Frank John Kupferer says
how did London get a Muslim mayor?